Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (4 Viewers)

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Not really Pete, we need to try to get back to some kind of normality so why shouldn’t they go back to their offices ? It’s been ok for supermarket workers, NHS workers etc etc to work through the peak and be around vast numbers of people who might have covid but not ok for people to go back to offices (who are likely to be following various distancing/prevention measures) when current infection numbers are low ?

I’ve avoided the misery of this thread for a while as any bit of good news is usually like finding a needle in a haystack but thought Id post just to bring some perspective to the numbers, horrific as they are.

  • Theres at least one pre existing health condition in over 90% of Covid deaths
  • If you are obese you are three times more likely to die from covid and seven times more like to need a ventilator
  • Up to 31 May, there were zero deaths in the age range 0-14 years where Covid was the underlying cause
  • Out of every 100 people who die from Covid between 85-90 are over the age of 65
  • Only around two out of every 100 deaths are under the age of 50
There are also a number of social, cultural and ethnic impacts on the numbers some of which are unlikely to impact a vast number of people

I’ll let far brighter people on here than me crunch the numbers any which way they want but we live in a population of say 70m, they reckon anywhere between 3m-6m have probably had Covid, yet only say 5k-6k of working age population have died from it, a vast majority of which have had at least one pre existing condition and/or were obese.

There will always be heart breaking anomalies, as there are with many unfair early deaths but people who want to stop the country getting back to some kind of normal need to take a reality check, by doing so, far more people will have their lives damaged/destroyed. If you are young and relatively healthy then the chances of you dying from Covid appear tiny.

Protect/shield the elderly and those most at risk, continue to take precautions (face makes in confined spaces) and wash your hands regularly but most really should just start living their lives again

...you won’t be surprised to hear I’ll be off down the boozer again later....just doing my bit ; )

My god, you're an intelligent person but your slavish towing of the Tory line is ridiculous. How is the 'need' to get back to 'normality' i.e. Thousands commuting rather than working from home for no productive reason greater than the need to protect public health?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
hence the numbers quoted. Look at the high streets, we’re taking about hundreds of thousands of jobs/livelihoods (directly/indirectly attached to retail, leisure and hospitality) that are currently at risk. There is a need and the risk is currently minimal.

if there’s a spike then of course additional steps need to be take again but currently more people need to be returning to work/offices and normality

The point for me is it's shown how fragile the way we work the economy is and reliant on the status quo. So for me what that means is a rethink on how things work, how we can change and adapt to those changes and become more robust. Instead it's just 'let's get back to the way things were'.

It's a massive opportunity missed. This could well be the defining moment where we had the chance to pull away from self-destruction and said "nah, fuck it"
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
My god, you're an intelligent person but your slavish towing of the Tory line is ridiculous. How is the 'need' to get back to 'normality' i.e. Thousands commuting rather than working from home for no productive reason greater than the need to protect public health?

Nothing to do with following anyone’s line Fernando. Unfortunately, that’s the stock response to anyone who doesn’t agree with peoples arguments on here.

I’m not saying everyone needs to go back into work, in actual fact I think one of the few benefits of this whole shitstorm will be more people WFH which is better for the environment and people’s work/life balance. However, there is no need for a vast majority of the population to be WFH all the time. Cities are currently ghost towns as I’d imagine only 5-10% are going in (I’ve been into Birmingham a couple of times in the week recently). Many businesses are/will soon be on there knees. I know of at least three independent bars/restaurants that have already closed and that’s with furlough scheme in place.

If guidelines are followed and workplaces are safe why shouldn’t employers ask staff to return? Even if it’s on a rota of 50% in one week and 50% the next to allow for social distancing/minimise risk further.

If employers want their staff to WFH, then again, that’s fine, but let’s not make this about the risks attached to Covid for most people.

I’ve put my view forward backed up by facts surrounding the limited risks involved for a majority of the working population. If people want to stay at home still that’s their prerogative but I for one, will try to live my life as best/normally as I can (that’s nothing to do with towing the Tory line, that’s just how I view life)
 
Last edited:

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
The point for me is it's shown how fragile the way we work the economy is and reliant on the status quo. So for me what that means is a rethink on how things work, how we can change and adapt to those changes and become more robust. Instead it's just 'let's get back to the way things were'.

It's a massive opportunity missed. This could well be the defining moment where we had the chance to pull away from self-destruction and said "nah, fuck it"

I think loads of businesses will be having a massive rethink SBD and there will definitely be far more WFH in future if productivity has remaining the same or higher, due to the massive cost savings and also giving their employees a better work/life balance

You cannot change the whole structure of large parts of the economy overnight without it costing hundreds of thousands (or more) of jobs though
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Nothing to do with following anyone’s line Fernando. Unfortunately, that’s the stock response to anyone who doesn’t agree with peoples arguments on here.

I’m not saying everyone needs to go back into work, in actual fact I think one of the few benefits of this whole shitstorm will be more people WFH which is better for the environment and people’s work/life balance. However, there is no need for a vast majority of the population to be WFH all the time. Citys are currently ghost towns as I’d imagine only 5-10% are going in (I’ve been into Birmingham a couple of times in the week recently). Many businesses are/will soon be on there knees. I know of at least three independent bars/restaurants that have already closed and that’s with furlough scheme in place.

If guidelines are followed and workplaces are safe why shouldn’t employers ask staff to return? Even if it’s on a rota of 50% in one week and 50% the next to allow for social distancing/minimise risk further.

If employers want their staff to WFH, then again, that’s fine, but let’s not make this about the risks attached to Covid for most people.

I’ve put my view forward backed up by facts surrounding the limited risks involved for a majority of the working population. If people want to stay at home still that’s their prerogative but I for one, will try to live my life as best/normally as I can (that’s nothing to do with towing the Tory line, that’s just how I view life)

The thing that would give people the confidence to 'get back to normal' would be if the government showed any genuine intention of getting this virus under control. Until then, forget it. Trying another blame the people emotional blackmail about businesses going to the wall is just abhorrent.

They tried the 'shield the vulnerable but every body else crack on' in early March, look at what an utter disaster that was. I have no confidence a single lesson has been learnt from then.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Nothing to do with following anyone’s line Fernando. Unfortunately, that’s the stock response to anyone who doesn’t agree with peoples arguments on here.

I’m not saying everyone needs to go back into work, in actual fact I think one of the few benefits of this whole shitstorm will be more people WFH which is better for the environment and people’s work/life balance. However, there is no need for a vast majority of the population to be WFH all the time. Cities are currently ghost towns as I’d imagine only 5-10% are going in (I’ve been into Birmingham a couple of times in the week recently). Many businesses are/will soon be on there knees. I know of at least three independent bars/restaurants that have already closed and that’s with furlough scheme in place.

If guidelines are followed and workplaces are safe why shouldn’t employers ask staff to return? Even if it’s on a rota of 50% in one week and 50% the next to allow for social distancing/minimise risk further.

If employers want their staff to WFH, then again, that’s fine, but let’s not make this about the risks attached to Covid for most people.

I’ve put my view forward backed up by facts surrounding the limited risks involved for a majority of the working population. If people want to stay at home still that’s their prerogative but I for one, will try to live my life as best/normally as I can (that’s nothing to do with towing the Tory line, that’s just how I view life)

There is also proven now to be no need for people to travel, waste time and energy they don't need to to get somewhere they don't really need to be. To prop up other businesses.

How about we rethink things. We have a shortage of homes. If we don't need as much office/retail space we can build more places to live in their place. If we build high quality apartment blocks lower floors can serve the residents of the block along with passing local trade. Delivery sector could be expanded (which would then take over the commuter traffic).

Of course that can't be done overnight but neither could the move from factories and turning them into business/retail parks. But it happened. Now we need to see it again with a transition from office to residential. Opportunities for many construction jobs and jobs involving upkeep long term. It would be an absolutely disaster to just go back to how it was before.

Don't just look at the costs, look at the opportunities.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
There is also proven now to be no need for people to travel, waste time and energy they don't need to to get somewhere they don't really need to be. To prop up other businesses.

How about we rethink things. We have a shortage of homes. If we don't need as much office/retail space we can build more places to live in their place. If we build high quality apartment blocks lower floors can serve the residents of the block along with passing local trade. Delivery sector could be expanded (which would then take over the commuter traffic).

Of course that can't be done overnight but neither could the move from factories and turning them into business/retail parks. But it happened. Now we need to see it again with a transition from office to residential. Opportunities for many construction jobs and jobs involving upkeep long term. It would be an absolutely disaster to just go back to how it was before.

Don't just look at the costs, look at the opportunities.

Cant disagree with most of that SBD. As I said earlier a lot of businesses will already be looking to change their working practices but as I also said it can’t happen overnight without it negatively impacting hundreds of thousands or more.

There will definitely be loads of office conversions as businesses likely to downsize/reduce office space, was discussing that with my mate a few weeks back.

ps the costs are huge numbers of people’s livelihoods in the short/medium term
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Cant disagree with most of that SBD. As I said earlier a lot of businesses will already be looking to change their working practices but as I also said it can’t happen overnight without it negatively impacting hundreds of thousands or more.

There will definitely be loads of office conversions as businesses likely to downsize/reduce office space, was discussing that with my mate a few weeks back.

ps the costs are huge numbers of people’s livelihoods in the short/medium term

It would result in quite a significant effect on people short/mid term but we can manage that over a period of time to minimise it as much as possible or stick our head in the sand and continue how it was before until companies decide to do it themselves and it all happens at once making it much worse overall.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Self isolation back for those returning from Spain as of 12 Tonight.
Had a leaflet through the door today pushing all sorts of conspiracy theories .
Not.sure where it came from or it's purpose as all that stuff is available on the net.
Can Only think it must be to maybe reach the old and vulnerable.
 

pipkin73

Well-Known Member
It's going to destroy us, we have only just opened back up. We are still clear apart from those refugees arriving by boat and they are being stopped before they land (loads of helicopters checking everyday for them). It mainly Madrid and Barcelona, we are thousands of miles away. I just give in!!!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Self isolation back for those returning from Spain as of 12 Tonight.
Had a leaflet through the door today pushing all sorts of conspiracy theories .
Not.sure where it came from or it's purpose as all that stuff is available on the net.
Can Only think it must be to maybe reach the old and vulnerable.
UK has had nearly 800 daily infections, Spain nearly 1000, it seems a bit rich. The cynic in me thinks it's an economic measure not a health one
 

pipkin73

Well-Known Member
UK has had nearly 800 daily infections, Spain nearly 1000, it seems a bit rich. The cynic in me thinks it's an economic measure not a health one
Like i said mate, we have only just opened back up and if they keep Gran Canaria on that list it will destory us. Loads of places been refurbished during the close in season (hotels, restaurants and bars), and if no tourists we will just all be broke. I might as well fly back home tomorrow and get it done and dusted with. Not much chance of a job from what i read and back on the painkillers (thanks Boris). We are safe, we are not effin Madrid or Barcelona (person i know just went to Madrid for a week and came back after 3 days) as NO RESTRICTIONS IN PUBS, NO ONE WEARING MASKS he said it was like nothing had ever happened. If they want to live like that fine but don't make us pay for it thousands of mile away on another island who have obeyed the rules and got the virus levels down to almost nil.
 

pipkin73

Well-Known Member
Wish i could put Boris in chains and make him listen to the average working person, everytime he comes out with shit electrocute him (only a small mild shock but rising). From my point of view living abroad between this and brexit he could have 4 million brits returning back, is he and his government ready for that, to house us, welfare and more NHS strain? He needs to look at the bigger picture on all of this. I know 4 million people arriving back is only the size of half of London BUT it's the size of Birmingham, Liverpool, Nottingham & Sheffield plus lods of room left for the outskirts. He can't just ignore europe, to many of us live there and he can't afford us back Population of Cities in United Kingdom (2020)
 

Crazy daisy

New Member
Like i said mate, we have only just opened back up and if they keep Gran Canaria on that list it will destory us. Loads of places been refurbished during the close in season (hotels, restaurants and bars), and if no tourists we will just all be broke. I might as well fly back home tomorrow and get it done and dusted with. Not much chance of a job from what i read and back on the painkillers (thanks Boris). We are safe, we are not effin Madrid or Barcelona (person i know just went to Madrid for a week and came back after 3 days) as NO RESTRICTIONS IN PUBS, NO ONE WEARING MASKS he said it was like nothing had ever happened. If they want to live like that fine but don't make us pay for it thousands of mile away on another island who have obeyed the rules and got the virus levels down to almost nil.
I'm currently in Barcelona and nobody is allowed in bars. You get served outside and masks are mandatory even outside.
 

pipkin73

Well-Known Member
I'm currently in Barcelona and nobody is allowed in bars. You get served outside and masks are mandatory even outside.
Brilliant, atl east they are trying, like i said the person i know off went to Madrid. The reason i mention Barcelona is it's up their with Madid on new cases.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Seems to me that this is just a cynical attempt to look tough after the horse has bolted. When 1000+ people were dying a day in Spain there was no control and no quarantine, now they’ve got a couple of hundred more cases, that’s cases not deaths, a day than us it’s time to say you have to self isolate when you return. Load of bollocks.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Self isolation back for those returning from Spain as of 12 Tonight.
Had a leaflet through the door today pushing all sorts of conspiracy theories .
Not.sure where it came from or it's purpose as all that stuff is available on the net.
Can Only think it must be to maybe reach the old and vulnerable.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Seems to me that this is just a cynical attempt to look tough after the horse has bolted. When 1000+ people were dying a day in Spain there was no control and no quarantine, now they’ve got a couple of hundred more cases, that’s cases not deaths, a day than us it’s time to say you have to self isolate when you return. Load of bollocks.
I think it's an economic thing, make it difficult to go abroad on holiday so money is spent here. Tbh the govt are right, foreign holidays could be put on the back burner for a year.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Surely they'll exempt the canary islands?

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

pipkin73

Well-Known Member
I think it's an economic thing, make it difficult to go abroad on holiday so money is spent here. Tbh the govt are right, foreign holidays could be put on the back burner for a year.
Not if you want to come next year mate, or you can come have the beach but nothing else as all bust. Most bar owners in Spain and here including staff (tourist areas only) are UK and Irish based so 1 year with no income will crash it all. Spoke to loads of owners and they are now on a wing and prayer.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
I do have a certain sympathy with the argument that we've effectively been put under house arrest for a few months, and that's a dangerous precedent to give the state so much control.

That being said, masks are nothing compared to everything else that's happened, so it seems a very strange thing to get hung up on! Sure, they're uncomfortable and a bit awkward, but I'll get used to it.
Been wearing one on a daily basis for a couple of months now, only problem is they’re not much fun in 35c heat.
 

Macca

Well-Known Member
The pretence of a strategy is laughable now. It’s just fingers crossed and hope for the best out there. Then get tough on things like returning from the Canary Islands that will make no odds
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Don’t worry, Raab has been doing the rounds to clear up any confusion

And basically confirmed that it’s just a cynical stab at looking tough. They’ll be playing the “we made people quarantine” card for months if not years to come when being criticised for their response.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top