His contribution has been immense as regards to the style of play and system . His goals aren’t there yet but he’s far from poor
I just don't agree I'm afraid.
I'll accept he can do more off the ball than Godden in regards to holding it up, but I wouldn't go much further than that. Godden has been poor in recent times up until today (as much as I really like him), but that's really the only reason Simms is playing. Neither of them, in my view, are doing enough to warrant a starting position.
Like I said, Simms has shown some signs of improvement which is good, but not to the levels of say Wright and Sakamoto. If it wasn't for their contribution there would be a lot more focus on Simms, who I think gets a bit of an easier ride because of that, and the previous focus on Wright's transfer fee. I also don't buy the argument that 'he's occupying defenders so the others can thrive'. That to me seems a bit of a lazy statement and is the classic go to in order to defend a player who isn't really doing very well.
Simms is only young and needs plenty of time to develop, but using terminology like immense to describe him for me is completely the opposite of how I see it at the moment, and what I would expect from a player we have just signed for several million. If we want to hit the top I think we need some reinforcments in striker and central midfield, should there not be some further improvements in the not so distant future.