clint van damme
Well-Known Member
I get that though, and I can see the point in separating colleges from schools, but primary from secondary? Do they really fall in to separate categories?
They've also disinguinshed between pubs, restaurants and hospitality
I get that though, and I can see the point in separating colleges from schools, but primary from secondary? Do they really fall in to separate categories?
University is reassuringly low!Like how they split out education into multiple categories. Probably keen to avoid any questions about why they're still open. Total them up and that's 26.6%
Apparently track and trace says people are catching it most in Supermarkets.
- Supermarket - 18.3%
- Secondary school - 12.7%
- Primary school - 10.1%
- Hospital - 3.6%
- Care home - 2.8%
- College - 2.4%
- Warehouse - 2.2%
- Nursery preschool - 1.8%
- Pub or bar - 1.6%
- Hospitality - 1.5%
- University - 1.4%
- Manufacture engineering - 1.4%
- Household fewer than five - 1.2%
- General practice - 1.1%
- Gym - 1.1%
- Restaurant or cafe - 1.0%
Huge jump down to Hospital.
I would say yes because they’re organised in very different ways with well over 1000 on a secondary school site and perhaps a few hundred at primary. Doesn’t alter that they shouldn’t have been open mind you
From what I’ve seen in my girls primary they can bubble more effectively and control the kids more too. My daughter barely changes room, even to eat. I imagine in secondary that’s a lot harder with subject teachers and lunches and everything. Also teenagers are fucking disgusting at the best of times.
Like how they split out education into multiple categories. Probably keen to avoid any questions about why they're still open. Total them up and that's 26.6%
Like how they split out education into multiple categories. Probably keen to avoid any questions about why they're still open. Total them up and that's 26.6%
Apparently track and trace says people are catching it most in Supermarkets.
- Supermarket - 18.3%
- Secondary school - 12.7%
- Primary school - 10.1%
- Hospital - 3.6%
- Care home - 2.8%
- College - 2.4%
- Warehouse - 2.2%
- Nursery preschool - 1.8%
- Pub or bar - 1.6%
- Hospitality - 1.5%
- University - 1.4%
- Manufacture engineering - 1.4%
- Household fewer than five - 1.2%
- General practice - 1.1%
- Gym - 1.1%
- Restaurant or cafe - 1.0%
Huge jump down to Hospital.
The data has been manipulated throughout this whole mess Dave. The amount of times I’ve seen hospitalisation and death data/graphs where they break down the ages into 10 year increments but then usually do something like lump 18-64 in together. Most accept it as it suits their position/stance or just don’t realise.
Ps shmmeee is right to point out the regularity of attendance of certain places though. Also, I’m still not convinced they can accurately tell where someone has caught it
I'm sure I saw on some hospitalisation graphs they had to lump in as much as all under 45s into one category because the individual ones are so low.
Exactly. Unless you lump in groups, numbers are tiny (comparatively) and if people see that theyre less likely to follow measures (kind of understand why they do it but don’t agree with it)
Why the fuck does the pharmacist, the fucking *pharmacist*, wear her mask under her nose?!?
The security guard was wondering up and down with no mask, too. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and accept he has a reason, but if so, wtf are they doing putting him in the role where he covers most space, with less screens between him and everyone else.You’d be amazed how many healthcare workers are conspiracy nuts or anti vax too.
One girl at the hospital wears a mask all day for work then takes it off when she leaves to get on the bus home and says to the driver she can’t wear them.
After rowing about it a week ago.Looks like Northern Ireland are reintroducing lockdown measures again.
?Shmmee that only adds up to 50%
The list of where infections are
No, that is not what it says at all. This is just listing places commonly visited by somebody who has contracted the virus. Unsurprisingly, suipermarkets are high on the list given that most people use them and use them regularly.
The M.E.N. has just said it means you've got an 18% chance of catching it at the supermarket. No wonder the country is going down the pan with that level of comprehension.
I can see the headlineThe Sun is also reporting it as "Supermarkets are most common place to catch Covid", which is crazy. It's one thing for Nick to get mixed up, but quite another for the Health Reporter at the country's best-selling newspaper to screw it up that badly.
Maybe that's why the dentist won't see me until MondayI can see the headline
"YOU SNOOZE YOU LOSE. Data from boffins at the Test and Trace service shows that 100% of those infected had slept within the previous 24 hours"
As the posting on this thread appears to have dropped (to coincide with the more positive news ?!).
Probably because there was some football on
Probably because there was some football on
and a few days of fucking awful figures instead of really fucking awful figures isn't really a positive
and a few days of fucking awful figures instead of really fucking awful figures isn't really a positive
Better and more positive. Take it as you see it though
Better and more positive. Take it as you see it though
So what absolute no per 100000 do we think or expect to be sensible or viable for a carefree Christmas in 5 week's time .
Edit:- bearing in mind 10 week's ago it was down to 3 per 100000k when it all kicked off again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?