and yet another thread decends into the same old......
League rules say it won't happenLol, that is what we said the first time
I'm pretty sure wasps did it as a favour to the councilDoes nobody get the impression that London Wasps want the legals dropped because they fear something? If not why would they give a shit.
They can always use their infamous discretion to break their own rulesLeague rules say it won't happen
They came back because they wanted to try and handicap the Wasps deal..
They were told by CCC there was NO WASPS deal!
Two days after CCFC signed .....buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
All unsaid was one in one out. However at the match somebody approached me and said they'd been told by somebody close to the club. We will have to see tomorrowWonder if that's where it has actually been picked up from or if there are others who have inside information, if it turns out to be true of course.
Do you think that TM is lying when he says the budget is not noticeably different to last year and that he couldn't complete deals with his targets as they went to championship clubs?
That was my thought. Although he could just have realised its an impossible job and be fed up with constant abuse.
Anyway here is a question - have you met Mr Eastwood, Mr Armstrong and the Finance Director (whose name I have forgotten) - have you engaged in conversation Italia?
But that's a different job he is a CEO not a tea boy?I'd say with that job advert it's very believable.
So do you think Steve was lying when he heard the same as my "tripe" Italia?
The interesting thing is you spout a lot of bullshit and pass it of as fact
When some suggestion that your beloved Wasps are implicated in being less than honest you literally start to shit yourself. Why?
Anyway here is a question - have you met Mr Eastwood, Mr Armstrong and the Finance Director (whose name I have forgotten) - have you engaged in conversation Italia?
But that's a different job he is a CEO not a tea boy?
Maybe neither you or Steve are lying. You both just happened to hear the same BS that originated from the same bullshiter?
It kind of does make sense though.Maybe neither you or Steve are lying. You both just happened to hear the same BS that originated from the same bullshiter?
As I told you at the time, had the interview but wasn't offered the job.Shame Mowbray didn't take the Rotherham job...
I doubt very much it was from the same - and lets be honest if it was just me you'd be goading me with "ha ha Grendul has a source ha ha ha" and everyone would be rolling their eyes with boredom.
Now its someone else you have a nasty stain in your underpants and thinking - how do I get out of this and still not point any pointy stick at anyone but nasty old sisu.
You truly are the biggest arse I've ever come across.
That'll teach you to defend the indefensibleFuck me. I can't even stick up for you without getting some vile nonsense spouted back at me. You truly are the biggest arse I've ever come across.
It kind of does make sense though.
- wasps need a long term commitment as it will help with stadium sponsorship
- ccfc seem to be doing everything short term, they're still postering about a stadium and pursuing the court action, I find it wholly believable that sisu would only want another short term deal - it keeps options open.
- wasps then don't want to look like thr bad guys so give it the "legal noise" bollocks
- Anderson says the legals weren't the issue.
- wasps keep refusing to talk in a negotiation tactic to delay a deal until late in thr hope of forcing the club to sign a long term deal by leaving them no choice 'long term or leave' whilst continuing to cite "legal noise" deflecting blame onto sisu.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
It doesn't matter who the CEO is , Ms SEPPALA is running the show. :cat: :rage:There are strong rumours going round social media then he will be leaving the club tomorrow. I don't know if they're true and I also don't know how much of a difference (if any) it would make to us. He doesn't seem to do a lot anyway
That'll teach you to defend the indefensible
Will TMs player budget increase as a result of Anderson's departure - must be saving some wages?!
I've heard his garden needs a bit of attention.Yes, but the remit of the new director covers everything that the commercial and technical directors don't do. Apart from being the figurehead - which Tim could do - what does CA have left to do after the new director is appointed?
Yes SISU need weeding OUT as well. :rage:I've heard his garden needs a bit of attention.
I've heard his garden needs a bit of attention.
More bad work by Sisu then surely they should have had an agreement to say nothing could happen.
Will TMs player budget increase as a result of Anderson's departure - must be saving some wages?!
Weren't you telling us he had decided to stay as Sisu had promised him money to invest in the team?As I told you at the time, had the interview but wasn't offered the job.
Thanks for that LesIt still cannot exceed 60% of income so unless the budget is under that - it will not increase unless income goes up
If what starts as a rumour happens then its definately trueIt's definitely true. They are rumours
...onwards & upwards PUSB
Think you confused him with Gerry or was that Pamela?Chris Andersen has done a fine job.
Chris Andersen has done a fine job.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?