fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
The post is apolitical
The post is apoliticalWas she not appointed by Sturgeon? That would be my first clue.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Shmmeee is right though any Act can use statutory instruments to amend the original ActThe policy I believe is to encourage people to comply and reluctantly issue fixed penalty tickets if you don't. The law allows them to use reasonable force to make you go home.
The whole world will have to learn to be able to go full lockdown almost overnight from now on. First case was when- Dec 28th I think, we are so interconnected that’s it took the bones of 3 months to close countries off- being interconnected is a wonderful thing but from now on in the mechanism is going to have to be there to shut everything instantly, going from 3 mths to say 1 week saves thousands of lives. Clearly health systems around the world will also have to adapt- I’m not sure this will “never go away” but the world is going to have to change to deal with it, because it will happen again.
This one is for you David
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Yeh I know, fucked it. But just readable enough I think.Snipping tool is your freind
You're probably right but there is a danger with that.
Shutting down in that short time frame means having to increasingly become self-sufficient in terms of food/power etc. While I've no issue with that on the whole it does give an 'in' to increasingly rampant nationalism, fear of foreigners and potential for an increase in the far-right.
Plus if everyone 'owns' bits of everyone else's economies via trade agreements etc the chance for conflict is reduced because people would be harming their own interests. Safest house on a street is the one the burglar lives in. If we start bringing more stuff in house then that deterrent for others is reduced. That is absolutely worst case scenario but it needs consideration.
self sufficiency is an interesting one- was thinking about this. ‘Conspiracy theories’, people laugh but to me that means not instantly trusting what certain people tell you and doing the right thing yourself. It’s not the govt who have helped try to control this thing, they’ve cocked everything up, it’s us, we’re the ones inside, our leaders have failed us. We all have to be self sufficient, right from maybe not spending all your cash on stuff & things but having some set aside, not blindly accepting everything, not busily destroying the environment and having some common sense. Conspiracy theories aren’t about smashing up phone masts, it’s just about really asking whether what you’re being told is true and being sensible enough to do the smart thing. Politics has become a complete cult and they all lie, you’d have to be a complete simpleton right just accept what they tell you, that is a very different thing from thinking that the pigeons were being turned into drone robots.
even re-reading that I’m aware I’m not explaining clearly, I’m hung over, hopefully you get my drift...
Which is fascinating given the government is now telling people whet your do and pretty much everyone is obeying the rules whereas when people were given some advice and not rules the advice was ignored
self sufficiency is an interesting one- was thinking about this. ‘Conspiracy theories’, people laugh but to me that means not instantly trusting what certain people tell you and doing the right thing yourself. It’s not the govt who have helped try to control this thing, they’ve cocked everything up, it’s us, we’re the ones inside, our leaders have failed us. We all have to be self sufficient, right from maybe not spending all your cash on stuff & things but having some set aside, not blindly accepting everything, not busily destroying the environment and having some common sense. Conspiracy theories aren’t about smashing up phone masts, it’s just about really asking whether what you’re being told is true and being sensible enough to do the smart thing. Politics has become a complete cult and they all lie, you’d have to be a complete simpleton right just accept what they tell you, that is a very different thing from thinking that the pigeons were being turned into drone robots.
even re-reading that I’m aware I’m not explaining clearly, I’m hung over, hopefully you get my drift...
Context as well. At that stage look man had played in the premier league etc.Snipping tool is your freind
All of which has proven beyond doubt that they don’t know how to protect people, they have changed their minds with the wind. People aren’t indoors because Hancock said so, they’re inside because they don’t want to end up on a ventilator and they have seen what is happening.
Bless you have lied again.This one is for you David
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Admit it, you've made yourself look a mug. Again.Context as well. At that stage look man had played in the premier league etc.
So yes he was a better player then.
Tom's fucked it yet again
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Goves we've had enough of experts statement has validated all sorts of fuckwittery. He's given licence to people to spread and believe a whole raft of ill conceived nonsense.
Why when you've clearly been lying and have just been caught out.Admit it, you've made yourself look a mug. Again.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
No it proves nothing of the sort - it proves that governments can remove what were sacred liberties and people will accept them and fall in line - they are exactly doing as Hancock tells them - if restrictions were removed yesterday and it was advisory beaches would be packed
like I said, people have to change because the leaders cannot and have not been able to protect their citizens. Our own govt swapped and changed their views multiple times before they had to hold their hands up and say “everyone inside”. Some countries still haven’t done that. The world we are all sending our children into is broken, which for me is the single worst thing about all of this, I dread it getting even worse by the time mine have to go out and face up to life, and I’m sure I’m not alone in that.
Context - I stated an opinion that I thought Maddison will be better than Lookman. You wrote the above, plus more shite.Why when you've clearly been lying and have just been caught out.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
You're screenshot shows that we were talking about them on that date he ce the us of is and not will be.Context - I stated an opinion that I thought Maddison will be better than Lookman. You wrote the above, plus more shite.
You're a liar and you've caught out, just own it.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Is tom. No will be.Context - I stated an opinion that I thought Maddison will be better than Lookman. You wrote the above, plus more shite.
You're a liar and you've caught out, just own it.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Sanctimonious twaddle
You can't call people a c**t and wriggle out of this one, you've been done.Is tom. No will be.
You lying c**t
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
What are we all arguing over this evening then ?
Whats on the agenda tonight ?
David's just calling me a c**t again so nothing new from my point of view.What are we all arguing over this evening then ?
Whats on the agenda tonight ?
Just tried to make head and tail of that Maddison argument Lads ?David's just calling me a c**t again so nothing new from my point of view.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
What are we all arguing over this evening then ?
Whats on the agenda tonight ?
Basically David said it was laughable to compare Maddison to Lookman in his very charming David way. This was the summer Maddison moved to Leicester so needless to say it didn't age well for him.Just tried to make head and tail of that Maddison argument Lads ?
Your credibility & relevance were pretty much gone when you were getting all revved up praising herd immunity and accusing the Chinese of infecting towns 200 miles away from them- with all due respect I am not overly concerned by your opinions at this stage.
Oh ffs tom you are lying again.You can't call people a c**t and wriggle out of this one, you've been done.
Lookman wasn't better than Maddison even then, Maddison moved to Leicester shortly after this, and after ripping up the championship, did pretty much the same in the prem.
You also stated Lookman wasn't surplus to requirements at Everton... he was.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?