Championship thread 23/24 (7 Viewers)

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
There's definitely a player in there, he was excellent at Forest & one of the key reasons they got promoted. Arguably the standout in a poor season for Watford too. Needs to be more consistent with his goal output for sure but, similar to some of our pickups, he has all the attributes you'd look for. I'd certainly have backed MR to get him firing. £1m is an absolute steal, Villa should have cashed in after his loan at Forest when his stock was at its highest.
It's funny how quickly football moves really, you'd probably argue that Villa have moved forward a fair bit since then themselves

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
For the purposes of an argument (assuming he’d sign for us instead of Leeds etc), would anyone here rather we signed Piroe for £10m instead of Wright and Simms for a similar price?
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
For the purposes of an argument (assuming he’d sign for us instead of Leeds etc), would anyone here rather we signed Piroe for £10m instead of Wright and Simms for a similar price?


No because we would again have been reliant in n a single striker so injury away from nothing.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Whilst you an i agree on that, Swansea fans wouldn't, i'm sure.
Doesn't really matter what they think of how they were three years ago though. What matters is as of now, Gyokeres has far far more influence over a game as a whole and can carry a team, unlike Piroe.

Hence why he went for double the fee.
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
Doesn't really matter what they think of how they were three years ago though. What matters is as of now, Gyokeres has far far more influence over a game as a whole and can carry a team, unlike Piroe.

Hence why he went for double the fee.

Again...i agree with you that Gyok is better, but if you went by stats alone, Piroe looks the better goalscorer.
Piroe 41 goals in 91, Gyok 38 in 91 (plus when on loan, 3 in 19)
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Again...i agree with you that Gyok is better, but if you went by stats alone, Piroe looks the better goalscorer.
Piroe 41 goals in 91, Gyok 38 in 91 (plus when on loan, 3 in 19)
In which case Paul Culpin would have been a superstar
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Not a challenging point to understand tbf.

And Culpin has scored an infinite number more English top flight goals than either of them, so therefore is vastly superior on scoring record.
Well neither of them have finished their career and I suspect they will both score more than two top flight goals before they retire.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Watched quite a lot of Hull v Bristol City, and Bristol should have scored at least 4 (Hull should have 2 as well) Hull aren't as good as I thought they'd be, and Twine isn't a wide player (which is where they're playing him)
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Not a challenging point to understand tbf.

And Culpin has scored an infinite number more English top flight goals than either of them, so therefore is vastly superior on scoring record.
I'm confused, which of these apart from the 2 for us are Top flight? Unless you are counting the Finnish ones?

1692993818949.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top