Transfer Rumour Brandon Thomas-Asante (16 Viewers)

Torquay Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Define balance. Ipswich topped off their signings with loanees. They had a pretty solid base with their L1 business - we weren’t ready to compete last year and a few loanees wouldn’t have bridged the gap.

In reality, we have a small squad that’s still behind the depth of 22/23 and teams aren’t going to loan us players to be bit part for us.

If there’s a loanee out there that improves what we have, brilliant. If not, we need to keep building our squad with our own players. So far, it’s going really well and if we have the resources to sign permanent players, the better.
This is a fair point. Forest were promoted on the back of top class loans and just about still there
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
The depth of 22/23? We literally flogged Vik and Hamer to death as we had nobody that could enable either to rest. As striking options we had Vik, Godden and Maguire. In the play off final our only attacking option apart from Godden on from the bench was to bring on a half fit Palmer. We had no back up left back to Bidwell. Putting out a reasonable starting 11 was dependent on loan players.
Which is actually my point. In terms of numbers we still have less players than that season. The quality outside of start XI is obviously a lot higher. So we’re a good 2-3 players short of having a squad able to compete in all cup competitions and the league.

Hot take: if we don’t go up this year Robins goes and his successor gets the profits from Wright/Simms/MvE/Sheaf/whoever.

2026/27 if we’re not up we may be adjusting to life post-MR, he’ll have probably decided he can’t take us that next step.
 

2024/25 League 1 Champs?

Well-Known Member
I may well be in a minority here but I honestly feel that losing the play off final was a blessing, we were nowhere near ready for the massive step up, not just the playing side of things’ I’m talking about the entire setup of the club, we were still basically being ran as a mid sized league 1 club at that time.

Promotion could well have proved to be a disaster imho and could have set the club back years, losing that game has allowed the club to grow organically, putting all the necessary building blocks in place to achieve it’s objective ‘promotion on the back of a meticulously well constructed 5 year plan.

Running before you can walk‘ usually ends with a heavy fall.

I said this at the time, you can’t be sure but it will be interesting to see how Luton perform this year
 

napolimp

Well-Known Member
I may well be in a minority here but I honestly feel that losing the play off final was a blessing, we were nowhere near ready for the massive step up, not just the playing side of things’ I’m talking about the entire setup of the club, we were still basically being ran as a mid sized league 1 club at that time.

Promotion could well have proved to be a disaster imho and could have set the club back years, losing that game has allowed the club to grow organically, putting all the necessary building blocks in place to achieve it’s objective ‘promotion on the back of a meticulously well constructed 5 year plan.

Running before you can walk‘ usually ends with a heavy fall.

See where you're coming from, but can't see how a hundred million + cash injection could hurt any half decently run club.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Which is actually my point. In terms of numbers we still have less players than that season. The quality outside of start XI is obviously a lot higher. So we’re a good 2-3 players short of having a squad able to compete in all cup competitions and the league.



2026/27 if we’re not up we may be adjusting to life post-MR, he’ll have probably decided he can’t take us that next step.
Fewer. Sorry couldn't resist it.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
Can’t agree because it would still have allowed us to grow organically. We’d have invested in the infrastructure and the squad as whole. We’d have inevitably been relegated but we’d be in a very strong position now to go back up.
We had to completely rebuild the squad for the following season, but we set about doing so by signing decent Championship quality players of the right age, had we won promotion we would have needed a more extensive rebuild and with higher quality players on huge contracts’ which we would still be obliged to honour following our inevitable relegation.

honestly think it would have been embarrassing, on and off the pitch, when/if we get promotion in the next couple of years, we will be going up with a full squad of players already under contract & a setup fully equipped to deal with the demands of operating a Premier League football club & stadium.
 
Last edited:

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Which is actually my point. In terms of numbers we still have less players than that season. The quality outside of start XI is obviously a lot higher. So we’re a good 2-3 players short of having a squad able to compete in all cup competitions and the league.



2026/27 if we’re not up we may be adjusting to life post-MR, he’ll have probably decided he can’t take us that next step.

We could put two sides out of players with senior experience ?

Dovin
MvE
Thomas
Binks
Bidwell
Sheaf
Rudoni
Torp
Wright
Simms
Sakamoto

Collins
Burroughs
Latibeaudiere
Kitching
Da Silva
Eccles
Allen
Palmer
Tavares
Thomas-Asante (tbc)
Mason-Clark

That still leaves

Rodridgues
Howley
Andrews
Dausch
Obikwu
Wilson
 

ProfessorbyGrace

Well-Known Member
You might be right ? I know very little about him and if we were prepared to spend 5m we must have seen something as we know we tend not to pay inflated prices.
From what I have seen, yes, most definitely worth it. 👍🏻

Think of a bigger Makelele-lite pinging passes around, haha. I think once his overall fitness is peak, he’ll be much sought after. Real shame we couldn’t get him.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
I said this at the time, you can’t be sure but it will be interesting to see how Luton perform this year
In all honesty’ compared to us Luton were better positioned for promotion, didn’t need a massive squad rebuild and were regularly selling out their stadium 🤔 they did need to quickly build a new stand’ but Kenilworth Rd is definitely no CBS Arena‘ and with all due respect is a stadium I would imagine, can be comfortably operated in the same way you would a League 1 ground.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
We could put two sides out of players with senior experience ?

Dovin
MvE
Thomas
Binks
Bidwell
Sheaf
Rudoni
Torp
Wright
Simms
Sakamoto

Collins
Burroughs
Latibeaudiere
Kitching
Da Silva
Eccles
Allen
Palmer
Tavares
Thomas-Asante (tbc)
Mason-Clark

That still leaves

Rodridgues
Howley
Andrews
Dausch
Obikwu
Wilson

Not sure we are allowed to do that
 

StrettoBoy

Well-Known Member
See where you're coming from, but can't see how a hundred million + cash injection could hurt any half decently run club.

It can surely only be a good thing to have extra cash available. I think where some teams go wrong is by spending it all - and sometimes more - in an unsuccessful attempt to stay up. Leicester City springs to mind but there have been many others.

I often wonder if it would be more sensible to save a good chunk of it to put the club in a sound financial position and spend enough the following year to go up again, although of course there are no guarantees. I suspect this could be Luton’s plan.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
We could put two sides out of players with senior experience ?

Dovin
MvE
Thomas
Binks
Bidwell
Sheaf
Rudoni
Torp
Wright
Simms
Sakamoto

Collins
Burroughs
Latibeaudiere
Kitching
Da Silva
Eccles
Allen
Palmer
Tavares
Thomas-Asante (tbc)
Mason-Clark

That still leaves

Rodridgues
Howley
Andrews
Dausch
Obikwu
Wilson

We’re not competing against mid table teams anymore, our aim is promotion and there’s a good 5 players in the 2nd XI we need to improve upon.

There’s also about 3-5 players that’ll be loaned out. The squad is the best in terms of quality it has since we were a Prem team.

To demonstrate how thin the squad can be in places, refer to the Darmstadt thread. Midfield is still a concern if, for example, Sheaf and Torp are injured which isn’t a remote possibility. Even in defence, if MVE went down injured, Lati will play RB (as things stand) so who is covering Thomas if he gets injured/suspended? We won’t go with 2 left footers unless the situation is desperate.

I don’t get this pushback against our depth, Robins himself will say the team needs more quality and depth. Assuming BTA signs, we’ve just replenished our squad numbers from the outgoings of last seasons team. The same squad size Robins called out consistently since Jan.
 
Last edited:

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
We’re not competing against mid table teams anymore, our aim is promotion and there’s a good 5 players in the 2nd XI we need to improve upon.

There’s also about 3-5 players that’ll be loaned out. The squad is the best in terms of quality it has since we were a Prem team.

To demonstrate how thin the squad can be in places, refer to the Darmstadt thread. Midfield is still a concern if, for example, Sheaf and Torp are injured which isn’t a remote possibility. Even in defence, if MVE went down injured, Lati will play RB (as things stand) so who is covering Thomas if he gets injured/suspended? We won’t go with 2 left footers unless the situation is desperate.

I don’t get this pushback against our depth, Robins himself will say the team needs more quality and depth. Assuming BTA signs, we’ve just replenished our squad numbers from the outgoings of last seasons team. The same squad size Robins called out consistently since Jan.

The comparator was a team that finished in the play off places, I have just demonstrated that our depth is now greater than it was then.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
The comparator was a team that finished in the play off places, I have just demonstrated that our depth is now greater than it was then.
That wasn’t the point I or Robins has made now or in the past. The benchmark was in the numbers, Robins said the squad size was ‘net’ smaller than last seasons and presumably wants a squad size on par with 22/23 if he kept referencing it. It makes sense and we’re still short in some areas. Which is why we’re still active in the transfer market with no indication that there’ll be any outgoings barring Wilson and loanees (e.g. Obikwu where Robins has said numerous times ‘there’ll be plenty of takers’).

Our stated goal is promotion and to go deep in cup competitions, we’re not doing that the squad of of about 18-20 players we actually trust to start a run of games.

I’m not debating you on whether or not the quality of the overall squad is better because we’re in agreement there. Outside of Vik, COH, Hamer, Sheaf and Doyle… that team had no business being anywhere near the top half. Let alone being a shootout from the Prem.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
You might be right ? I know very little about him and if we were prepared to spend 5m we must have seen something as we know we tend not to pay inflated prices.
He's not, the scouting reports said he had a lot of promise but faded badly last season and struggles when pressed. He has a lot of potential though.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
If he's not announced by 5pm then fek him Doug and Robins I want a refund back on my season ticket and shirt
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM

long way home

Well-Known Member
Its probably been done as im sure we have already agreed on terms weeks ago. Its just a medical and a few photos to be done

We definitely don't put value on announcing signings. Its business as usual and seems its a rule within that all just getting on with doing a job. Nothing to see here attitude, King has other ideas and ways of how to increase interest and income, announcements don't interest him at all.

As for Asante i seen an article saying he is a great lad who is very humble and brings lots of energy to any group. Good personality and another that Milan will love having around...
 
Last edited:

Monty

Well-Known Member
Define balance. Ipswich topped off their signings with loanees. They had a pretty solid base with their L1 business - we weren’t ready to compete last year and a few loanees wouldn’t have bridged the gap.

In reality, we have a small squad that’s still behind the depth of 22/23 and teams aren’t going to loan us players to be bit part for us.

If there’s a loanee out there that improves what we have, brilliant. If not, we need to keep building our squad with our own players. So far, it’s going really well and if we have the resources to sign permanent players, the better.

I agree about the depth, if you look at outgoings and ingoings over the past 2 or 3 seasons, we gained a goalkeeper, but we are down a CB, a DM, a Right sided midfielder and a forward.

Oddly not far off the areas we probably need more depth in, perhaps a RB rather than right sided midfielder is needed, but a CB, DM and a Forward is what many people say we need.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
we are not down a cb, we play with less cbs than we did at the start of last year. Do we need a 5th cb?
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
I agree about the depth, if you look at outgoings and ingoings over the past 2 or 3 seasons, we gained a goalkeeper, but we are down a CB, a DM, a Right sided midfielder and a forward.

Oddly not far off the areas we probably need more depth in, perhaps a RB rather than right sided midfielder is needed, but a CB, DM and a Forward is what we all say we need.
I'm sure we must be close to our allocated FFP as regards wages so I doubt we will see as many signings as some would like. Dovin is apparently joint top earner so that will go against us
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
we are not down a cb, we play with less cbs than we did at the start of last year. Do we need a 5th cb?
Cbs No GIF by HULU
 

Monty

Well-Known Member
We could put two sides out of players with senior experience ?

Dovin
MvE
Thomas
Binks
Bidwell
Sheaf
Rudoni
Torp
Wright
Simms
Sakamoto

Collins
Burroughs
Latibeaudiere
Kitching
Da Silva
Eccles
Allen
Palmer
Tavares
Thomas-Asante (tbc)
Mason-Clark

That still leaves

Rodridgues
Howley
Andrews
Dausch
Obikwu
Wilson

Always thought it would be good to have two sides of equal quality - a weekend side and a mid-week side, it would reduce the amount of games, allow work on tactics, and prevent injuries and burnout
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
That wasn’t the point I or Robins has made now or in the past. The benchmark was in the numbers, Robins said the squad size was ‘net’ smaller than last seasons and presumably wants a squad size on par with 22/23 if he kept referencing it. It makes sense and we’re still short in some areas. Which is why we’re still active in the transfer market with no indication that there’ll be any outgoings barring Wilson and loanees (e.g. Obikwu where Robins has said numerous times ‘there’ll be plenty of takers’).

Our stated goal is promotion and to go deep in cup competitions, we’re not doing that the squad of of about 18-20 players we actually trust to start a run of games.

I’m not debating you on whether or not the quality of the overall squad is better because we’re in agreement there. Outside of Vik, COH, Hamer, Sheaf and Doyle… that team had no business being anywhere near the top half. Let alone being a shootout from the Prem.

You specifically said
In reality, we have a small squad that’s still behind the depth of 22/23 and teams aren’t going to loan us players to be bit part for us.
I've just countered that point.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
we are not down a cb, we play with less cbs than we did at the start of last year. Do we need a 5th cb?
It’s not a 5th CB if Lati is deputising MVE at RB. If MVE gets injured, Burroughs won’t be playing RB and it’s not even a given he’ll be kept in the squad this season.

The squad requirement is either a CB or RB - depending on where MR wants Lati playing. He played RB against Everton which was probably his starting team for Stoke minus Wright & Sheaf.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top