italiahorse
Well-Known Member
SHLAA means Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
The Local plan will include other developments.
Sisu need to explain exactly what they are doing.
Doesn;t that mean it's being used to expand the Butts / car parking / frontage and a mixed use development?
SHLAA means Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
The Local plan will include other developments.
Sisu need to explain exactly what they are doing.
Yeah and they were by Salvador Dali, so no-one has a clue about where, why and how a stadium that looks like a melting umbrella would ever be a goer.So how long is now since we announced we will be building our new stadium. Am I correct that so far as fans we have seen some artist sketches and that is it?
SHLAA means Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
The Local plan will include other developments.
Sisu need to explain exactly what they are doing.
Remember all CCFC have said about the Butts is 'no comment'
Where are they going to build houses there? You would think the front would be car parking for the Butts.
Hasn't the owner said he is buying some land? You would think what he wants is within that area.
Read the text, it answers your questions, why you can't read it for yourself and interpret the information is beyond me.
I am struggling to see where it says which bits will be leisure and which bits will be 85 houses (whether it is the bit at the side or the back, or both). The front part to the road will be the Butts frontage.Read the text, it answers your questions, why you can't read it for yourself and interpret the information is beyond me.
Where are they going to build houses there? You would think the front would be car parking for the Butts.
Hasn't the owner said he is buying some land? You would think what he wants is within that area.
Could be flats couldn't it? Seems more likely in that location.
I always got the impression the SHLAA was a bit of a bridge anyway to show they've thought about housing, though a long way off an actual proposal.
I am struggling to see where it says which bits will be leisure and which bits will be 85 houses (whether it is the bit at the side or the back, or both). The front part to the road will be the Butts frontage.
It also doesn't mention anything about Cov Rugby owner and which bits he is trying to buy.
Very True, didn't think of that. Would fit in with the Extracare complex.
The area outlined in ink is what's available for development. The bits that will be leisure and the bits that are residential will depend on whether plan's are submitted and then passed. The area outlined is a blank canvas. That's probably why CRFC are keen to take control of the surrounding land and the lease on the BPA. Once they have complete control of the whole site they can move forward with the development of the BPA.
I am struggling to see where it says which bits will be leisure and which bits will be 85 houses (whether it is the bit at the side or the back, or both). The front part to the road will be the Butts frontage.
It also doesn't mention anything about Cov Rugby owner and which bits he is trying to buy.
1) Active frontage for Stadium (ie not the back).
2) Development linked to former Tech College development (ie the bit that joins up with the rear area).
3) Consultations have taken place previously (presumably with Cov RFC, who else could it be).
I think this is enough to chew on. You'll not be spoon fed an answer in a situation like this, you have to read between the lines a bit.
Could have flats like at Leyton Orient. I'd buy one if we moved there!
Fine for CRFC and a non league football team, in fact could be a great little stadium for the right type of tenants.
Stick some student flats next to the old folks, that's work out fine
"He's going to iron in a minute, iron in a minute".
I think I recall hearing about plans for a new stadium Jan 2013. So three years for a drawing!!
I feel sorry for those poor buggers who attended those stadium meetings.
Bit like those clowns who went down the pub with Hoffman, Elliot and Haskell I guess.
Bit like those clowns who went down the pub with Hoffman, Elliot and Haskell I guess.
Ha ha a one off meeting whilst having a nice pint in the pub. That at least did see an attempt to do something afterwards. Bit like the ML PR meetings with fans.
No those poor buggers at the stadium meetings spent a lot of their time a numerous meetings. Very harsh.
3 years and a drawing it's quite mental really. I really hope Les Reid and the CET start really asking some proper questions about this.
No the CET should have dismissed Haskell for the chancer he clearly was and the SBT and the council the same. The nonsense attempt at regime change led to mamy subsequent issues. Haskell never had any intention to buy and it resulted in major issues down the line.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?