Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (286 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Thats what I’m thinking:

December: Last minute thin gruel deal achieved and hailed as massive success by press.

Jan: Say we need to negotiate full deal and this will be proper Brexit, should last the next five years.
There's already a narrative being pushed that any failings with Brexit are somehow the fault of remainers. Would hope that wouldn't stick as its clearly ridiculous but nothing would surprise me.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting read about transmission aboard a flight that was less than 25% full

 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
There's already a narrative being pushed that any failings with Brexit are somehow the fault of remainers. Would hope that wouldn't stick as its clearly ridiculous but nothing would surprise me.
Was going to say the same thing. They’ll be plenty happy to buy into it.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
While getting results quickly is obviously a good thing the cynic in me fears we're a step away from a £120 a time charge for attending events, seeing family etc.

97% success rate offers a fair old chance of a Covid lottery
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
97% success rate offers a fair old chance of a Covid lottery
Yep I’ve seen some maths on this and although 97% sounds pretty accurate it’s a huge number of people that could be affected very quickly with false negatives or false positives. Shouldn’t be allowed really. For instance 500,000 tests at 97% is 15000 mistakes and if they each have 20 close contacts that’s another 18000 potentially not being told or being told incorrectly to isolate
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Yep I’ve seen some maths on this and although 97% sounds pretty accurate it’s a huge number of people that could be affected very quickly with false negatives or false positives. Shouldn’t be allowed really. For instance 500,000 tests at 97% is 15000 mistakes and if they each have 20 close contacts that’s another 18000 potentially not being told or being told incorrectly to isolate
this is why no tech for project moonshot exists. nothing is accurate enough
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
this is why no tech for project moonshot exists. nothing is accurate enough
I get that,but is 97% better than the ratio of PCR tests and subsequent t&t ?
Then the error rate applied reflects the prevailing rate in the community,not the entire potential error margin?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting read about transmission aboard a flight that was less than 25% full

Interesting fp,not really what I want to read currently though , anxiety through the roof due to family travelling currently.😒
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Yep I’ve seen some maths on this and although 97% sounds pretty accurate it’s a huge number of people that could be affected very quickly with false negatives or false positives. Shouldn’t be allowed really. For instance 500,000 tests at 97% is 15000 mistakes and if they each have 20 close contacts that’s another 18000 potentially not being told or being told incorrectly to isolate

People isolating when they may not need to is far less of an issue that people not isolating when they do need to.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Agreed it’s a terrible target but I think this government are best understood by looking at their decisions through the culture war lens. As you point out yourself it’s the only game Cummings knows. They end up U-turning on everything eventually so letting labour win doesn’t seem a viable explanation. Look at the situation with Burnham. All those negotiations and the support turns up anyway, the whole thing was an orchestrated charade to create some scape goats.
Ah yes politicking!
It was pretty obvious.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Seems that staff at George Eliot have received a memo from the chief exec, Glen Burley, regarding vaccinations:

Fingers crossed there is something to this and not just a case of crossed wires. Think knowing there is a light at the end of the tunnel would be great for people. Might also help persuade people to stick to the rules if they know there's an end in sight.
There are some who suggest this might be a problem with the rush, that any subsequent versions may struggle to become established even if better , something around inability to measure between various versions.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting read about transmission aboard a flight that was less than 25% full

Economics will prevail and get in the way , flying to hubs cancelling flights or transferring to pool users.
Anyone see the pictures of Rhodes airport over the weekend?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I'm not interested in how shit the tories are - I don't think anyone is really in disagreement.

A debate on the virus and opinions/insight into certain things without wanking one off would be great though.

Sure, what are your views on temporary school closures as a means to curb the spread more effectively than telling a pub to close at 10 pm? Particularly as ‘the science’ shows it will affect the R number to a much greater extent
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
The problem is the Tories are the ones carrying out this bollocks hence they’re bound to get mentioned. Politics is infringing on us now more than it has in a long time

Yes, I don't disagree with that. My point was that this thread is going off on many tangents to suit certain posters personal political narratives and it is a bit boring to have to sift through. There is another million threads for that.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
But work has been closed because of Covid. But schools are the main drivers of new cases. But I’m an educator not a babysitter
Yup. Bonkers to shut down places, and leave the areas where most transmission happens open.

You want to flatten it so there's a vague hope of a 'nomal' Christmas? There's an obvious answer, and we've not taken it. Of course, it' highly likely they'll relax restrictions for the day or something bonkers, so everybody can catch Covid off everyone else, then pop back to school / uni to exacerbate it, and then we're... doomed.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I get that,but is 97% better than the ratio of PCR tests and subsequent t&t ?
Then the error rate applied reflects the prevailing rate in the community,not the entire potential error margin?
no it just as other have pointed out can lead to large numbers of false positives or negatives

You can not do mass testing at 97%
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Koi
Yup. Bonkers to shut down places, and leave the areas where most transmission happens open.

You want to flatten it so there's a vague hope of a 'nomal' Christmas? There's an obvious answer, and we've not taken it. Of course, it' highly likely they'll relax restrictions for the day or something bonkers, so everybody can catch Covid off everyone else, then pop back to school / uni to exacerbate it, and then we're... doomed.
I can’t get over the way it’s being pitched to be honest. Like someone in the Tories has been in negotiations with Cov-ID (no doubt the crack team responsible for Brexit) and it’s agreed to have a day off.

Why not go the whole hog, televise the football match between the Allies (Us) and the Germans (COV-ID) straight after the Queen has a house party instead of her usual pre-recorded 3pm speech.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yup. Bonkers to shut down places, and leave the areas where most transmission happens open.

You want to flatten it so there's a vague hope of a 'nomal' Christmas? There's an obvious answer, and we've not taken it. Of course, it' highly likely they'll relax restrictions for the day or something bonkers, so everybody can catch Covid off everyone else, then pop back to school / uni to exacerbate it, and then we're... doomed.

We are now being patronisingly told that if we're good, we might have a semi normal Christmas. No, the correct answer was staring them in the face for months and they failed to act. They also had months to plan for what would happen when schools eventually reopened and they wasted the time.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
no it just as other have pointed out can lead to large numbers of false positives or negatives

You can not do mass testing at 97%

The problem with PCR is that the more cycles you run the more likely you are to 'detect' virus even after the infection has subsided. I'm more confused as to where the false negatives are coming from
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
This jumped out of the article for me.
As of this past week, Belgium is no longer testing people without symptoms, even if they may have been exposed.
We haven't been doing test on people without symptoms for months have we? Worrying that they are highlighting that as a cause of staff shortages in many areas with those that may not be infected having to quarantine. Our testing system is struggling to cope as it is.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top