Do you want to discuss boring politics? (43 Viewers)

PVA

Well-Known Member
What? Even by your standards this is bizarre.

It's an Internet meme. I wouldn't expect someone who posted this gif earlier to understand.


Football Yes GIF by KreativCopy
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It's an Internet meme. I wouldn't expect someone who posted this gif earlier to understand.

Not really I thought it was rather pathetic to be honest. Though given your posting history it doesn’t surprise me.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Things Grendel wants to see on SBT


90ed97.jpg

I don’t want to see racism or memes about rape or jokes about child sex abuse - something that seems something you are very comfortable with
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
I haven't joked about child sex abuse, unless you have as well because you used the same joke back to someone. So fuck off with that.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
So why is there a shortage of drivers, and why don’t companies train trainloads so there is some competition for jobs?
Same reason we have ROSCOs rather than buying our own rolling stock, same reason there's fuck all development by the TOCs - remember who paid for the station at the stadium. They won't pay for anything that cuts into their profit.

So they demand fully qualified and experienced drivers.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I haven't joked about child sex abuse, unless you have as well because you used the same joke back to someone. So fuck off with that.

I didn’t
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Same reason we have ROSCOs rather than buying our own rolling stock, same reason there's fuck all development by the TOCs - remember who paid for the station at the stadium. They won't pay for anything that cuts into their profit.

So they demand fully qualified and experienced drivers.
Oh well, wil be nationalised in due course and everything will be hunkdory.

I guess the problem is that in the meantime there is no incentive for the operators to invest in anything.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
If is doing some exceptionally heavy lifting there
Anyone buying a modern car can see the amount if semi automation that is now in built. Adaptive cruise control, lane keeping, self drive through junctions and roundabouts, collision prevention, pedestrian avoidance etc etc.

I really should have said that, compared with automation of road traffic, the railway should be a piece of piss.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Oh well, wil be nationalised in due course and everything will be hunkdory.

I guess the problem is that in the meantime there is no incentive for the operators to invest in anything.

Yeah I’m sure they were juuuust about to. No worries we’ve still got the great efficient private sector water suppliers.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Yeah I’m sure they were juuuust about to. No worries we’ve still got the great efficient private sector water suppliers.
I do actually share your cynicism re: railway investment, but the nationalisation agenda must be the final nail in that particular coffin.

Water should never have been privatised. It does piss me off how they have paid significant dividends to investors and then plead poverty when it comes to cleaning up their act.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Reeves was lying about the inherited economic position being the worst since 1945:-

Why solid growth complicates the Budget masterplan​

Chancellor Rachel Reeves in a navy blue suit sitting down looking at a speech written on paper
IMAGE SOURCE, GETTY IMAGES
Faisal Islam
Economics editor

    • Published
      4 hours ago
The latest data on the UK economy revealed it grew solidly between April and June, as it did in the previous three months. The figures clearly show a turning point in the spring as the UK continued its recovery from the brief recession at the end of 2023.
The 0.7% growth in the first quarter and the 0.6% that followed are not a boom. But it is a welcome return to more normal growth, after three years of crisis. And at the same time, inflation figures have returned to more normal levels.
In 2024 so far, the UK has grown the fastest of all the G7 advanced economies, even more than the US.
While the picture is different over longer timeframes or if population growth is factored in, it raises reasonable questions about the “grim economic inheritance” claimed by the new government from its predecessor.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Reeves was lying about the inherited economic position being the worst since 1945:-

Why solid growth complicates the Budget masterplan​

Chancellor Rachel Reeves in a navy blue suit sitting down looking at a speech written on paper
IMAGE SOURCE, GETTY IMAGES
Faisal Islam
Economics editor

    • Published
      4 hours ago
The latest data on the UK economy revealed it grew solidly between April and June, as it did in the previous three months. The figures clearly show a turning point in the spring as the UK continued its recovery from the brief recession at the end of 2023.
The 0.7% growth in the first quarter and the 0.6% that followed are not a boom. But it is a welcome return to more normal growth, after three years of crisis. And at the same time, inflation figures have returned to more normal levels.
In 2024 so far, the UK has grown the fastest of all the G7 advanced economies, even more than the US.
While the picture is different over longer timeframes or if population growth is factored in, it raises reasonable questions about the “grim economic inheritance” claimed by the new government from its predecessor.
Begs the question doesn't it,why did he go for it, I'd wager it was to prevent the nutters from taking over, trouble is a new type nutter.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Labour: our spending plans rely on growth

Press: Ha! unlikely!

Economy: *grows*

Press: More bad news for Labour.
Labour can’t take credit for the growth to date in 2024.

Some sections of the press do not believe that the economy will grow under Labour: it is of course far to early to tell.

The point here is that Reeves lied about the state of the economy she had inherited to justify actions which weren’t in the manifesto and which Labour politicians had argued against before the election.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Labour can’t take credit for the growth to date in 2024.

Some sections of the press do not believe that the economy will grow under Labour: it is of course far to early to tell.

The point here is that Reeves lied about the state of the economy she had inherited to justify actions which weren’t in the manifesto and which Labour politicians had argued against before the election.

Who cares who takes credit. The economy growing is never a bad thing for the government. Total Westminster brainworm to think otherwise.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Who cares who takes credit. The economy growing is never a bad thing for the government. Total Westminster brainworm to think otherwise.
If nobody cares who takes the credit, then logically nobody should care who takes the blame if things go pear shaped. Certainly not the Labour messaging,
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Wonder what that looks like if you take immigration numbers out of it.
And that is 2023, the BBC is reporting best growth of G7 in 2024 following a brief recession in 2023,

The point is in 2023 the economy tanked. You’d hope there was growth in 2024. It’s not the sign of a strong economy. It’s a dead cat bounce.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Labour: our spending plans rely on growth

Press: Ha! unlikely!

Economy: *grows*

Press: More bad news for Labour.

Or an alternative version….

Labour: our spending plans rely on growth and we shouldn’t have to raise taxes

Economy: grows strongly for two quarters and inflation back to normalish leading to BoE rate cut

Labour: we’ve inherited a big financial hole we didn’t know about so will have to cut some investment projects and reduce some benefits to pensioners

Press: but you’ve just authorised a load of above inflation public sector pay rises without any strings such as future work practice efficiencies or no strike clause in the short term

Labour: it’s all about the financial black hole baby…oh and we can’t rule out a few sneaky tax rises in October either

ps excuse some artistic licence on timings 😊
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Or an alternative version….

Labour: our spending plans rely on growth and we shouldn’t have to raise taxes

Economy: grows strongly for two quarters and inflation back to normalish leading to BoE rate cut

Labour: we’ve inherited a big financial hole we didn’t know about so will have to cut some investment projects and reduce some benefits to pensioners

Press: but you’ve just authorised a load of above inflation public sector pay rises without any strings such as future work practice efficiencies or no strike clause in the short term

Labour: it’s all about the financial black hole baby…oh and we can’t rule out a few sneaky tax rises in October either

ps excuse some artistic licence on timings 😊

In what way are the pay rises above inflation?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
As are you avoiding mine, Reeves has lied and has used the lie to justify penalising pensioners and cutting infrastructure projects.

What lie?

Look around you. What’s working? Prisons? Schools? Transport? Anything?

The Tories have avoided governing for four years. The economy having growth after tanking doesn’t change that. Don’t just repeat what you read in the papers.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
What lie?

Look around you. What’s working? Prisons? Schools? Transport? Anything?

The Tories have avoided governing for four years. The economy having growth after tanking doesn’t change that. Don’t just repeat what you read in the papers.
The lie that the economy is worse than at any time since the end of the Second World War.

If what she wants to do is give pay awards greater than current inflation with no productivity or modernisation conditions then own it and admit the consequences for taxpayers. Don’t lie that the state of the economy has come as a surprise - if anything has come as a surprise to her it is probably the strength of the economic recovery.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member

MalcSB

Well-Known Member

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The lie that the economy is worse than at any time since the end of the Second World War.

If what she wants to do is give pay awards greater than current inflation with no productivity or modernisation conditions then own it and admit the consequences for taxpayers. Don’t lie that the state of the economy has come as a surprise - if anything has come as a surprise to her it is probably the strength of the economic recovery.
You’re annoyed at what, some above inflation pay rises after 14 years of real term pay cuts?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Labour can’t take credit for the growth to date in 2024.

Some sections of the press do not believe that the economy will grow under Labour: it is of course far to early to tell.

The point here is that Reeves lied about the state of the economy she had inherited to justify actions which weren’t in the manifesto and which Labour politicians had argued against before the election.
There is some Brexit underperformance that has to be accounted for £40B a year,so a net difference of 20-30B doesn't seem to wild really?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
You’re annoyed at what, some above inflation pay rises after 14 years of real term pay cuts?
If you read what I posted, it’s the lies I’m annoyed about. Take whatever decisions you see fit, but don’t blame the worst economic performance since the Second World War for the consequences on other sectors of the economy, when it simply isn’t the truth - and was clearly the intention before the election.

TBH the train drivers offer is fucking barking and without any agreements on modernised working practices.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top