Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (5 Viewers)

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
How are there any positive tests if no one can get one done?
I suppose the worrying / positive thing is how many cases there could actually be.

Forget our opinions though, this balls up means we're limiting our understanding of it, and what we need to fight, and whether we need to, anyway. We're still clueless as to figures, and that's disgraceful six months down the line.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Anybody else with young children been offered a flu jab this year? I took my lad for one this morning. He's never been offered one before. Got me thinking about the change in the law and the proposed exemption for needing a license for a flu vaccine. Perhaps it's for inventory as much as anything else.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
Just been up to the ricoh as still cannot get a test.

Cannot just turn up (as i thought) but got told can only book online. When i explained look i need a test result for the purposes of work paying me/thinking I'm taking the piss it was 'well if you cant get a test online then there's nothing we can do'

I know they're doing their job but its empty. Standing round doing absolutely shit all
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Just been up to the ricoh as still cannot get a test.

Cannot just turn up (as i thought) but got told can only book online. When i explained look i need a test result for the purposes of work paying me/thinking I'm taking the piss it was 'well if you cant get a test online then there's nothing we can do'

I know they're doing their job but its empty. Standing round doing absolutely shit all

I’m coughing intermittently with sneezes and a headache but what you’re saying worries me because I can’t afford a few weeks off thanks to a cold
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
I’m coughing intermittently with sneezes and a headache but what you’re saying worries me because I can’t afford a few weeks off thanks to a cold


I understand why you're worried, same here, which is why its such a travesty we cant get a test.

How many people are going to be the same as us and cant afford time off so will go into work thinking 'just a cold' and unwittingly spread the virus


All because tests are impossible to get
 

Walsgrave

Well-Known Member
Just been up to the ricoh as still cannot get a test.

Cannot just turn up (as i thought) but got told can only book online. When i explained look i need a test result for the purposes of work paying me/thinking I'm taking the piss it was 'well if you cant get a test online then there's nothing we can do'

I know they're doing their job but its empty. Standing round doing absolutely shit all
Worst thing about these people is that they get paid for standing around doing nothing, so they have no incentive to use their discretion. Its typical of all kinds of compliance officers - they just push the problem away so they don't have to do anything.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I understand why you're worried, same here, which is why its such a travesty we cant get a test.

How many people are going to be the same as us and cant afford time off so will go into work thinking 'just a cold' and unwittingly spread the virus


All because tests are impossible to get

Going off a few weeks into term will have my classes playing catch up from an early stage, really not what I want.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I’m coughing intermittently with sneezes and a headache but what you’re saying worries me because I can’t afford a few weeks off thanks to a cold

I do think they’re prioritising teachers. God knows though. Just saw an MP on Twitter saying the same as me and saddlebrains had: nothing at all online but empty test centres that won’t take you unless you book online.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Worst thing about these people is that they get paid for standing around doing nothing, so they have no incentive to use their discretion. Its typical of all kinds of compliance officers - they just push the problem away so they don't have to do anything.

Theyve been told to stop taking people without booking apparently (again according to this MP on Twitter). If the booking system worked that’s fair enough, but clearly it doesn’t.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I do think they’re prioritising teachers. God knows though. Just saw an MP on Twitter saying the same as me and saddlebrains had: nothing at all online but empty test centres that won’t take you unless you book online.

That’s something, though as I don’t drive it’ll be interesting getting it done.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
Seems this is a country wide problem. How the hell is it not front page news?

All the hallmarks of a second wave and no one can get a test
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20200914-105043_Twitter.jpg
    Screenshot_20200914-105043_Twitter.jpg
    577.6 KB · Views: 18
  • Screenshot_20200914-105018_Twitter.jpg
    Screenshot_20200914-105018_Twitter.jpg
    569.8 KB · Views: 18

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Worst thing about these people is that they get paid for standing around doing nothing, so they have no incentive to use their discretion. Its typical of all kinds of compliance officers - they just push the problem away so they don't have to do anything.
It isn't their fault, don't fall into the trap of blaming under utilised people for the piss poor service design from DH & Serco
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
It isn't their fault, don't fall into the trap of blaming under utilised people for the piss poor service design from DH & Serco


Agreed. The woman in question was quite Blasé about it however, basically admitting they do fuck all everyday which is irritating.

Not her fault though, as you say its the clusterfuck of a government who have caused this
 

Walsgrave

Well-Known Member
It isn't their fault, don't fall into the trap of blaming under utilised people for the piss poor service design from DH & Serco
Agreed, I take back the literal statement :) Annoying how we have a situation where it has to be like that - in an ideal world the service would work and I wouldn't be scapegoating these people who clearly have very little to do.
Theyve been told to stop taking people without booking apparently (again according to this MP on Twitter). If the booking system worked that’s fair enough, but clearly it doesn’t.
As above, yep. Resources going where they should not be going and money being thrown down the drain.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Don’t worry though Grendel knows it doesn’t affect anyone under 65

Of course it does but its a tiny tiny proportion of the population. The response has to be proportionate - more of that age group will die of alcohol and drug abuse and wreckless driving - will you ban all those things to protect the tiny few?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Of course it does but its a tiny tiny proportion of the population. The response has to be proportionate - more of that age group will die of alcohol and drug abuse and wreckless driving - will you ban all those things to protect the tiny few?

.... we do ban drug abuse. And wreckless driving.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
.... we do ban drug abuse. And wreckless driving.

We don't as you have admitted and indeed boasted of a drug habit I believe - so its a passive response. Also banning drivers who have already killed themselves is not a ban is it - and all stats prove young drivers are far more at risk of an early death than from the dreaded COVID. Also its very odd as the BLM protests were blatant infringements of any "rules" at the time were they not and yet I suspect Pete would not be reporting them but would if 7 people turned up at a house next door.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
We don't as you have admitted and indeed boasted of a drug habit I believe - so its a passive response. Also banning drivers who have already killed themselves is not a ban is it - and all stats prove young drivers are far more at risk of an early death than from the dreaded COVID. Also its very odd as the BLM protests were blatant infringements of any "rules" at the time were they not and yet I suspect Pete would not be reporting them but would if 7 people turned up at a house next door.
New drivers only get 6 point allowance for the first two years from passing their test. It’s illegal to be in possession of drugs. There’s deterrence from taking action that can harm you. Why should it be any different for a pandemic that’s killing people?
 
Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
We don't as you have admitted and indeed boasted of a drug habit I believe - so its a passive response. Also banning drivers who have already killed themselves is not a ban is it - and all stats prove young drivers are far more at risk of an early death than from the dreaded COVID. Also its very odd as the BLM protests were blatant infringements of any "rules" at the time were they not and yet I suspect Pete would not be reporting them but would if 7 people turned up at a house next door.

I used to smoke weed yes. That was as illegal if not more illegal than any coronavirus measures. Wreckless driving is always illegal too even if you don’t kill anyone.

You’re desperate.

According to this Statistics on Drug Misuse, England, 2019 - NHS Digital there were just under 3000 drug related deaths all last year. That’s across all age groups.

There have been over 600 15-44 year old confirmed COVID deaths April to August this year. So extrapolated that’s just under half, of we assume all drug deaths are the same age group (they won’t be) with severe methods to stop the disease which we wouldn’t consider for drugs.

Clearly even if we pretended people over 45 don’t count for some reason COVID is more of a threat to young lives than drugs are.

BTW considering some of your alcohol fuelled posts over lockdown, Id be careful looking down on others that abuse substances if I were you.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I'm interested to understand whether there are any people suffering with long covid / post viral fatigue who were infected after the initial peak

Looking at that story above, this quote jumped out at me:

“If I had known that I’d be this ill, I would have taken everything a lot more seriously back in March,” Russell said. “But all that we heard back then was that if you were infected and you were a young person, you’d most likely not have any symptoms at all. Or you’d be ill for a couple of weeks and that would be it.”

That's bollocks. Back in March the advice was that it was a novel virus the effects of which were not clear.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Of course it does but its a tiny tiny proportion of the population. The response has to be proportionate - more of that age group will die of alcohol and drug abuse and wreckless driving - will you ban all those things to protect the tiny few?

This is correct. I’m not sure how many tests were carried out last week but guessing around 1.2m and out of those only around 20k actually had it. Around 1.7% (of people who thought they had it have actually got it). Obviously there’s a stack of people who haven’t been able to be tested who think they’ve got it, but far more who don’t think they’ve got it/haven’t got it.

Thats not excusing the testing capacity (lab) issue which I still haven’t seen reasoning/justification for, just a little perspective.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
This is correct. I’m not sure how many tests were carried out last week but guessing around 1.2m and out of those only around 20k actually had it. Around 1.7% (of people who thought they had it have actually got it). Obviously there’s a stack of people who haven’t been able to be tested who think they’ve got it, but far more who don’t think they’ve got it/haven’t got it.

Thats not excusing the testing capacity (lab) issue which I still haven’t seen reasoning/justification for, just a little perspective.
Aren’t they double counting the tests so the actual number of people being tested is about half of the number of tests?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
This is correct. I’m not sure how many tests were carried out last week but guessing around 1.2m and out of those only around 20k actually had it. Around 1.7% (of people who thought they had it have actually got it). Obviously there’s a stack of people who haven’t been able to be tested who think they’ve got it, but far more who don’t think they’ve got it/haven’t got it.

Thats not excusing the testing capacity (lab) issue which I still haven’t seen reasoning/justification for, just a little perspective.

The positive cases to tests ratio is rising sharply
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
The positive cases to tests ratio is rising sharply

Im not saying it’s not increasing but it’s still a fraction of the population. I was just looking for the latest national sampling figures as that should give a reasonable indication, can’t see them at the moment and got some work to do. Will check
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
This is correct. I’m not sure how many tests were carried out last week but guessing around 1.2m and out of those only around 20k actually had it. Around 1.7% (of people who thought they had it have actually got it). Obviously there’s a stack of people who haven’t been able to be tested who think they’ve got it, but far more who don’t think they’ve got it/haven’t got it.

Thats not excusing the testing capacity (lab) issue which I still haven’t seen reasoning/justification for, just a little perspective.

bit desperate tbh
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top