Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (13 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Better and more positive. Take it as you see it though

Best case scenario for me would be 'normal' teaching allowed to resume in the spring and an unrestricted wedding in the summer. Worst case teaching in a box with no practicals all year and wedding restricted. Could very much do with something to look forward to.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I think I’m going to puke
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
So what absolute no per 100000 do we think or expect to be sensible or viable for a carefree Christmas in 5 week's time .

Edit:- bearing in mind 10 week's ago it was down to 3 per 100000k when it all kicked off again.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
So what absolute no per 100000 do we think or expect to be sensible or viable for a carefree Christmas in 5 week's time .

Edit:- bearing in mind 10 week's ago it was down to 3 per 100000k when it all kicked off again.

none as a carefree xmas will just lead to a lot of pointless deaths and more pain
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Does it look like the improvents in treatments has reduced the mortality by around 50% compared direct with overall raw totals from the first round?
Scientist on TV this morning emphasising again quite a high percentage of those being admitted to hospital are working age mother's (women).
 

Nick

Administrator
Judging by the state of shops today, people are just meeting in them for a chat instead.

Absolutely rammed everywhere.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Judging by the state of shops today, people are just meeting in them for a chat instead.

Absolutely rammed everywhere.
Coombe Abbey they'd closed the car park again. Which meant that cars, who wanted to go there, decided to just stop in the road, rather than carrying on and finding somewhere else.

It does seem remarkably busy everywhere today! Tbf it's a lovely day, so an ideal chance to get a walk in, but still...
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Judging by the state of shops today, people are just meeting in them for a chat instead.

Absolutely rammed everywhere.

I was in town Friday and it was dead, West Orchards was shut apart from the opticians, which is where I was going for an eye test.
Even Primark was shut when left the opticians at just gone 3.
Of the few shops that were open I think the case for a few of them to be classed as selling essentials would be very spurious indeed.
 

Nick

Administrator
I went to Tesco and it was rammed, groups of people stood about chatting all over the place as well.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member


they've broken their own lockdown rules, misappropriated public funds, bent if not broken the planning laws to deprive a poor London borough of 40 million and been found guilty of bullying since this pandemic started and they haven't apologised for anything.
It should be a national scandal but very few people seem to give a fuck.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
they've broken their own lockdown rules, misappropriated public funds, bent if not broken the planning laws to deprive a poor London borough of 40 million and been found guilty of bullying since this pandemic started and they haven't apologised for anything.
It should be a national scandal but very few people seem to give a fuck.

It should be a scandal but they'll probably take their majority over 100
 

baldy

Well-Known Member
Apparently since February,the official stats are that,for those aged 60 or below & with no pre-existIng conditions,there’s only been 339 deaths...and that’s from the national office of statistics too
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Apparently since February,the official stats are that,for those aged 60 or below & with no pre-existIng conditions,there’s only been 339 deaths...and that’s from the national office of statistics too

Can't see that in any of the published ONS reports into excess death.

Also it's a strawman argument that is wrong in that it pretends all viruses don't mostly will the weakest people and it's morally wrong in that it implies that people over 60 are somehow worth less.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Oxford vaccine is 90%effective, but for some reason BBC are portraying Only 70%
Like the others it requires two shots but is 70%effective after the first , Also talked of the first being a half dose.
This one doesn't require so much paraphernalia to store it.
 

Macca

Well-Known Member
My observations from this weekend is that this lockdown is an utter farce. You can even tell the body language is different from the lockdown of Spring. Whether it’s fatigue or cynicism it feels totally different.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
My observations from this weekend is that this lockdown is an utter farce. You can even tell the body language is different from the lockdown of Spring. Whether it’s fatigue or cynicism it feels totally different.

It's normal life but the pubs are shut at the moment
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
My observations from this weekend is that this lockdown is an utter farce. You can even tell the body language is different from the lockdown of Spring. Whether it’s fatigue or cynicism it feels totally different.
The government is about to essentially reset everyone’s expectations so that 20K cases and 400 deaths a day is the new baseline.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Oxford vaccine 70% effective. It's it just me who thinks that isn't very good?
But it seems it isn't,yet that's how it's being presented

Given the others all require a double dose to achieve their efficacy threshold,why not measure like for like.
A half dose followed by a full dose achieves the figure of 90% .
Apples with apples.
Edit:plus it's 20% the cost of the others, doesn't require specialized storage,no one who caught Covid on the test required hospital treatment etc.
May also prevent transmission.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
From the Hancock interview this morning he seems to think something approaching normality will prevail by post Easter.
Now if that's when vaccine is delivered to population IDK , but coming towards summer it should dissipate anyway as we move outdoors again.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
But it seems it isn't,yet that's how it's being presented

Given the others all require a double dose to achieve their efficacy threshold,why not measure like for like.
A half dose followed by a full dose achieves the figure of 90% .
Apples with apples.
Edit:plus it's 20% the cost of the others, doesn't require specialized storage,no one who caught Covid on the test required hospital treatment etc.
May also prevent transmission.
Tbf, there was a professor just in the radio who said that was better than the flu vaccine.

Can't get away from the doubt that if we hadn't bought so much of it, we wouldn't be bugging it up so much, however.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I do wonder sometimes if there is a passive desire to keep a little bit of it knocking around.
The state of Victoria has just eliminated it within their territory.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Oxford vaccine is 90%effective, but for some reason BBC are portraying Only 70%
Like the others it requires two shots but is 70%effective after the first , Also talked of the first being a half dose.
This one doesn't require so much paraphernalia to store it.
The logical conclusion is that as the government has ordered only so many that they'll do mass vaccination using one shot
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Oxford vaccine 70% effective. It's it just me who thinks that isn't very good?

Take a look at the press release they put out and you’ll see the numbers are much better than that


So in summary:

* If you take the vaccine in two full doses it’s 62% effective

* If you take the vaccine with one half dose followed by one full dose it’s 90% effective

So not only is the vaccine just as effective as the others, there’s also more of it to go round. Plus it appears to slow down transmission of the virus, and it can be stored at fridge temperature. And we have fucking loads of it on order. So this is very very good indeed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top