No it proves nothing of the sort - it proves that governments can remove what were sacred liberties and people will accept them and fall in line - they are exactly doing as Hancock tells them - if restrictions were removed yesterday and it was advisory beaches would be packed
like I said, people have to change because the leaders cannot and have not been able to protect their citizens. Our own govt swapped and changed their views multiple times before they had to hold their hands up and say “everyone inside”. Some countries still haven’t done that. The world we are all sending our children into is broken, which for me is the single worst thing about all of this, I dread it getting even worse by the time mine have to go out and face up to life, and I’m sure I’m not alone in that.
You're screenshot shows that we were talking about them on that date he ce the us of is and not will be.Context - I stated an opinion that I thought Maddison will be better than Lookman. You wrote the above, plus more shite.
You're a liar and you've caught out, just own it.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Is tom. No will be.Context - I stated an opinion that I thought Maddison will be better than Lookman. You wrote the above, plus more shite.
You're a liar and you've caught out, just own it.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Sanctimonious twaddle
What are we all arguing over this evening then ?
Whats on the agenda tonight ?
David's just calling me a c**t again so nothing new from my point of view.What are we all arguing over this evening then ?
Whats on the agenda tonight ?
Just tried to make head and tail of that Maddison argument Lads ?David's just calling me a c**t again so nothing new from my point of view.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
What are we all arguing over this evening then ?
Whats on the agenda tonight ?
Your credibility & relevance were pretty much gone when you were getting all revved up praising herd immunity and accusing the Chinese of infecting towns 200 miles away from them- with all due respect I am not overly concerned by your opinions at this stage.
Oh ffs tom you are lying again.You can't call people a c**t and wriggle out of this one, you've been done.
Lookman wasn't better than Maddison even then, Maddison moved to Leicester shortly after this, and after ripping up the championship, did pretty much the same in the prem.
You also stated Lookman wasn't surplus to requirements at Everton... he was.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
What are we all arguing over this evening then ?
Whats on the agenda tonight ?
With respect I’ve posed several questions which you ignore and refuse to answer - you are very poor at debating actually. You are very good at diversions and nonsense like this and you enjoy the attention
This latest hypothesis of yours is absurd. Hancock is a very little insignificant man and now is acting like a cheap dictator. In the past such characters would have been told to do one. Now he can make threats to remove more liberties and people are more frightened of the consequences from Hancock than the reality of the virus
Cummings is about as conservative as Karl Marx and he will be taking note as to how people can be controlled and directed.
Businesses and people’s lives are being destroyed forever - some have survived far greater threats than this but we now see a government that can completely close the country down and all people like you obsess with is irrelevant sideshow nonsense that will be forgotten the day Mr Hancock gives people permission to breathe again
Mr Cummings will be very pleased with you
Oh you are lying once again tom.Basically David said it was laughable to compare Maddison to Lookman in his very charming David way. This was the summer Maddison moved to Leicester so needless to say it didn't age well for him.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
You are very good at diversions and nonsense like this and you enjoy the attention
Whatever you like pal, I'm just not interested tbh.
Screenshot lad. Screenshot.This one is for you David
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
The conversation you said never happened, you then decided to pretend I said a lot of other things.I'm using a phone...
Where's the lie? You've been caught out as a liar and won't own it. You said the conversation never happened, it did.
If you said you have so many pointless arguments you forgot about it, I'd believe that, but you didn't.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Yep, if tom would of linked to the whole thread he'd have been in trouble
Looks like one of those pictures you used to need 3d specs forScreenshot lad. Screenshot.
Grenners has posted the thread mate you're done. You also claim playing well in the championship is as good as playing well in the BundesligaExcept it did and now everyone can see what a liar you are.
Yes I know you can screenshot on a phone, obviously. I find the search on this app clunky for older posts so logged on the lappy and quickly took a photo, I wasn't hoping to win any contests for my photography.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
You said he'd be straight in the everton team. They player he would place is Sigurdsson ergo he is better than.Never said Championship was as good as Bundesliga, never said he was better than Sigurdsson. You're lying again.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Davy Klassen, who JM was not better than in may 2018.Can you even remember the Dutch player you're on about David?
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
This was may 2018 he was a Dutch international.That world beater who played 7 times for Everton? JM was literally bossing it in the prem very shortly after this.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
No mate, but not far away.Notleys!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?