MalcSB
Well-Known Member
They won’t be able to do that forever.
They won’t be able to do that forever.Yes and manufacturers are offering huge discounted support to retailers to try and get rid of them
They won’t be able to do that forever.
Why do they need London weighting if they are not working in London?How dare the proles get a decent wage?
Why do they need London weighting if they are not working in London?
My wife’s friend has one. Constant range anxiety and huge cost and time added to journey if not charging at home. I bought a diesel.£10 grand support on a Jaguar I Pace and they still are not selling
Well no, I know why it’s impossible for me to have been a teacher or do what I do now from home. No objections there.And here we have the real reason. “How dare people have better working conditions or rewards than I have”
This country
View attachment 38747
If they are wfh they arent travelling to London so why pay the weighting allowance?Why not pay everyone minimum wage?
Travel to London isn’t free. And labour markets are labour markets. I don’t live in London, but my head office is there and my wage reflects that. WFH allowing the only people in the country to earn a halfway reasonable salary to spend their money outside London isn’t a bad thing.
Well no, I know why it’s impossible for me to have been a teacher or do what I do now from home. No objections there.
But people who do have that privilege complaining about having to go in less than half of the time seem to forget about the optics of what they’re complaining about.
People who get 13 weeks a year off with full pay and work 9-3 whining about others having an issue with fitting childcare around work seem to forget the optics of what they’re complaining about.
See how this works?
This with “better” rewards are going to get hammered in the budget. So yes, how very dare they,And here we have the real reason. “How dare people have better working conditions or rewards than I have”
This country
View attachment 38747
Perfectly reasonable compensation for having to deal with the kids of today.People who get 13 weeks a year off with full pay and work 9-3 whining about others having an issue with fitting childcare around work seem to forget the optics of what they’re complaining about.
See how this works?
As you and I both know, teaching is one of a few jobs where unpaid overtime is standard. So not the checkmate argument you think it is.People who get 13 weeks a year off with full pay and work 9-3 whining about others having an issue with fitting childcare around work seem to forget the optics of what they’re complaining about.
See how this works?
As you and I both know, teaching is one of a few jobs where unpaid overtime is standard. So not the checkmate argument you think it is.
To be clear my ultimate goal is to be in a hybrid or WFH job myself, and hybrid seems to be the optimum for a lot of jobs that aren’t impossible to do WFH.
Perfectly reasonable compensation for having to deal with the kids of today.
This with “better” rewards are going to get hammered in the budget. So yes, how very dare they,
So, in the case of the ONS civil servants their employers (one of the two grours best placed to judge) are saying they want attendance at base two whole days a week. Seems reasonable.Its almost like every job is different and the people best placed to judge it are those doing it and those employing them to do it and not jealous randoms.
Possibly but on the other hand the utterly toxic press would revert to its primary position of peddling rubbish.Would love to see a similar study done but for turning off ‘socials’ entirely. I’d like to think it would generally improve the quality of our political discourse and mend a few divides.
Come on, grow upThere are lies, damned lies and statistics.
The stats can still be worked out later
I hope those “based” in London have had their weighting allowance stopped,
If they're obliged to travel into the office they should be paid London weighing, it's as simple as that.Why do they need London weighting if they are not working in London?
As you and I both know, teaching is one of a few jobs where unpaid overtime is standard. So not the checkmate argument you think it is.
To be clear my ultimate goal is to be in a hybrid or WFH job myself, and hybrid seems to be the optimum for a lot of jobs that aren’t impossible to do WFH.
They are taking industrial action to continue not travelling in to the office, ergo they are not travelling in to the office, it’s as simple as that.If they're obliged to travel into the office they should be paid London weighing, it's as simple as that.
As in unpaid or you just didn't do it......NQT's still work a lot of unpaid hours, they are not management.Every management role I’ve done was without overtime
My wife’s friend has one. Constant range anxiety and huge cost and time added to journey if not charging at home. I bought a diesel.
I WFH for around 3.5 years but recently started renting an office. WFH isn’t all it’s cracked up to be, I’d say hybrid is probably the way to go.As you and I both know, teaching is one of a few jobs where unpaid overtime is standard. So not the checkmate argument you think it is.
To be clear my ultimate goal is to be in a hybrid or WFH job myself, and hybrid seems to be the optimum for a lot of jobs that aren’t impossible to do WFH.
I’d imagine unpaid, it tends to be expected as standard.As in unpaid or you just didn't do it......NQT's still work a lot of unpaid hours, they are not management.
I'd say it should be the same everywhere.Why do they need London weighting if they are not working in London?
Just drop London weighting completely then.I'd say it should be the same everywhere.
Encourage people to move to places that have lower living costs because they're in need of redevelopment by saying you get exactly the same as someone living in expensive London. Buy a dingy one bed flat or a nice three-bed semi with a garden for the same money?
They keep on saying how run down and full of social problems all these towns and cities are then do fuck all about it and just try and get more well-paid jobs to the SE.
Well I was thinking it will cause a housing bubble everywhere eventually, but I think I subscribe to shhmmeee doctrine of giving everyone a rise, but am prepared to hear arguments against that because it seems every time that happens it just gets eaten away by price's inflating and so it goes!!Just drop London weighting completely then.
What’s worse, selling access - or “breach” of Trade Descriptions Acts as the business secretary wasn't going to attend. Supposedly.Its a new day and I thought the last lot were bad.
Ed Miliband has urged his party to stop selling access to senior government ministers, after it emerged Labour had offered company bosses breakfast with the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, for up to £30,000.
‘Don’t do it again’: Miliband condemns £30,000 Labour breakfast with minister
Party offered company bosses event with business secretary, but Ed Miliband says Jonathan Reynolds knew nothing of itwww.theguardian.com
No road tax though, probably a saving £2-k per annumEd Milliband is pretty thick - his carbon capture 22bn project was undone by a Scientist in less than 30 seconds this morning - he also thinks during the winter everyone will do their shopping in a pushbike -twat !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?