Did this used to happen pre-NHS? Going through all the paperwork my Dad left in the loft I've discovered that when he was younger he was treated in a hospital not just paid for but belonging to his workplace, Courtaulds.I'm increasingly thinking having employers have to provide healthcare for their employees would be something to seriously look at.
No, it wouldn’t. Just another thing to hold over an employee’s head.I'm increasingly thinking having employers have to provide healthcare for their employees would be something to seriously look at.
No, it wouldn’t. Just another thing to hold over an employee’s head.
I suppose employers would expect staff to turn up for work and so on.How?
One of the potential issues with such a tax that makes the health service reliant on the state of the economy (assuming it would be paid as a % of income at source)
I suppose so but some are 'protected'True, but that’s true for all public services under the current economic model
I get there are potential problems, as employers would be less inclined to employ/retain an employee with chronic/severe health issues. But if we want to get the burden down then who else pays it.No, it wouldn’t. Just another thing to hold over an employee’s head.
I assume you mean employers, but I didn't say it would be a choice.Most employees would reject it due to cost
My usually reliable local service has been the opposite over the last few months. I mean a pay deal and recruiting sufficient drivers to cover the timetable without making some do overtime is what they should be doing.Could be good news for those who use the trains
Making some do overtimeMy usually reliable local service has been the opposite over the last few months. I mean a pay deal and recruiting sufficient drivers to cover the timetable without making some do overtime is what they should be doing.
CommunistsCould be good news for those who use the trains
I assume you mean employers, but I didn't say it would be a choice.
A similar argument was used when compulsory inclusion to pension schemes was introduced. And with that the employers gets nothing in return. Paying for healthcare you get a healthier, more productive workforce.
Correct, I had an operation on a company health scheme years back.and then found out I had to pay back about £450No I mean employees as it’s a taxable benefit
Not if the law says it isn't...No I mean employees as it’s a taxable benefit
Covering the cost of healthcare shouldn’t be an employer’s remit.Not if the law says it isn't...
It could be considered a right, just like a break during long working hours.
Not if the law says it isn't...
It could be considered a right, just like a break during long working hours.
Covering part of the cost of their retirement is with pension contributions. Why? Doesn't benefit the company is any way shape or form. Only thing is does is protect employees later in life who, some would argue, if they were sensible should be able to set aside enough for their own retirement without the need for an employer to contribute.Covering the cost of healthcare shouldn’t be an employer’s remit.
Obviously it would be rolled out among large employers, certainly to begin with anyway.Oh so you think the law should be changed and every employee have access to private health care. Barrista has cancer in an independent coffee shop - owner pays
If you want those benefits of productivity and reduced absence, we’d be better off pushing for 4 day work weeks.Covering part of the cost of their retirement is with pension contributions. Why? Doesn't benefit the company is any way shape or form. Only thing is does is protect employees later in life who, some would argue, if they were sensible should be able to set aside enough for their own retirement without the need for an employer to contribute.
As I've said there are benefits to be had to companies in term of less sick days and better productivity. Plenty of jobs involve some form of hazard that could require long term healthcare. Even some jobs that you wouldn't think of. People in archives etc. inhaling mould etc off old paperwork that over time can really damage the pulmonary system.
As it should free up the burden on the NHS it could be allied to tax cuts elsewhere to reflect that change.
Let’s make it 3!If you want those benefits of productivity and reduced absence, we’d be better off pushing for 4 day work weeks.
Hmmm, you do understand numerous 4 day work week trials have been carried out?Let’s make it 3!
I've been working a 4 day week since 2009Hmmm, you do understand numerous 4 day work week trials have been carried out?
While we’re here, how about universal school breakfast and lunch as an inexpensive help to child poverty, general nutrition, and education.
It would have a lot of secondary benefits and remove any social stigma for FSM kids. Surprised me how little it would cost compared to what I thought.Everyone should be able to drop kids at school at 8 at primary would make so many peoples mornings more manageable and it doesn’t need to be staffed by teachers.
It would have a lot of secondary benefits and remove any social stigma for FSM kids. Surprised me how little it would cost compared to what I thought.
Could make a difference to lots of people.
I’m not sure how I would have fitted the number of hours I worked into 4 days.Hmmm, you do understand numerous 4 day work week trials have been carried out?
The studies into it tend to support that productivity increases and absenteeism decreases.I’m not sure how I would have fitted the number of hours I worked into 4 days.
If you want those benefits of productivity and reduced absence, we’d be better off pushing for 4 day work weeks.
I agree, but knowing someone who runs a HAF programme they say so much food is wasted as so many kids refuse to eat it and just chuck it away. And it's not bad food either.While we’re here, how about universal school breakfast and lunch as an inexpensive help to child poverty, general nutrition, and education.
Then work smarterI’m not sure how I would have fitted the number of hours I worked into 4 days.
Well, that’s a holiday programme in fairness. I don’t think you’d get the same waste during a regular school day.I agree, but knowing someone who runs a HAF programme they say so much food is wasted as so many kids refuse to eat it and just chuck it away. And it's not bad food either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?