1-1 I think. Can't see them not scoring, not so sure about us if we play like we did on Saturday.
Burge
Haynes
McDonald
Willis
Grimmer
Reid
Doyle
Bayliss
Baker
McNulty
JCH
Would be my preference, think he will stick with Kelly though.
If everyone was fully fit, I’d say this is the best team to field against the teams we typically struggle against.
However, Kelly and Doyle start against Luton (and Notts County) because this is the kind of game they thrive in. With those two in the middle, we seem to stifle even the best attacking teams in this division. For example, both Luton and Wycombe were free-scoring before they played us and we went and 0’d them. The key to winning this game is to not concede - because in a free scoring game, we just won’t come off as winners.
My thoughts going into Barnet and Luton at home was that we’d probably draw at Barnet and beat Luton. Whilst I’d take 4pts off these two games, Luton look a bit vulnerable atm, so I fancy us for the win.
I’m going to go for 2-0, a late goal to secure the win in what was a tense affair.
Yeah, but when we are hardly scoring at all, or only scoring 1 a game, the opposition don't then need many to go in do they.
That's fair, but we create so little going forward I don't see where the goals come from. Which I think is more down to the set-up than a lack of quality.
There are 2 trialists playing.I dont think he needs it for U23, we can usually play trialists.
Can't be anywhere near ready then. You would have thought we would have thrown him straight in, even if it were for just20 mins from the bench.
Well yep, maybe LSR will surprise us all and we'll see Super Bakes on the bench tomorrow.Unless he is down as one of the trialists for today (which would be weird as we've signed him already so why not just mention his name), I would say he would have his clearance by now and will be in the squad for tomorrow.
He was ready for the u23s about two weeks ago if I remember so if he isn't being used today it must be because he's in for tomorrow. Unless he hasn't had his clearance and therefore has to play today as a trialist.
If he isn't even ready for the u23s then that would be pretty bad in my opinion, but also not believable otherwise why would we sign him?
That gave me a headache writing it.
That either means his international clearance isn't through yet, or he's on the bench TuesdayBaker isn't in the U23 it doesnt seem.
Have we only played them the twice though in all that time?Surely we can't lose to a team who haven't beaten us away since 1987, and prior to that 1930
As Nick already said, you don't need international clearance for U23 games.That either means his international clearance isn't through yet, or he's on the bench Tuesday
Sent from my 5010X using Tapatalk
So hopefully he'll be on the bench tomorrowAs Nick already said, you don't need international clearance for U23 games.
Yep. Interesting on Vincenti, because not in the squad Saturday and not in the U23's today. Same with Beavon. We also only ever seem to have one DKE not injured at a time.Is Vincenti injured again or just not favoured?
Right midfield has been a real problem this season. Thought Vincenti would have made that position his own with his experience at a higher level. DeKE hasn’t looked up to it nor have the two loanees.
With Baker not match fit and the others not favoured by the manager, it will most likely be Bayliss wide right again which is a problem as he isn’t a winger.
Which is a boost, but then part of me worries about a lack of match fitness and sharpness and that could backfire on us. Would be very easy for him to tweak something.
My guess is it will be bench if he's in the reckoning. Give him 15-20 mins in the second half.
I think Baker will be on the bench in place of Devon Kelly-Evans
Not a bad shout actually!
On the mark.I'd stick with the much maligned Doyle and Kelly for this one as I think we need to keep it tight for as long as possible and hopefully nick one. On that basis Stokes is a must aswell.
On the mark.
All we know about Robbins tells that he in a vital game he will not play anything other than Doyle / Kelly, not least because Luton are such free scorers. Bayliss in the centre too risky. For the same reason I would go with Stokes / Reid on left rather than Haynes / Reid favoured by most above.
The point is that there is no perfect answer to the midfield four conundrum, given the players available. It is just that B/D/K/R ticks more boxes than any other combination, particularly against Luton.. This game is a case of staying in there and then nicking one - see Mansfield, Wycombe Barnet
Without having kicked a ball competitively for months? Also, I didn't think they'd cleared the paperwork (not McNulty, Otis) yet?
...but that is exactly what happened.Staying in there and nicking one at home to the bottom club? Agree with other points.
Only there for the bench though.Without having kicked a ball competitively for months? Also, I didn't think they'd cleared the paperwork (not McNulty, Otis) yet?
...but that is exactly what happened.
I'm not at all sure that hopefully nicking one is the way to go. Sounds incredibly negative.I'd stick with the much maligned Doyle and Kelly for this one as I think we need to keep it tight for as long as possible and hopefully nick one. On that basis Stokes is a must aswell.
"Nicking one" relies on the other team not doing much in front of goal, if we play at the back like we did on Saturday then Luton won't miss as many as Barnet did.
But wasn't it 'devestating' because we had the pace of Jodi Jones?I think a few people are fixating on the use of the term ‘nicking one’. We’re going to set up the team to be solid and not concede and then hit Luton on the counter-attack. It’s a strategy that worked to devastating effect at their place, and generally against the ‘better’ sides in this division, with the exception of Accrington Stanley.
It isn’t really a must win game as a draw sees us overtake Lincoln and go 7th. Whilst I think we’ll win 2-0, I think a 1-1 draw is a possibility too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?