Grendel
Well-Known Member
To be fair - the casino, jaguar hall and other facilities have got nothing to do with ccfc, we're only interested in the pitch and accompanying seating.
Don't you'll confuse the masses.
To be fair - the casino, jaguar hall and other facilities have got nothing to do with ccfc, we're only interested in the pitch and accompanying seating.
And still the chrushing irony eludes him! :facepalm:
I couldn't give a stuff about sisu or the council but the football club. It's my only interest in this sorry spectacle.
You clearly are interested in other matters. I understand.
You STILL cant see Sisu is the Club and you dont undersand anything especially what Im interested in, you on the other hand are transparent you want the Ricoh GIVEN to Sisu no guarantees no obligations no conditions brilliant. Well at least if that happens I wont have to read your posts because there will be no need for this site.
The only revelation in that post, given your obvious lack of intellect is that you can actually read.
The only revelation in that post, given your obvious lack of intellect is that you can actually read.
Were you cuddled much as a child?
What a crushing statement.
I'm going for a lie down on my shrinks' couch to find the answer.
It wasn't a statement it was a question. Damn you're thick!
To be fair - the casino, jaguar hall and other facilities have got nothing to do with ccfc, we're only interested in the pitch and accompanying seating.
I thought I was a worm dadgad? Has my status changed?
so they didnt stop paying the rent on a premise they were renting and using ?
So thats why Sisu want Acl not for the rest just the ground great so they should go to the council and Higgs and say we as Sisu just want the ground, how much, we're not interested in the rest, get real:facepalm:
We're talking about 2 different things - ownership and rent. :facepalm:
The ownership of the Ricoh is important for all of the additional facilities. However, our current/previous rent agreement had feck all to do with the other facilities and level of rent shouldn't be influenced by them because we don't use them through the rent agreement.
And my post was in reply to someone saying that rent is high because of the additional facilities the Ricoh has.
There is no rent issue now its all about ownership cant you see that?
There is no rent issue now its all about ownership cant you see that?
You have your opinion I have mine goodnightFfs..........
No they can't I am afraid their are a few short sight ed people on here that believe Sisu should be given the ground for nothing they need to get real:blue::blue:
I thought I was a worm dadgad? Has my status changed?
I thought I was a worm dadgad? Has my status changed?
What a crushing statement.
I'm going for a lie down on my shrinks' couch to find the answer.
This is where I get concerned by some posters wanting to cut costs even further-doing so will lumber us with relegation fodder. Infuriating to have to consider such a thing when the potential for success is enormous and just requires the departure of our beloved hedge fund.
We need to unite the club with ACL and cut costs, we need to become cost neutral and follow swansea's example.
I don't see how costs can go any lower without compromising our league status.
I don't see how costs can go any lower without compromising our league status.
we have already comprimised our league status
not signing king
not investing when we lost Juke
not investing last summer
costs will go lower and sadly, so may our league status
We must have one of the largest budgets in the league, it's about being smarter with the playing budget, we wasted a lot of money on players who hardly played this season. Our budget must be more than brentfords and yeovils by some distance.
It's slightly different in this league as we have stricter FFP rules.
It ranked in the top 6 I believe but the players necessary to get us out of the league won't come cheap. It won't be easy offloading some of the shite Thorn lumbered us with.
Not stricter, just different-we could run at a huge loss whilst still satisfying the criteria.
FFS . Pages and pages of the same old shite. The maths is simple 5 yrs x 1.2 million = 6 million quid . Missing F & B revenue at approx 100k per year £600000. Its only 6.6 million. New stadium that Timmy Bullshitter keeps spouting on about 20 to 30 million minimum.Who the feck in their right minds thinks that's a good idea. Rent offer 400k plus revenue for accounting purposes. Compass will not let the concession go for nothing . I heard from a staff member Timmy Bullshit told them that Compass want 24million for the contract buyout. It's all fecked people . Cov City as we know it is doomed unless someone with cash comes in and buys the lot out to allow CCFC to get all revenue from stadium and surrounding area. ALL SISU WILL DO IS ASSET STRIP THE WHOLE LOT IF THEY GET THEIR GRUBBY HANDS ON IT.
That's false ecomony and 99% of league one and two teams won't do that, which is why they brought in the % turnover not the amount of allowable losses like in the top 2 leagues.
A new stadium would be better for the club in the long term.
... But the obvious ideal scenario is owning the RICOH.