And a partridge in a pear treeRobins should let the fans choose the team next week:
It would have no goalkeeper (to avoid losing to a howler), no full backs (can't get far enough forward), no DMs (too defensive), no wing backs (none good enough at defending), but any decent striker (who score 20 goals a season and never miss sitters). Our problem is that we have no regular starter who is also a decent striker - hence our present goal drought.
So the only team that would give our fans any confidence would have:
No goalkeeper
Ideally a central row of three Mcdonalds across the edge of the box
A more advanced link man role of Vincenti and Kelly
Either Biamou or Beavon as Target Man (according to your taste)
And five Ponticellis as Strikers (three in the box and two running angles behind them)
Why can't Robins see this???
Yes, we created 2 chances in the week from 2 crosses. Today we are putting in cross after cross with the player who wins headers not on the pitch.We need a big lump of a target man proven at League Two level. I thought this in the summer and he never arrived. Micky Adams made a very telling comment today in his closing remarks on CWR in that he thinks we lack physicality in the opposition's penalty area, he said there were a lot of crosses into the box won by Colchester defenders. Beavon, McNulty and Nazon need quality in to their feet. With Doyle and Kelly in midfield this is not going to happen. Given we can't get a big man up front until January Robins needs to rethink. I would drop Kelly for Stevenson.
We didn't win a header all game. Every one was straight back at us.Their two centre backs though were absolute monsters. Must have been 6'4" plus.
But they're all the same height when they're lying on the deck, knobbled! :emoji_yum:Their two centre backs though were absolute monsters. Must have been 6'4" plus.
I thought Beacon did better than McNulty, but still, no-one is scoring past Nazon and Jones.
But we almost scored one or two. For Robins that's enough reason to stick with the same formation and tactics.6.5 hours without a goal..
<snip<
McNulty is not the player I thought he'd be.
Me too.If Jones is out next week I would bring back Stokes and leave Haynes wide left. Would also drop McNulty and play Vincenti.
Oh, go on then. l'll stick you in the hole just behind the strikers.Me too.
He had Ponticelli stripped waiting to come on from about 85th minute mark and still didn't bring him on. Bonkers.Having listened to Mark Robins after the game , I think he's just being stubborn.
( ie, doesn't want to give into the fans regarding Ponticelli or the formation )
And this is what I can't get my head round, when they had a man sent off, they also made a substitution ,
Taking off a striker and bring on a midfielder, now that told me they were just going to defend and see out the game .
So what was Robins response , NOTHING and he only made two substitutions.
What is the point of having two holding midfielders when they are just sitting back and defending .
He, Robins also gave the impression by substituting McNulty it would effect his confidence ( you've got to laugh )
Well what about Ponticelli's confidence , he's gone from playing and scoring goals in the under 18/23 every week
to just sitting on the bench and can't even get 10 minutes today !
So if and when Ponticelli is given a game he won't be match fit .
Some football ball managers hey , still what do us fans know !!!
Yes and reflected by every other clubs crowds being proportionate aswell at the time.Pretending that they were much better in the top flight mind, frequently 10k or less early to mid 80s when he played
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
No at the deathWas that first half?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
No at the death
Maube we are talking sbout different stuff
Most of results went our way
A week for robins to work on attack. Beat luton away and momentum is well and truly back
Thay said.....ill take the draw
Well we'll never know that will we unless Robins gives him at least 45 minutes!PONTICELLI IS NOT THE ANSWER TO OUR PROBLEMS
<snip>
PONTICELLI IS NOT THE ANSWER TO OUR PROBLEMS
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It was only pointless because Mcuseless and Beavon are shit. Several low crosses went right through the 6 yard box with no one connecting. One even went through Beavon's legs.We didn't win a header all game. Every one was straight back at us.
Putting in cross after cross was pointless, stick biamou and ponti on after 60 and we would have been much better. Even on their red card.
They are if the question is who can't hit a cow's arse with a banjo.Maybe not. But it's pretty obvious that McNulty and Biamou are also not the answer.
all signings are never bang on - nobody gets 100% right
Defensively we are spot on, we just cant score
Nazon is not permanent/ Beavon is a loanee
leaves Mcnulty and Biamou
Mcnulty is a total flop - and that is Robins biggest mistake
Biamou - I still think will come good, He is getting and missing lots of chances, but i think he is a player if he scores one will go on a streak
Robins says that players read these things and get upset
Well Mcnulty if you are reading this, lose at least a stone of the timber you are carrying and you may have a chance
Their two centre backs though were absolute monsters. Must have been 6'4" plus.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?