Do you want to discuss boring politics? (10 Viewers)
- Thread starter mrtrench
- Start date
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
John Major, Norman Fowler,, Geoffrey Howe... dare I say it, Keir Starmer?
Boring enough?
Boring enough?
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Im in!
Philosoraptor
Well-Known Member
Politics isn't boring. It's show business for ugly people.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Ha, ha. Love it!!!
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Was expecting this to be about the exploration of minerals and the environmental impacts associated with that.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Instead, it's about the animals and the vegetables.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Kicking off in the Premier league tomorrow night too.
Houchens Head
Fairly well known member from Malvern
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
Yep....its right up there as one of the most toxic destructive manipulative companies to have existed....ever.
Anyone who reads that and doesn't delete their account today needs to give their head a wobble.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Wobble away, to channel the 2010 GE debates “I agree with Nick”, Facebook is a medium, it reflects its user base which is basically everyone. I could write a similar article about literally any communications method ever invented. Printing press: used to make propaganda easier. Telephone: drug deals and dirty phone calls. Letters: blackmail and anthrax attacks. Mobiles: the 2011 riots and bullying. Email: spam and scams galore. Smoke signals: probably organised a massacre at some point.
Shutting down worldwide communication isn’t the answer to us not liking how people talk to each other.
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
The printing press is not the daily mail. The telephone is not BT. You're confusing online communication with facebook.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
And you’re confusing an edited and published medium with a communications method. There is no one at Facebook making editorial decisions.
Social media can not be effectively moderated in the way you want, it’s all or nothing. Frankly I don’t want corporations deciding what counts as valid ideas even if it were possible.
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
But facebook is much more than "social media".
Its effectively a publisher...something many lawyers have argued for a good long while...and something they've admitted themselves.
Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes.
Lets face it, if grubby multi-nationals like Coca cola & Starbucks are currently boycotting it.....its surely about as poisonous as it gets
Its effectively a publisher...something many lawyers have argued for a good long while...and something they've admitted themselves.
Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes.
Lets face it, if grubby multi-nationals like Coca cola & Starbucks are currently boycotting it.....its surely about as poisonous as it gets
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Stuff they put up themselves yes.
But the actual social media aspect of letting everyone mouth off is impossible to police. If they do it's censorship. If they don't it's allowing people to spread lies. You can't check that much content and relies on self-regulation, which any look through history will tell you never happens. There will always be some who will exploit it which will inevitably spread to others to counteract it and why we've ended up in this situation.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
The “problem” with Facebook is the problem with the Internet. You can’t give everyone on the planet a printing press then hope to control what they’ve printed. Even if you went full on Diane Abbott wet dreams of insisting on a verifiable ID for all users the tech community would circumvent it in seconds.
Take down Facebook and Twitter and return to the disparate collection of privately run message boards like this one where we can’t even easily see who is doing what without massive effort.
As a society we face a choice: take the internet for what it is good and bad and act with curiosity towards behaviours it surfaces that we don’t like, or we try and stuff the genie back in the bottle and lose the Internet.
The problems the net surfaces are reflections of the problems in society, there’s no evidence they create them.
Take down Facebook and Twitter and return to the disparate collection of privately run message boards like this one where we can’t even easily see who is doing what without massive effort.
As a society we face a choice: take the internet for what it is good and bad and act with curiosity towards behaviours it surfaces that we don’t like, or we try and stuff the genie back in the bottle and lose the Internet.
The problems the net surfaces are reflections of the problems in society, there’s no evidence they create them.
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Indeed.People making stuff up to further their own cause is as old as history itself. Goes back way before the written word. Stuff like racism/sexism/homophobia weren't created with the internet - it just gave a lot of people a much easier route to spread their opinions to a far wider audience than before.
This was on the media this morning and pretty much discounted .
Guess it will be coming from somewhere or someone.
www.thesun.co.uk
Guess it will be coming from somewhere or someone.
Rishi Sunak orders review of capital gains tax in bid to save UK economy
RISHI Sunak has ordered a review of capital gains tax as the Treasury looks for ways to plug the £300bn coronavirus black hole in the nation’s finances. Mr Sunak has commissioned the Office o…
www.thesun.co.uk
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
A popular backbencher removed from the Tory party. Hopefully the backbenchers show some balls.
Ian1779
Well-Known Member
I didn’t realise that this may pave the way for the release of the Russia report - that’s gonna
piss Boris off...
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
It is indeed. Doesn't reflect well on Johnson. Attempt to coerce Lewis into toeing the line?