Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Boddy Update (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Covstu
  • Start date Jul 25, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 21
Next
First Prev 9 of 21 Next Last

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #281
mr_monkey said:
This is exactly what people need to get their head around, if wasps go bust the Ricoh goes back to the council and there is no way in hell they would sell it to sisu and I'm certain sisu are very aware of this now as well
Click to expand...
Yep are they hoping to hit people for damages to fund the new stadium...100% we need to build the stadium
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #282
skyblueelephant76 said:
We were a selling club long before Sisu came along.
Click to expand...

Part of the viability examination when the Ricoh was being built and CCFC named as tenant, expected the Club to make at least one major player sale in a season
Pity they did not own any !
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #283
With the bricks I would suggest the first thing to do is establish what is involved in removing them without causing damage. Pretty sure they're just faceplates so someone who knows what they're doing should be able to manage it.

Then there's the question of what to do with them. On the basis that at some point we will have a ground is the best option a temporary location and if so where. Ryton would be an obvious option but they wouldn't be accessible to the public.
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #284
cc84cov said:
Yep are they hoping to hit people for damages to fund the new stadium...100% we need to build the stadium
Click to expand...

Are you related to David Icke?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #285
mr_monkey said:
Exactly the same here, the best we could ever hope for is another loaded rental deal
Click to expand...

Which is why a partnership with Warwick Uni (or even Coventry Uni) is a great idea.

Huge institutions, with huge amounts of land, with ambitions to develop.

SBT said:
Agree that from a negotiation standpoint, it is smart for SISU to give the appearance of having other options in Coventry. But that doesn't mean it's SISU's end goal. Why did they buy CCFC in the first place?
Click to expand...

The situation has changed materially from 2008.

For arguments sake, let’s work on the following assumptions:
1) new stadium plans yet another ruse
2) EU complaint successful
3) resulting in Wasps leaving Coventry

In this scenario, the RICOH reverts back to CCC control. No progress has been made on this ‘partnership’ with UoW. How does Coventry come to own the RICOH?

We would still have to negotiate with CCC, and in this scenario, it’s inconceivable the relationship between CCFC and CCC would be better off. How do we agree a price for the RICOH? The CCC showed no willingness to sell their share to CCFC before all this kicked off.

Regardless of their intentions in 2008. Since the the sale of the RICOH to Wasps, it makes the most sense to give up on the aspiration of owning the RICOH and building our own stadium.
 
Last edited: Jul 26, 2020
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue, djr8369, Limey and 1 other person

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #286
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Which is why a partnership with Warwick Uni (or even Coventry Uni) is a great idea.

Huge institutions, with


The situation has changed materially from 2008.

For arguments sake, let’s work on the following assumptions:
1) new stadium plans yet another ruse
2) EU complaint successful
3) resulting in Wasps leaving Coventry

In this scenario, the RICOH reverts back to CCC control. No progress has been made on this ‘partnership’ with UoW. How does Coventry come to own the RICOH?

We would still have to negotiate with CCC, and in this scenario, it’s inconceivable the relationship between CCFC and CCC would be better off. How do we agree a price for the RICOH? The CCC showed no willingness to sell their share to CCFC before all this kicked off.

Regardless of their intentions in 2008. Since the the sale of the RICOH to Wasps, it makes the most sense to give up on the aspiration of owning the RICOH and building our own stadium.
Click to expand...
100% we can’t deal with CCC we seemed to be about to burn all bridges with wasps question is are SISU about building the stadium
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #287
usskyblue said:
I understand the anger and the feeling of wanting to do something about it.....but all this talk of removing bricks and statues is playing right in to the hands of the people we disagree with most. Do you think the Trust will back you up in the media? Do you think the CET will paint you as victims of CCC and W*sps’ bullshit?

All it will do is give these Twitter and FB trolls ammunition and recruitment fodder.

If you want your voice heard, make a bold statement from this forum and when fans are allowed back in - GO AND SUPPORT THE TEAM.

After all that’s happened, anyone still stuck in the Sixfields days needs to be left behind anyway. They are toxic and terminal.
Click to expand...

Agree with that. The biggest "fuck you" would be showing Wasps and CCC what they could have had.

Packed out pubs, people getting behind the club and fan unity.

People have said for years that SISU want to divide the fans, the fact CCC had to get a PR company in to do exactly that shows that they don't want the fans to unite against them. Duggins gloating about "public opinion" being on their side, fuck that.

Have said for years, what would scare Wasps and CCC most would be a united (as much as possible) fan base against them and fully behind CCFC (CCFC, not SISU).
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue, Skyblueweeman, oldfiver and 2 others
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #288
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Which is why a partnership with Warwick Uni (or even Coventry Uni) is a great idea.

Huge institutions, with huge amounts of land, with ambitions to develop.



The situation has changed materially from 2008.

For arguments sake, let’s work on the following assumptions:
1) new stadium plans yet another ruse
2) EU complaint successful
3) resulting in Wasps leaving Coventry

In this scenario, the RICOH reverts back to CCC control. No progress has been made on this ‘partnership’ with UoW. How does Coventry come to own the RICOH?

We would still have to negotiate with CCC, and in this scenario, it’s inconceivable the relationship between CCFC and CCC would be better off. How do we agree a price for the RICOH? The CCC showed no willingness to sell their share to CCFC before all this kicked off.

Regardless of their intentions in 2008. Since the the sale of the RICOH to Wasps, it makes the most sense to give up on the aspiration of owning the RICOH and building our own stadium.
Click to expand...

The situation has changed since 2008, but also hasn't changed materially since 2014 and Wasps coming in! If SISU saw that as the death knell for any deal with the council, we should be a lot further along with a new stadium - after all, what hope would there be for anything else?

SISU thought they could wear down the council and get control of the Ricoh. They almost managed it, but now it turns out they have to wear down Wasps as well. That's fine, they're up to the fight, even if it takes longer than expected. They'll continue to negotiate and wait for someone to cave. Suggesting that we are making plans for a new stadium is a key part of making sure that process continues. Actually going ahead and building the damn thing is a surefire way of ensuring it doesn't.
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #289
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Even if the EU complaint is successful, I can’t see how SISU would be able to buy the RICOH. The relationship between the CCC and CCFC is completely broken.

Factor in the desire for the CCC to make the Wasps project successful. It would probably be easier for the club to build a new stadium.
Click to expand...

I think this has been obvious for some time. Even if the relationship improved renting is never going to be ideal and the pitch is always going to be wrecked by rugby.

You can hope that wasps go bust but that might never happen, they’ll probably be saved by some rich idiot. Even if they did go bust you have the issues with the council in trying to get hold of the Ricoh.

As unlikely as it feels a new stadium seems the only long term solution.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #290
SBT said:
The situation has changed since 2008, but also hasn't changed materially since 2014 and Wasps coming in! If SISU saw that as the death knell for any deal with the council, we should be a lot further along with a new stadium - after all, what hope would there be for anything else?

SISU thought they could wear down the council and get control of the Ricoh. They almost managed it, but now it turns out they have to wear down Wasps as well. That's fine, they're up to the fight, even if it takes longer than expected. They'll continue to negotiate and wait for someone to cave. Suggesting that we are making plans for a new stadium is a key part of making sure that process continues. Actually going ahead and building the damn thing is a surefire way of ensuring it doesn't.
Click to expand...

Straight answer please:

Do you think CCC would allow Coventry City to build another stadium in their jurisdiction?

Again, we know the club has been in talks with UoW regarding a potential partnership since 2014.

If progress is made on this project over the next year, we could safely say SISU have almost certainly given up on the RICOH as a first choice option.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #291
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Straight answer please:

Do you think CCC would allow Coventry City to build another stadium in their jurisdiction?

Again, we know the club has been in talks with UoW regarding a potential partnership since 2014.

If progress is made on this project over the next year, we could safely say SISU have almost certainly given up on the RICOH as a first choice option.
Click to expand...

Yes.

If progress is made, then I agree the Ricoh appears to be Plan B. But I'll believe it when I see it. Joint statements don't cut it.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that after six years (!) of talks with UoW, we only got news of this latest new stadium project a few days before we learned the latest round of Ricoh negotiations were collapsing.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #292
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Again, we know the club has been in talks with UoW regarding a potential partnership since 2014.
Click to expand...
They haven't exactly rushed if that was the case...
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #293
SBT said:
Yes.

If progress is made, then I agree the Ricoh appears to be Plan B. But I'll believe it when I see it. Joint statements don't cut it.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that after six years (!) of talks with UoW, we only got news of this latest new stadium project a few days before we learned the latest round of Ricoh negotiations were collapsing.
Click to expand...

Based on what evidence?

The relationship between the two parties is completely broken.

Now the announcement is made, there’s no excuses for having no updates. We cannot argue about the future, as it is yet to happen. As it happens, I’ve been vocal of the need for all of us to be sceptical and to hold the club accountable for delivering on this project.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

mr_monkey

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #294
Thmm
SBT said:
Yes.

If progress is made, then I agree the Ricoh appears to be Plan B. But I'll believe it when I see it. Joint statements don't cut it.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that after six years (!) of talks with UoW, we only got news of this latest new stadium project a few days before we learned the latest round of Ricoh negotiations were collapsing.
Click to expand...

Hang on, you think that CCC would let sisu build another stadium within their boundaries? If so can I please have some of what you are smoking, there is no chance in hell that CCC will allow another stadium to be built whilst the Ricoh still stands, that's why sisu have had to go to Warwick council for the land, please keep up
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue, better days and Mucca Mad Boys

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #295
SBT said:
Yes.

If progress is made, then I agree the Ricoh appears to be Plan B. But I'll believe it when I see it. Joint statements don't cut it.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that after six years (!) of talks with UoW, we only got news of this latest new stadium project a few days before we learned the latest round of Ricoh negotiations were collapsing.
Click to expand...
Absolutely no way CCC will allow City to build a Stadium in their jurisdiction,
They will try their absolute hardest to put any spanner in the works of a potential Stadium in the warwick District Council area too....
 
Reactions: covcity4life and Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #296
Deleted member 5849 said:
They haven't exactly rushed if that was the case...
Click to expand...

We don’t know of any sticking points in negotiations and so on, but it’s out there now. The two parties have got to crack on with it now.
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #297
Mucca Mad Boys said:
We don’t know of any sticking points in negotiations and so on, but it’s out there now.
Click to expand...
You're seriously suggesting, six years and this statement is as far as they've got?

Best look forward to an ground in 2045 then.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #298
Even the most obstructive of councils wouldn't have restricted SISU to this vaguest of vague statements across seven years.
 
Reactions: SBT

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #299
Deleted member 5849 said:
You're seriously suggesting, six years and this statement is as far as they've got?

Best look forward to an ground in 2045 then.
Click to expand...

Planning a stadium isn’t exactly an easy task that can be completed overnight.

The RICOH itself took 8 years from planning to construction. That’s with a local council that supported it in this process.

The plans are out there now, and if there’s no progress on this made, then we hold the club to account.

Like you, I will remain sceptical until bricks begin to be laid.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and RegTheDonk
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #300
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Planning a stadium isn’t exactly an easy task that can be completed overnight.
Click to expand...
Seemingly nor is making a statement about how they'd like some land.
 
Reactions: mr_monkey

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #301
Deleted member 5849 said:
You're seriously suggesting, six years and this statement is as far as they've got?

Best look forward to an ground in 2045 then.
Click to expand...
Deleted member 5849 said:
Seemingly nor is making a statement about how they'd like some land.
Click to expand...

The site for Brighton’s AMEX stadium was found in 1998-99. The stadium was completed in 2011.

I’ve not said it’s acceptable that it’s taken this long. We are where we are and looking at the past doesn’t really do anything for us.

Sarcastic comments are one thing, but at least there’s something out there we can scrutinise.

We’ll know more later when there is progress or lack thereof.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #302
Mucca Mad Boys said:
The site for Brighton’s AMEX stadium was found in 1998-99. The stadium was completed in 2011.

I’ve not said it’s acceptable that it’s taken this long. We are where we are and looking at the past doesn’t really do anything for us.

Sarcastic comments are one thing, but at least there’s something out there we can scrutinise.

We’ll know more later when there is progress or lack thereof.
Click to expand...
How about Rotherham's ground taking for years?

Brighton had also applied for planning permission after three years.

We've released a statement in twice that time. So if you want a comparison...
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #303
Deleted member 5849 said:
How about Rotherham's ground taking for years?

Brighton had also applied for planning permission after three years.

We've released a statement in twice that time. So if you want a comparison...
Click to expand...

It’s not exactly like we’ve got a supportive local council to help us in the pursuit of building a new stadium though, is it?

With the whole UoW thing, since they’ve had to get planning permission from CCC for infrastructure projects. Isn’t it a possibility that the club and UoW needed to wait until approval for this first?

Make no mistake that all parties are involved in a Machiavellian power struggle. It wouldn’t surprise me if the CCC would block such infrastructure projects.

I don’t know timeframes of all this, so I’m only hypothesising here.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #304
Mucca Mad Boys said:
It’s not exactly like we’ve got a supportive local council to help us in the pursuit of building a new stadium though, is it?
Click to expand...
Like Lewes District Council you mean?

Brighton did. We talk.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #305
robbiethemole said:
Just a couple of points, Wasps say they weren't consulted before the UoW announcement by the Club, but what the fuck was it to do with them?
Click to expand...

Agreed. We weren't consulted when the Council were in talks with Wasps about buying the Ricoh.

Idiots.
 
Reactions: SBQuin and mr_monkey

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #306
Deleted member 5849 said:
You're seriously suggesting, six years and this statement is as far as they've got?

Best look forward to an ground in 2045 then.
Click to expand...
Same amount of time for the trust to do anything useful but you'll still go to meetings and tell us to wait and see.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #307
Liquid Gold said:
Same amount of time for the trust to do anything useful but you'll still go to meetings and tell us to wait and see.
Click to expand...
Ah, beautiful whataboutery whereas I did, not talked. I went to try and enact change, same as the Wasps protest. Both failed but at least I wasn't empty hot air bitching into a void. Must be doing something right when I'm SISU sympathiser to some, Trust stooge to others.

You know the argument's lost when people are residing to dog=cat.

Seriously, this place is going mental over a statement when we've had loads of those over the years. It's like groundhog Day and the onus is to give something substantive more than we've had before. It's not asking much after seven years.
 
Reactions: Iancro
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #308
mr_monkey said:
Thmm

Hang on, you think that CCC would let sisu build another stadium within their boundaries? If so can I please have some of what you are smoking, there is no chance in hell that CCC will allow another stadium to be built whilst the Ricoh still stands, that's why sisu have had to go to Warwick council for the land, please keep up
Click to expand...

It's largely academic given there aren't vast swathes of land under CCC jurisdiction that could work as a stadium for us. We had to partner with CCC to make the last stadium happen, and we can never do that again as long as the current SISU and council leaders are in charge. So it makes sense we would look to somewhere like Warwick Uni. But let's say there's some magical stadium site that we could make work on our own, and was our only option to keep the club in Coventry - I don't think the council could get away with outright killing the club by obstructing it for years like that (Would it even be legal?) Someone has to cave eventually. It's mostly a red herring though, because it's much more likely (and cheaper!) that someone at the Ricoh will cave first....
 

usskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #309
We’re ALL guilty of not doing anything to make ANYONE good on their word.

The Trust was/is tilted and burned their bridges long ago. But we, as a forum, now have a voice and a line of communication with ownership. Rather than quibble about the validity of the latest stadium ‘project’, let’s use our collective voice to let SISU know that we will need to see what tangible progress they are (or aren’t) making.

SISU have put themselves at the plate. This time we need to apply whatever pressure we can to make them accountable for their words.
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue, Skyblueweeman, ccfcchris and 5 others

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #310
Deleted member 5849 said:
Ah, beautiful whataboutery whereas I did, not talked. I went to try and enact change, same as the Wasps protest. Both failed but at least I wasn't empty hot air bitching into a void. Must be doing something right when I'm SISU sympathiser to some, Trust stooge to others.

You know the argument's lost when people are residing to dog=cat.

Seriously, this place is going mental over a statement when we've had loads of those over the years. It's like groundhog Day and the onus is to give something substantive more than we've had before. It's not asking much after seven years.
Click to expand...
Look a man with a touched nerve.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #311
shepardo01 said:
Absolutely no way CCC will allow City to build a Stadium in their jurisdiction,
They will try their absolute hardest to put any spanner in the works of a potential Stadium in the warwick District Council area too....
Click to expand...
THIS is my worry. I am not sure they will allow a Warwick stadium to go ahead
 

usskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #312
Deleted member 5849 said:
Ah, beautiful whataboutery whereas I did, not talked. I went to try and enact change, same as the Wasps protest. Both failed but at least I wasn't empty hot air bitching into a void. Must be doing something right when I'm SISU sympathiser to some, Trust stooge to others.

You know the argument's lost when people are residing to dog=cat.

Seriously, this place is going mental over a statement when we've had loads of those over the years. It's like groundhog Day and the onus is to give something substantive more than we've had before. It's not asking much after seven years.
Click to expand...

I get it, I really do. The past has left wounds that are difficult to forgive but the only way forward is to move on.

And belief or disbelief in the validity of the latest words actually doesn’t matter...at all.

This time we have a voice and communication avenues with ownership. We have to find ways to use them to either make SISU good on their word, or expose them to every single supporter.

We should ALL be behind that.
 
Reactions: AOM, Sky Blue Pete, ccfcchris and 2 others
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #313
covcity4life said:
THIS is my worry. I am not sure they will allow a Warwick stadium to go ahead
Click to expand...
They can't stop it, ultimately. First it needs some plans to object to, however...
 
Reactions: covcity4life
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #314
usskyblue said:
We’re ALL guilty of not doing anything to make ANYONE good on their word.

The Trust was/is tilted and burned their bridges long ago. But we, as a forum, now have a voice and a line of communication with ownership. Rather than quibble about the validity of the latest stadium ‘project’, let’s use our collective voice to let SISU know that we will need to see what tangible progress they are (or aren’t) making.

SISU have put themselves at the plate. This time we need to apply whatever pressure we can to make them accountable for their words.
Click to expand...
If SISU don't know that the best way of getting people to believe is to do rather than say, they never will. It doesn't need a polite email for that to be obvious.

Although looking at this board, it seems rinse and repeat is sufficient for many.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2020
  • #315
Deleted member 5849 said:
They can't stop it, ultimately. First it needs some plans to object to, however...
Click to expand...
I agree sisu need to show us substantial evidence

But can cov council mess plans up by saying roads not equipped linking to cov etc
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 21
Next
First Prev 9 of 21 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?