I would happily play there , but just can't see it happening
Logistically it would be a nightmare , is there room ?
Tony
I think your reading to much into this, take CA out of the equation.
By the time we get to the pram they will all be dead and a new council of Birmingham will be in place........20000 is more than enough for any division up to the championship
if by any miracle we did get to the premier league with that level of income and parachute payment protection - we could reconsider then (and if that happened the council would be jizzing in their pants to get back into bed with ccfc)
The rest is accurate though?
Or just std business practiceSold on the condition crfc have no involvement with ccfc?
I have agreed to keep the terms of the deal confidential. Sounds like on the request of crfc?
Or just std business practice
The ground isn't big enough and has the right access. We all know that but worrying nothing would be in place for end of next season.
Can't help but think this article is click bait and then the usual raise fans hopes then piss on their chips later in the day. Blaming sisu again for having no funds or money to develop.
Yeah, usually because you don't want others finding out stuff. I'm a cynic.
It would seem so.Yeah, usually because you don't want others finding out stuff. I'm a cynic.
I'm notConfidential terms is the same as an undisclosed transfer fee is it not? There both business transactions. They would both involve contracts and an asset/s. Now if were suspicious of undisclosed transfer fees, why are we not suspicious of confidential terms?
Unfortunately we have seen recently what clauses can be inserted in any sale.
Would have been far more hopeful if there was s quite from Nr Sharpe saying yes now we can start doing business with CCFC
I disagree about the concept. I would much much rather be in a 15k, with expansion ability later in time, and have 10-12k each week so the place feels full, an atmosphere is generated and games become more fun. Nothing worse than a half empty stadium, or 3/4 empty at the moment.Wow
Still love the location of the Butts but hate the concept of a 15k stadium.
Especially at that location? it will not be enough.
I know people will say but we only get 8k now.
However the Butts is a far superior location to the Ricoh.
If it is true that the club will be financially better, if it can build its own stadium. Then you have to believe there is a possibility of some success again.
Very quickly demand will outstrip supply which will mean ticket prices shooting up.
But I must say what a location.
Unfortunately we have seen recently what clauses can be inserted in any sale.
Would have been far more hopeful if there was s quite from Nr Sharpe saying yes now we can start doing business with CCFC
So. Millerchip sells the lease to CRFC with CA resigning a few days before. Hypothetical conversation follows.
CA: Good news, we've just been informed that CRFC are going to take control of the lease so we can press ahead with our joint development plans.
SISU: Oh, er, this is awkward. Thing is we don't actually have any money for that it was all a bluff.
CA: What?
SISU: Yeah, a bluff.
Penny dropping
CA: You'll have my resignation in the morning.
Like I said. Hypothetical
The deal only happened last night didn't it?
Imagine the fun and games if he comes out and says that straight away....
I said months ago, if the ground was turned 90 degrees, and the main stand built back to the main road, a 25k ground would easily be converted.
Sold on the condition crfc have no involvement with ccfc?
I have agreed to keep the terms of the deal confidential. Sounds like on the request of crfc?
Why is it s none story?Actually this none story came from the CT read into it (SISU / CCFC had nothing to do with it) and it is the usual misleading headlines that fool a few of their readership. Shit stirring or just desperate to find something to fill their comedy paper ?
Why is it s none story?
I guess not good or a catch?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?