Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (7 Viewers)

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Did you have it planned for full capacity? My cousin got married last year and we were limited to 30 people but it was still a nice day.
I had six at mine... and that included the two main people. Still a rare bright spot in the past year.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yeah that’s really frustrating. Hopefully we have no issues going forward for you and your missus sake

Also this acceleration of 2nd jabs presumably means we will have to wait even longer for a first one. So sick of the selfish and the stupid who have had the offer all this time and refused
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Also this acceleration of 2nd jabs presumably means we will have to wait even longer for a first one. So sick of the selfish and the stupid who have had the offer all this time and refused
I can’t imagine I’ll get my first one for another couple of months at least. The only thing you can do to convince people is to introduce vaccine passports, but we already know peoples opinions on those..
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It is a burden. Look at the waiting lists for operations now, potential undiagnosed or late diagnosis of cancer, massive expansion of ICU.

Had to book a referral appointment today (thankfully not for cancer) only place with any bookings was UHCW and earliest was Sept 2022!
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Yes, you believe an entirely implausible conspiracy as it's easier than thinking about actual reasons

What conspiracy?

Planes have travelled from India to other countries with passengers that tested negative on departure, and positive on arrival.

That's fact. The reasons behind it are up for discussion.

Then all of a sudden people wonder 'how did the variant get here'.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
Can someone explain to me, why this even fucking matters? The vulnerable are double jabbed. Millions of others single jabbed. We're doing half a million a day.

Without conjecture, ideally a well constructed response please.


Because i really do not see the issue even if we had fucking 40k cases a day, as long as thst doesnt end up on hospitalisations/deaths.

And all the science says, and shows that the vaccine prevents this in 97+% of occasions
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Can someone explain to me, why this even fucking matters? The vulnerable are double jabbed. Millions of others single jabbed. We're doing half a million a day.

Without conjecture, ideally a well constructed response please.


Because i really do not see the issue even if we had fucking 40k cases a day, as long as thst doesnt end up on hospitalisations/deaths.

And all the science says, and shows that the vaccine prevents this in 97+% of occasions
Put it together rationally and logically and tell us where you get
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Can someone explain to me, why this even fucking matters? The vulnerable are double jabbed. Millions of others single jabbed. We're doing half a million a day.

Without conjecture, ideally a well constructed response please.


Because i really do not see the issue even if we had fucking 40k cases a day, as long as thst doesnt end up on hospitalisations/deaths.

And all the science says, and shows that the vaccine prevents this in 97+% of occasions

Isn’t the point we don’t know yet? And nothing has changed yet anyway. But the gist of what I was getting was if it’s more transmissible we’ll see an increase in hospitalisations regardless of the vaccine or not which could cause issues for the NHS and more deaths etc.

I don’t think anything will be reversed from what we have today but I can see them going back on being allowed in pubs worse case scenario.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top