fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
What is the government doing about it? You said they were reparing public services?
What do you think councillors are doing exactly? Cackling with glee that people with learning disabilities are losing funding.
No. The Tories avoided most of these issues. That’s why they’re still there.
That's probably true on 50p Pete, but she is doing a massive U-turn on what she actually said to camera. "...we will compensate them for the money they've lost".Says Lee Anderson who has had more parties than most of us have had in our lifetimes lol
Even if I don’t disagree with you, surely at some stage you have to concede that an overarching message of “You’re too dumb to understand we’re helping you” isn’t going to make it easier to pull the levers of government.The hysteria is ludicrous. People need to get a grip. All Labour have done so far is take decisions any government will have had to. The complete lack of understanding those whining have shown is astounding quite frankly.
Even if I don’t disagree with you, surely at some stage you have to concede that an overarching message of “You’re too dumb to understand we’re helping you” isn’t going to make it easier to pull the levers of government.
Even if I don’t disagree with you, surely at some stage you have to concede that an overarching message of “You’re too dumb to understand we’re helping you” isn’t going to make it easier to pull the levers of government.
Oh yeah of courseThat's probably true on 50p Pete, but she is doing a massive U-turn on what she actually said to camera. "...we will compensate them for the money they've lost".
Oh yeah of course
However it’s £10bn
If it was socialist labour having a go I’d say ok as it’s Anderson and reform who don’t give a shit about social justice and equity they can stick it to their arse
Oh yeah of course
However it’s £10bn
If it was socialist labour having a go I’d say ok as it’s Anderson and reform who don’t give a shit about social justice and equity they can stick it to their arse
It’s not my positionWhat a ridiculous position. You either believe politicians should be true to their word or you don't.
Oh yeah of course
However it’s £10bn
If it was socialist labour having a go I’d say ok as it’s Anderson and reform who don’t give a shit about social justice and equity they can stick it to their arse
Socialism isn't selectively deciding on benefits according to a perception of somebody's existing wealthSocialism is some people getting compensation when their benefits change because they’re well connected but not others who aren’t.
Socialism is some people getting compensation when their benefits change because they’re well connected but not others who aren’t.
Socialism is some people getting compensation when their benefits change because they’re well connected but not others who aren’t.
He's a Male?
Fuck me, is this a variation of the "Gregg" defence. It's only middle class women of a certain age that are complaining?
It seems like your definition of people who will suffer under WFA cuts, or who have suffered under WASPI is strictly limited to what Starmer tells you and based on opinion rather than inconvenient facts.
So this goes back to the era of John Major with a Nurse from Hampshire who wanted to work on rather than retire leading to all women having to work 5 yrs more, now 6 and soon to be 7 , somebody's getting it if it's not going to these people unless someone can do the sums on working age population v retirees.
Figure out, how did it start,the contributions would have existed from the inception of it so where did they find money from and what has diminished it so , I'm going to have a guess, remember serps, earnings related?
0.5 reduction then in 80 yrs 12.5 % or an increase in pensioners ,guess it's the latter with all the health benefits around, just paid the blood scandal victims,soon liable for post office.4.1 workers to a pensioner in 1960, 3.6 now.
0.5 reduction then in 80 yrs 12.5 % or an increase in pensioners ,guess it's the latter with all the health benefits around, just paid the blood scandal victims,soon liable for post office.
A bad time to get elected really!
He's good mates with Trump from the Epstein days at leastGood to see Starmer has the political acumen of a Twix in appointing a nonce facilitator to his ambassador squad.
Labour veteran Peter Mandelson says US ambassador job an 'honour'
Staggered? It's probably the least surprising political story of the year. There was never going to be a scenario where the public were won over by Starmer's charisma or political instincts. God knows who they're lining up as successor. Reeves, Cooper or Streeting
Staggered? It's probably the least surprising political story of the year. There was never going to be a scenario where the public were won over by Starmer's charisma or political instincts. God knows who they're lining up as successor. Reeves, Cooper or Streeting
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?