RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
I only said Brandon on the fact that's it been much speculated with all CT articles and what not.
So's Ansty park!!!....Brandon= Rugby council,Ansty park= Rugby council..And they say no one has spoken to them...FFS SISU just go!!!! you bunch of lying parsites
'Coventry City Football Club has moved a step closer to securing a new, permanent home'
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't convention to have a new, permanent home before moving out of your old, permanent home?
Otherwise, surely you're just moving with your fingers crossed?
“Once we have agreement on a site Quote Asked Rugby Council if they have had any request on possible planning for this sort of development, NO.
More smoke and mirrors
Six years of lies and deceipt without a thought for the people that matter...The fans! Yet, suddenly Fisher is in the press kissing the fans arses. Why don't you, Septic, and your SISU loving followers piss off and leave a once proud Football team and it's fans alone. This isn't the WWE where "Diamond Bill" turns into "Razor Ramon" or the "Undertaker" turns into the "American Badass" Come into the world of reality ffs!....We are British, not American, and don't fall for stupid personality changes. Septic..Fisher....There's a "World Championship Tag Team Belt" up for grabs in a "Ladder Match" Go break your necks in it ffs!
'Coventry City Football Club has moved a step closer to securing a new, permanent home'
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't convention to have a new, permanent home before moving out of your old, permanent home?
Otherwise, surely you're just moving with your fingers crossed?
Always going to happen IMHO,
Could NEVER see a deal being done on the Ricoh because of the 'Compass' contract but guess we'll just have to wait and see?
Here's a question though. Should ACL agree to a temporary rent agreement (assuming the terms are acceptable to them) on the understanding that the club will remain there only while they build a new venue?
That would pose a dilemma for them I guess. To not agree, and the door seemingly closes on the prospect of the club playing in Coventry - and with it go the revenues the club would generate for them while in residence. Say yes, and they open themselves up to criticism that they are complicit in SISU's grand plan for a SISU Lego Superdome in Keresley, and ultimately their own demise (without a significant change to their business model).
Here's a question though. Should ACL agree to a temporary rent agreement (assuming the terms are acceptable to them) on the understanding that the club will remain there only while they build a new venue?
That would pose a dilemma for them I guess. To not agree, and the door seemingly closes on the prospect of the club playing in Coventry - and with it go the revenues the club would generate for them while in residence. Say yes, and they open themselves up to criticism that they are complicit in SISU's grand plan for a SISU Lego Superdome in Keresley, and ultimately their own demise (without a significant change to their business model).
Here's a question though. Should ACL agree to a temporary rent agreement (assuming the terms are acceptable to them) on the understanding that the club will remain there only while they build a new venue?
That would pose a dilemma for them I guess. To not agree, and the door seemingly closes on the prospect of the club playing in Coventry - and with it go the revenues the club would generate for them while in residence. Say yes, and they open themselves up to criticism that they are complicit in SISU's grand plan for a SISU Lego Superdome in Keresley, and ultimately their own demise (without a significant change to their business model).
Wasn't there someone on here not so long ago who worked/was involved in Nene Park and claimed that SISU were paying the leccy bill on the empty stadium? I'm certain i read that unless im going bonkers (entirely possible).
I think its safe to say they have their dirty little fingers in lots of pies.
Would make it easier for them to plan in advance for alternative uses for the venue however, and set up a long term plan that works for them.
If it happened (note: IF!) two major sporting facilities in the city would not be a bad thing.
(IF)
The trouble is that one of them would more than likely be a White Elephant, the Ricoh Arena has already established itself as a world class venue for concerts and sporting events.
The new stadium would have to match or exceed the capacity and the quality of facilities to attract events and this would cost a fair bit of money.
If you stand back and look at SISU's proposal it is complete bollocks and is just another roll of the dice as the endgame approaches.
'Coventry City Football Club has moved a step closer to securing a new, permanent home'
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't convention to have a new, permanent home before moving out of your old, permanent home?
Otherwise, surely you're just moving with your fingers crossed?
The trouble is that one of them would more than likely be a White Elephant, the Ricoh Arena has already established itself as a world class venue for concerts and sporting events.
The new stadium would have to match or exceed the capacity and the quality of facilities to attract events and this would cost a fair bit of money.
If you stand back and look at SISU's proposal it is complete bollocks and is just another roll of the dice as the endgame approaches.
Sky Blues agree terms on potential new stadium site and enter into exclusive talks on a second site
contradiction ?“Once we have agreement on a site,
Here's a question though. Should ACL agree to a temporary rent agreement (assuming the terms are acceptable to them) on the understanding that the club will remain there only while they build a new venue?
That would pose a dilemma for them I guess. To not agree, and the door seemingly closes on the prospect of the club playing in Coventry - and with it go the revenues the club would generate for them while in residence. Say yes, and they open themselves up to criticism that they are complicit in SISU's grand plan for a SISU Lego Superdome in Keresley, and ultimately their own demise (without a significant change to their business model).
Might be bullshit but its obvious sisu are looking to build a stadium.only an idiot would think their game plan is to be in Northampton forever.
Club needs to own its stadium, time for council to sell it back to us. Either that or demolish it out of spite
But the council are heroes right? They wouldn't do such a thing?
Do the right thing CCC and sell sell sell.
Statement was released an hour and a half ago and already SkySportsNews are reporting it on twitter! How has this happened and no mention about the Fan's Protest???
Might be bullshit but its obvious sisu are looking to build a stadium.only an idiot would think their game plan is to be in Northampton forever.
Club needs to own its stadium, time for council to sell it back to us. Either that or demolish it out of spite
But the council are heroes right? They wouldn't do such a thing?
Do the right thing CCC and sell sell sell.
That's what happened last time
Here's a question though. Should ACL agree to a temporary rent agreement (assuming the terms are acceptable to them) on the understanding that the club will remain there only while they build a new venue?
That would pose a dilemma for them I guess. To not agree, and the door seemingly closes on the prospect of the club playing in Coventry - and with it go the revenues the club would generate for them while in residence. Say yes, and they open themselves up to criticism that they are complicit in SISU's grand plan for a SISU Lego Superdome in Keresley, and ultimately their own demise (without a significant change to their business model).
'Coventry City FC chief executive Tim Fisher said: “We completely understand the pain the groundshare is going to cause our supporters but we have a clear path to return to the Coventry area.'
We were already IN the Coventry area you plum! And you understand the pain? No you don't. Fans will stop going for THREE YEARS. That is not pain it is a clear statement that fans do not accept the groundshare.
If he just sees it as pain he is missing the point completely.
So to answer your question - if ACL believe they can cover the "trade gap" then a short term deal is irrelevant to them. There is no real benefit as it closes off other opportunities. Therefore if they do feel confident that they have a profitable business without CCFC I would guess they will only be considering deals of 10 years plus. (complies with League requirements)
Even if they are prepared to consider a 3 year deal they have to be certain how that affects their plan. It might well work out for CCFC but it blocks ACL income opportunities too. Yes they will get a rent, and other incomes but in 3 years time they are back at where we are today..... or worse having to extend for an unknown period. How do you plan around that? Does that actually leave ACL vulnerable ? In cold hard business terms does that equal the best choice for ACL? It might well suit SISU but ACL are not there to run CCFC.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?