I'm not a Labour supporter.
But tell me exactly what it is that makes Starmer, Rayner, Dodds, Reeves, Nandy, Burnham and Abbott so much worse and unelectable compared to Johnson, Rees-Mogg, Raab, Hancock, Patel, Dorries, Truss, Fletcher and Rosindell?
That's the weirdest argument.
"We can't vote for these people to be in government because they're not already in it. The other lot may have fucked up everything since they've been in, but they're already in power and that's what really matters!"
I doubt it'll be Johnson there by that time. Brexit also seems to be stuck in some kind of rut now, where some people will refuse to blame anything on it. And let's face it, if last election Dennis Skinner could be voted out because of Brexit, anything's fair game - if ever there was an MP who was more leave than the current PM, that was one. He'd have gladly voted for us to leave given the chance!
Best they can hope for next election, probably, is slashing the majority and having them and Lib Dems in position to claim seats to tip the balance the election after that - is a depressing thought, but it's too big a majority to turn around in one go, barring a catastrophe.
I'm not a Labour supporter.
But tell me exactly what it is that makes Starmer, Rayner, Dodds, Reeves, Nandy, Burnham and Abbott so much worse and unelectable compared to Johnson, Rees-Mogg, Raab, Hancock, Patel, Dorries, Truss, Fletcher and Rosindell?
No it’s because a lot of people are not living in the Dickensian poverty you portray but are just living a life they are comfortable with
Labour offers nothing to these people
But many people are living in poverty and the Tories don't give a fuck (nor do you).
No it’s because a lot of people are not living in the Dickensian poverty you portray but are just living a life they are comfortable with
Labour offers nothing to these people
Even if Labour offers nothing, it's still more than the Tories, who seem intent to take as much away from them as possible to protect the assets of those that have a lot more. And I'm sure if they felt they could get away with taking more and removing welfare etc. they'd do it in a heartbeat because they'd believe it'd just promote those idle people to be more self-reliant or some other such bollocks. For some of them a return to Dickensian Britain when Britain led the world on the exploitation of the lower classes is a wet dream. At least then the pesky proles knew their place!
Looks like Liz Truss’ supporters are jockeying her into position to challenge to be the next leader of the conservatives.
Of course it would be ridiculous, but would it be any more so than what we currently have?You have to laugh or else you'd cry.
Looks like Liz Truss’ supporters are jockeying her into position to challenge to be the next leader of the conservatives.
Sorry
But I would though.
Filthy.
Hancock being caught out again.
Has Jo murdered any foxes recently from his £1 million converted windmill?
Deflector shields set to maximum Captain…Has Jo murdered any foxes recently from his £1 million converted windmill?
this is a far bigger story.
Deflector shields set to maximum Captain…
It really isn’t. Maugham and Gina Miller are as bitter as fuck about Brexit - it’s only a bigger story if the wider population give a fuck and when it’s from a narcissist like Maugham they will not and don’t
It really isn’t. Maugham and Gina Miller are as bitter as fuck about Brexit - it’s only a bigger story if the wider population give a fuck and when it’s from a narcissist like Maugham they will not and don’t
Maughams opinion on brexit is irrelevant, he's exposed a minister with his hand in the till misappropriating taxpayers money, I thought youd be furious?
As for killing a fox, I wonder if he found it to be a sexual experience like our PM?
So this is a criminal matter - is a prosecution pending?
Fingers crossed.
no then - just more sabre rattling from a bitter man in a kimono
“Mr Johnson said he “loved” hunting with dogs, in part because of the “semi-sexual relation with the horse”Maughams opinion on brexit is irrelevant, he's exposed a minister with his hand in the till misappropriating taxpayers money, I thought youd be furious?
As for killing a fox, I wonder if he found it to be a sexual experience like our PM?
I'm surprised at your flippant attitude to the misuse of public money.
And Blairs never appeared in the Hague but I think we both agree he's still a war criminal.
Of course he hasn’t - he’s a muppet. But that was not the point as you well know.I don’t need to deflect as no one in planet real world cares Ian - out of interest has Sir Keir told Angela about the reshuffle yet?
We moan a lot about MP’s but there are some absolute fuckwits running things at local, parish and county level.
Also a climate change denier. Interesting chap.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?