fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
That's a crank site
That's a crank siteyes, so that is an anomaly the other way, but the "knocked off your bike" was removed from the count today as yes it was nonsense, that is why it was removed . Please read up . This was only in England not the rest of the uk. Basically over time the death rate from covid would have been 100% as eventually they would have all died. This is removing this anomaly
UK 'overestimates' coronavirus death toll: study
Britain ordered an urgent review Friday into how coronavirus deaths are counted after a study suggested health authorities are overestimating the toll by counting people who died long after recovering.medicalxpress.com
You are wrong"A patient who has tested positive, but successfully treated and discharged from hospital, will still be counted as a COVID death even if they had a heart attack or were run over by a bus three months later,"
you really are in a different world
And you also think it acceptable to insult . I suggest you both open your mind and educate yourself - as from all of your posts, there is something clearly lacking
Previously anyone who has ever tested positive for the virus in England was automatically counted as a coronavirus death when they died,
beyond words.......
Basically if you ever had covid and at some point died you were included irrespective of how you died. Even if you were knocked over by a bus. (was what I said)
So your evidence that someone was definitely added to the cogvid death total after being run over by a bus (is what you translated that into)
Hopefully you can see the failure in your comprehension
so to not mess with your condition further I will say, yes you are of course right. Thankyou so much for pointing this out - well done. Note to self (must do better)
You are wrong
I am 100% not denying what I said. And nor am I a c**t. but that says more about you if that is what you resort toHe's now claiming he didn't actually say any of what he said tonight
Hang on a second. Is this just the daily figure out out by Public Health England that has been changed?
People have been pointing to excess deaths and the ONS stats as more accurate since this began.
Still it’s a nice distraction for the government rather than having to actually deal with the issue
I am 100% not denying what I said. And nor am I a c**t. but that says more about you if that is what you resort to
I will leave you 1 more piece of reading except bbc use the analogy of a car crash
Coronavirus: England death count review reduces UK toll by 5,000 - BBC News
Deaths recorded in England had included people who tested positive months before they died.www.google.co.uk
Back in the day, at a well-known bookseller, somebody ordered this:The guy who wants a partner to watch dogs go at it is fascinating, yet I'm drawn to the person whose dislikes solely mention Indiana Jones. There's a trauma there
No, the deaths still occurred and they've just put an arbitrary time limit of 28 days from infection when a death that a doctor has recorded was caused by COVID-19 can be included in the stats. It's the usual smoke and mirror tactic.
Coronavirus: Greencore staff self-isolate after outbreak
Health officials are working with the sandwich makers in Northampton, where 299 tested positive.www.bbc.co.uk
300 positive tests in a sandwich factory in Northampton. All of whom work there so I would guess there will be plenty of family and friends also being confirmed in the next few days.
Off the top of my head we've had breakouts in meat processing factories in Wrexham and Anglesey too in recent weeks - places that you would imagine have had to follow social distancing particularly carefully. Is this a sign of how easily and quickly the virus will spread in the cooler winter climate?
Coronavirus: Greencore staff self-isolate after outbreak
Health officials are working with the sandwich makers in Northampton, where 299 tested positive.www.bbc.co.uk
300 positive tests in a sandwich factory in Northampton. All of whom work there so I would guess there will be plenty of family and friends also being confirmed in the next few days.
Off the top of my head we've had breakouts in meat processing factories in Wrexham and Anglesey too in recent weeks - places that you would imagine have had to follow social distancing particularly carefully. Is this a sign of how easily and quickly the virus will spread in the cooler winter climate?
No for me its another sign that we have to get on with it because social distancing doesnt take place in a lot of places of work
Mrs Wightman said Greencore had "highly effective measures in place and they continue to work extremely hard to exceed the requirements needed to be Covid-19 secure within the workplace".
She said the outbreak was "about how people behave outside of Greencore, not at work," adding if people failed to follow the rules "a possible local lockdown will follow".
Oh well it must be true if a spokesman for a company trying to cover its arse says it instead of what people see on a daily basis
Lucy Wightman, Director of Public Health at Northamptonshire County Council
Have you read the article?
I work in a non office based environment. Got friends too, amazingly enough. I haven't even said anything about this, but you apopear to be talking about something completely different to this article. It suggests you're just jumping on something to peddle your nonsense again, and it seems to suit your rhetoric to ignore completely everything that article says.End of the day, speak to people working in sectors such as retail, warehousing, delivery, childcare. Basically anything that isnt office based.
Yes i have. But its suits your rhetoric doesnt it. Like when something anti tory is posted it must be nailed on truth. ( and im neither labour mor tory, couldnt give a fuck)
End of the day, speak to people working in sectors such as retail, warehousing, delivery, childcare. Basically anything that isnt office based.
To the outside its all 'Covid certified safe'.
Is it bollocks. It's nigh on impossible without shedding a shitload of staff
I'm not even saying that though! I'm saying a lockdown is planned to cut it back if things don't improve, and it's not just the factory that's at fault, but it's Northampton people relaxing outside too.Tbf I'm inclined to see saddles point on this.
Internationally there have been cases too .And farming.
Sure some will have done thing's outside of work the Gov't has deened ok .
When its endemic in a workplace across most staff something is wrong .
Demographic of staff probably younger ,female? Maybe , ethnically diverse maybe?
Low paid yes.
No support if not working.
I think we Owe as much to these people who've kept the supply chains going as much as to the medics in all honesty .
Shouldn't forget that.
Article or not, my point stands, im not getting into an argument about it.
An absolute shit tonne of companies are not doing as they say they are to the outside world to follow regs. This needs clamping down on.
And as i say, how many people with a cough or sniffle are going to work anyway as losing 2 weeks full pay can result in them not being able to pay bills? Holes in the system everywhere
Absolutely right!!!That was a problem even before COVID. I’m fairly certain I had it and was left with bronchitis as well right at the start, just before lockdown. I was told in no uncertain terms I wasn’t allowed to self isolate. There’s a ridiculous culture of presenteeism and being in the office at all costs. At least the latter seems to have calmed down.
That was a problem even before COVID. I’m fairly certain I had it and was left with bronchitis as well right at the start, just before lockdown. I was told in no uncertain terms I wasn’t allowed to self isolate. There’s a ridiculous culture of presenteeism and being in the office at all costs. At least the latter seems to have calmed down.
I'd assume as it is now, people will *have* to be off, with even the slightest thing.The rational approach is that people coming into the office with a sniffle should be ostracised, not the other way around.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?