You are turning into a proper conspiracy crank Nick. They pay GPs extra cos the GMS contract that GPs are on does not cover provision of vaccines. Are you suggesting that GPs should set up and staff the vaccine centres for free?
Think its down to individual surgeries. My Dad has been in a lot of pain recently but tried for a week and couldn't get an appointment of any type. Phoned at 8am every morning but his surgery don't have a queuing system on the phones and by the time he got through there was no appointments left and they refuse to make appointments for future days, just told to try again tomorrow or go to A&E.
Ended up paying £200 to go private, The doctor there couldn't believe he hadn't been in with the state he was in. Interestingly the place he went to advertises same day / next day appointments but they're so busy with people who can't get an appointment at their GP he had to wait 3 days to get in but at least he got to speak to someone and get an appointment booked in.
Problems is a lack of modernisation going back years. Phone & video appointments should have been an option for years, online systems for booking appointments, decent phone systems etc but nothing was in place and we're seeing the result now.
In fairness, a few of the things that were said earlier on in the pandemic were categorised as ´conspiracy theories´ and they very much came true.
Vaccine passports
Contracts for MP´s mates
The vaccine not being effective in stopping transmission
The vaccine goalposts being moved regarding having freedoms back
There is a whole manner of things which raised eyebrows and just to call them ´conspiracies´ because they don´t align with ones own views is a bit dismissive and lazy really. It is the same with the ´anti-vaxx´ label. By all means, someone who is gluing vaccine clinic´s doors closed deserves that label, but it is being giving to anyone who is remotely skeptical to the vaccine and its roll out process.
The first two points are irrelevant the third isn’t correct and the 4th again irrelevant
That isn´t an argument.
I don´t suppose you could explain why you think that is a case could you?
The points are irrelevant as people are refusing vaccines - 100% uptake then they are irrelevant
Have you actually been vaccinated?
Are you drunk?
The label ´conspiracy theory´ has been thrown around, I just pointed out that some of the stuff which was said previously during the pandemic actually came true.
You are so intent on trying to prove people wrong that you just come out with absolute bile at times. No structure, no argument, just gibberish.
Are you drunk?
The label ´conspiracy theory´ has been thrown around, I just pointed out that some of the stuff which was said previously during the pandemic actually came true.
You are so intent on trying to prove people wrong that you just come out with absolute bile at times. No structure, no argument, just gibberish.
In fairness, a few of the things that were said earlier on in the pandemic were categorised as ´conspiracy theories´ and they very much came true.
Vaccine passports
Contracts for MP´s mates
The vaccine not being effective in stopping transmission
The vaccine goalposts being moved regarding having freedoms back
There is a whole manner of things which raised eyebrows and just to call them ´conspiracies´ because they don´t align with ones own views is a bit dismissive and lazy really. It is the same with the ´anti-vaxx´ label. By all means, someone who is gluing vaccine clinic´s doors closed deserves that label, but it is being giving to anyone who is remotely skeptical to the vaccine and its roll out process.
I think the confusion comes because they don't necessarily reduce transmission, if you catch Covid. What they do do however, is reduce the likelihood of you catching Covid.I'm all for skepticism, Christ knows we need a lot more of it, especially for people who take what they read on Twitter or Facebook as gospel.
Skepticism used as a cloak for selfishness, and repeated in the face of the facts though, that I'm not so keen on.
For example, I can't find anything reputable that says that vaccines don't reduce transmission - in fact the exact opposite appears to be the case:
How much less likely are you to spread covid-19 if you're vaccinated?
Vaccination still greatly reduces the risk of infecting others despite the arrival of the delta variant, recent studies showwww.newscientist.com
Repeating these myths is dangerous because they take hold.
Lack of skepticism does not confer protection, alas, and the more people that resist basic, straightforward, minimally inconvenient public health measures like vaccination, the longer we'll all have to suffer.
How do they check your blood pressure over the phone?It works as a triage with mine though, they filter the ones who just have a cough or a cold - means the doctors have more time to see the ones who actually need seeing.
I mean, take Monday - I have a blood pressure review, but there's no real need to see me in person, as anything they'll find out can be done as easily over the phone.
And if they're worried, I'll be there in the afternoon!
I check it myself for the week in advance.How do they check your blood pressure over the phone?
No according to the guidanceGo in the coop round the corner.
The strange thing is, I'll be in a concourse tomorrow with hundreds of others. Does it apply there?
I think he's been jabbed tbhPeople’s “freedoms” are being restricted due to people like you refusing to be vaccinated. Had there been full take up there would have been no need for vaccine passports.
So people like you come up with all these conspiracy theories, then take actions which you know will directly end up causing these events to happen, then go around saying “lOoK! i tOlD yOu tHiS wouLd hApPeN, sHeEpLe!”
You & your ilk who won’t get vaccinated- look no further in your search for the people who’ve “restricted your feeedoms”
I think the confusion comes because they don't necessarily reduce transmission, if you catch Covid. What they do do however, is reduce the likelihood of you catching Covid.
As I said, the confusion is if you catch Covid, despite being vaccinated, then it doesn't necessarily reduce transmission at that point - you are equally as likely to pass on the virus.They reduce transmission in the population, NW. That's broadly accepted and seems incontrovertible.
They may not stop you as an individual catching Covid of course, because immunity wanes. But if you slow down transmission in the community, then your chances of catching it are of course substantially reduced.
I don't get the confusion with this, the science behind vaccination is solid, and it's been proven many times.
No as vaccine passports would not happen if everyone was vaccinated (something you are very shy about)
MP on the take is irrelevant
Goalposts again as poor vaccine uptake
People’s “freedoms” are being restricted due to people like you refusing to be vaccinated. Had there been full take up there would have been no need for vaccine passports.
So people like you come up with all these conspiracy theories, then take actions which you know will directly end up causing these events to happen, then go around saying “lOoK! i tOlD yOu tHiS wouLd hApPeN, sHeEpLe!”
You & your ilk who won’t get vaccinated- look no further in your search for the people who’ve “restricted your feeedoms”
You'll increasingly see people being sent devices that can link up to a smart phone to monitor blood pressure, the smart phone app will transfer it to the GP record.How do they check your blood pressure over the phone?
I'm all for skepticism, Christ knows we need a lot more of it, especially for people who take what they read on Twitter or Facebook as gospel.
Skepticism used as a cloak for selfishness, and repeated in the face of the facts though, that I'm not so keen on.
For example, I can't find anything reputable that says that vaccines don't reduce transmission - in fact the exact opposite appears to be the case:
How much less likely are you to spread covid-19 if you're vaccinated?
Vaccination still greatly reduces the risk of infecting others despite the arrival of the delta variant, recent studies showwww.newscientist.com
Repeating these myths is dangerous because they take hold.
Lack of skepticism does not confer protection, alas, and the more people that resist basic, straightforward, minimally inconvenient public health measures like vaccination, the longer we'll all have to suffer.
Or, in the low tech world, I have a blood pressure monitor from Boots, and email them the readings.You'll increasingly see people being sent devices that can link up to a smart phone to monitor blood pressure, the smart phone app will transfer it to the GP record.
The vaccines are effective in stopping transmission. It’s just morons desperate for a conspiracy like to pretend that the primary point of a vaccine is to stop transmission. That has never been the primary point of any vaccine ever. The only point of a vaccine is to prepare the immune system for contact of whatever it is you’re being vaccinated for. In some people that will mean that they can’t transmit the virus because their immune system kills it the second it comes into contact with it but that was never the point.
They're not. The vaccine does however mean you're less likely to catch Covid off somebody who is infected. That in turn reduces transmission.Why have we got so many cases then? You are telling me they are all unvaccinated people? Because they aren´t.
They're not. The vaccine does however mean you're less likely to catch Covid off somebody who is infected. That in turn reduces transmission.
The reason we have so many cases is because restrictions have been lifted, and therefore people are coming into contact more and more with one another. Without vaccines, there would be vastly more cases than there are now.
Same here and for most things an over the phone appointment is fine and actually more convenient.Is that actually a problem? Mine do that but, if the doctor decides you need to be seen, you're seen that very day.
You can easily check that yourself if you get a reader which is cheap. Doctors shouldn't be wasting their time doing things like this.How do they check your blood pressure over the phone?
Problem is - if your getting dogs abuse for asking some people to put a mask on and you’ve got no one to back you up then you’d probably just turn a blind eye.How many shops actually care about masks now?
None I have been in even forcing staff to where them.
Problem is - if your getting dogs abuse for asking some people to put a mask on and you’ve got no one to back you up then you’d probably just turn a blind eye.
No according to the guidance
Problem is - if your getting dogs abuse for asking some people to put a mask on and you’ve got no one to back you up then you’d probably just turn a blind eye.
Why have we got so many cases then? You are telling me they are all unvaccinated people? Because they aren´t.
The vaccine does a wonderful job in limiting symptoms in the older and vulnerable, but it is not a replacement for a zero covid society.
As I mentioned the other day, two flights from South Africa landed in The Netherlands and 61 people tested positive. They then put everyone together whilst they waited for further results. This happened due to there being no requirement for negative tests before boarding (this has since changed). Instead people hide behind a QR code and think they are alright. There are some reasonable arguments to blame the unvaccinated for issues (including taking up beds in hospitals etc), but it is just common sense to see that it is still spreading like wildfire when you have had the jabs.
You cannot say ´the vaccines are effective in stopping transmission´ and then follow it up with ´conspiracy theory´ and ´that has never been the primary point of any vaccine ever´.
However, it's worth noting that if you have COvid, and the person next to you is vaccinated, they have an increased chance of not catching Covid. That, therefore, increases their chance if not passing it to the person sat next to them who, if *they're* vaccinated, have an increased chance of not catching it anyway.A lot of this is correct ESB, as was Tony’s post. From what I’ve read the likelihood of catching it is reduced if you’re double/triple jabbed, so it helps slow the spread but many vaccinated people will still get it
This and NWs article is why vaccine passports dont really work for me other than to try to encourage people to get jabbed. If they were being used purely due to concern over transmission, you’d offer vaccine passport or a negative test...a negative test is likely to be far better guidance as to whether someone’s got Covid than a vaccine passport.
As Tony said though, the job of these vaccines is to keep people out of hospital and they’re doing a good job
However, it's worth noting that if you have COvid, and the person next to you is vaccinated, they have an increased chance of not catching Covid. That, therefore, increases their chance if not passing it to the person sat next to them who, if *they're* vaccinated, have an increased chance of not catching it anyway.
Keep the chain going and you suppress transmission. Youdon'teliminate it, but you do pull it further towards a 'normality.'
tbf, every proposition I've seen for it in this country has indeed offered that.if the primary reason for vaccine passports is to suppress transmission in venues, they could offer negative test option as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?