Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (333 Viewers)

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Having used curfew etc. to get new infection numbers down here we've now got the inevitable Xmas "rules relaxation" spike as new infections apparently up over 300% over last few days.

Not surprised unfortunately Tisza. For some reason people seem to think you can suppress transmission and it stays suppressed. Only way you can currently control it, especially in winter is by locking down and staying locked down (unless you can irradiate and keep out of country - NZ), and the more you do that, the more you fuck people’s lives up in different ways. It’s a massive balancing act for everyone at the moment
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
It was a borderline call but like with everything covid related, it looks worse with hindsight (and probably wouldn’t have been such an issue without new variant)


I’m not saying this to defend the government but more the fact that I remember thinking at the time, if Birmingham could just get down to a transmission rate of 150 per 100k we could move to T2 after national lockdown ! People were saying the same about Manchester as well (pushing for T2)

The combo of the new variant plus Xmas indoor household mixing (winter weather) has well and truly fucked us. Could certain decisions have been made a 3-4 days earlier, probably, would it have made a huge difference with all the Xmas mixing, I don’t know but doubt it.

it was an awful decision at the time

if they wanted to treat the whole of london as one entity at the time the stats said london should of been in tier 3
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Not surprised unfortunately Tisza. For some reason people seem to think you can suppress transmission and it stays suppressed. Only way you can currently control it, especially in winter is by locking down and staying locked down (unless you can irradiate and keep out of country - NZ), and the more you do that, the more you fuck people’s lives up in different ways. It’s a massive balancing act for everyone at the moment
Quicker and harder you do it, the less time you have to do it for, however.

Yes, it'll always come back, but you have to move quickly when it's increasing and / or suppress it properly before opening up again. We fail on both, so we end up in this never-ending dripping tap effect.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
it was an awful decision at the time

if they wanted to treat the whole of london as one entity at the time the stats said london should of been in tier 3

It’s a good point about treating it in one lump.

Ps just to be clear, I’m not saying it was the right decision (obviously not) but that it was borderline at the time as the article indicates (even suggested they should’ve have even been in national lockdown !) and certainly nobody at the time would’ve seen that as a precursor to the issues London’s facing now
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SBT

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Quicker and harder you do it, the less time you have to do it for, however.

Yes, it'll always come back, but you have to move quickly when it's increasing and / or suppress it properly before opening up again. We fail on both, so we end up in this never-ending dripping tap effect.

Youd have to stay locked down during winter as most businesses can’t just switch on and off every couple of weeks and transmission is significantly increased due to indoor mixing so as soon as you relax rules it will spike massively (as Tisza has indicated)

Was also reading how the national lockdown actually caused spikes in a number of T2 areas (that had flat transmission rates at the time) as everyone went out !

ps would 100% agree about harder as in stricter for shorter periods, ensuring people followed restrictions but you’d still have the massive bounce as soon as restrictions are released....unless lockdowns been that long the numbers are tiny
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It's all tightly controlled from the centre. I believe NHS Trusts are under a command and control from central gov, I think anything that goes out needs to be approved. Everything is about trying to reduce embarrassment for the government. I watched Chernobyl over Christmas, lots of themes in their chime with what's happening currently.

Isn’t it depressing how after yesterday’s events in America, today all the populists and contrarians are back to peddling nonsense, or allowing it to be peddled, to cover their own arse?
 

Nick

Administrator
It's all tightly controlled from the centre. I believe NHS Trusts are under a command and control from central gov, I think anything that goes out needs to be approved. Everything is about trying to reduce embarrassment for the government. I watched Chernobyl over Christmas, lots of themes in their chime with what's happening currently.

The dad from Friday night dinner is fucking about again?

Shit on it.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Having failed to deliver internet and devices to all households, the government has instead reclassified the ‘vulnerable’ definition to include those without devices so they can go into school. Cheeky bastards
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
It's all tightly controlled from the centre. I believe NHS Trusts are under a command and control from central gov, I think anything that goes out needs to be approved. Everything is about trying to reduce embarrassment for the government. I watched Chernobyl over Christmas, lots of themes in their chime with what's happening currently.

What is the cost of lies?

Ha, yeah.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Having failed to deliver internet and devices to all households, the government has instead reclassified the ‘vulnerable’ definition to include those without devices so they can go into school. Cheeky bastards

As somebody said, covid disproportionately affects the poorest, and it's built into government policy to be that way.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Having failed to deliver internet and devices to all households, the government has instead reclassified the ‘vulnerable’ definition to include those without devices so they can go into school. Cheeky bastards
Subsequently filling up the school classes that are still there up to their previous capacity.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
1,224 deaths
52,618 new cases

Cases is a drop isn't it?

Can’t be arsed to check, but I’m sure someone said yesterday that they thought cases would drop for a period now. Unfortunately, with the lag for admissions/ICU/deaths there’s still a way to go.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
We're on a (supposedly) proper lockdown now. That should start to bring cases and deaths down in the next few weeks. What I want to see is vaccination figures, light at the end of the tunnel. Millions a week.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Well that sounds like a proper fuck up in Brum today.
No vaccines turned up but hapless Hancock did to get his jab. Come back tomorrow Matt you useless gobshite
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Can you link me please?


Bit of a lag. Johnson just said it’s now over 1.5m. Think it was planned to be ‘live’ daily from next week but stuck it on weekly data on site already

I hope those grumbling about the roll out are having a listen to the army guy about the size and complexity of the task.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top