shmmeee
Well-Known Member
He’s like 99% of MPs and votes with the whip of his party. Do you think he’s suddenly going to 180 the Labour policy platform from the back benches?
You are a silver spoon boy who doesn't care because the type of things he votes for have never been a concern for you
He joined the Tory party for reasons which I suspect is his political outlook being closely aligned with the Tory whip. He's hardly in the Tory heartlands here is he?He’s like 99% of MPs and votes with the whip of his party. Do you think he’s suddenly going to 180 the Labour policy platform from the back benches?
He’s like 99% of MPs and votes with the whip of his party. Do you think he’s suddenly going to 180 the Labour policy platform from the back benches?
Yeah this.
He's clearly a bit of a tosser but he's not the first and won't be the last tosser to join Labour.
He'll obviously follow the whip. Much rather he be following the whip for Labour than on the other side.
He joined the Tory party for reasons which I suspect is his political outlook being closely aligned with the Tory whip. He's hardly in the Tory heartlands here is he?
He's defected as he thinks it is expedient for his long term political career. It's a terrible terrible look for Labour to welcome such an individual.
Members of the public in Bury South on the 10 o'clock news fuming with one asking "what's the point in voting?"....
....Good question!
No, I'm not a 'Corbynista'Good one. You seem absolutely desperate for the Labour Party to fail. Are you a Corbynista?
Good one. You seem absolutely desperate for the Labour Party to fail. Are you a Corbynista?
Didn't you vote for Corbyn?
No, I'm not a 'Corbynista'
Didn't you vote for Corbyn?
Im Sure he said in the past he doesn’t vote labour
He joined the Tory party for reasons which I suspect is his political outlook being closely aligned with the Tory whip. He's hardly in the Tory heartlands here is he?
He's defected as he thinks it is expedient for his long term political career. It's a terrible terrible look for Labour to welcome such an individual.
If anything it’s given Johnson a stay of execution
Starmer clearly doesn’t care about whose in his party or what they stand for
Are labour voters in a constituency going to vote for a Tory - hilarious stuff
Completely agree with this, increasingly looks like this has, at least for now, saved Johnson.If anything it’s given Johnson a stay of execution
Starmer clearly doesn’t care about whose in his party or what they stand for
Are labour voters in a constituency going to vote for a Tory - hilarious stuff
So you don’t think there should be a by-election? Because people vote for MPs not parties.
Well Wakeford himself sponsored a bill proposing that a recall petition should be automatically triggered if a MP changed political affiliation.So you don’t think there should be a by-election? Because people vote for MPs not parties.
Well Wakeford himself sponsored a bill proposing that a recall petition should be automatically triggered if a MP changed political affiliation.
Starmer is ruthless and will drop/switch his position in a heartbeat if he thinks it will benefit him. Take his position on nationalisation of energy - in his leadership run he was all for it… now he’s on LBC saying he doesn’t agree, when it has broadly cross-political support from voters, and also in the middle of a energy crisis for a lot of people.Yes but not because I wanted Corbyn as Prime Minister, but because I didn't want Boris johnson as Prime Minister.
It was a choice between having your arm chopped off or getting kicked in the teeth. I went for the less shit of the two options.
Though I liked some of his policies I certainly am no Corbyn fan, I can't stand the guy. Starmer is a million times better.
Well Wakeford himself sponsored a bill proposing that a recall petition should be automatically triggered if a MP changed political affiliation.
And with open selection I doubt they would chose such a charlatan to represent them.Bring it on then, Labour will walk Bury South in any election now
Starmer is ruthless and will drop/switch his position in a heartbeat if he thinks it will benefit him. Take his position on nationalisation of energy - in his leadership run he was all for it… now he’s on LBC saying he doesn’t agree, when it has broadly cross-political support from voters, and also in the middle of a energy crisis for a lot of people.
He has no vision, plan or ideas to move the country forward.
He’s obsessed with power IMO.
Starmer is ruthless and will drop/switch his position in a heartbeat if he thinks it will benefit him. Take his position on nationalisation of energy - in his leadership run he was all for it… now he’s on LBC saying he doesn’t agree, when it has broadly cross-political support from voters, and also in the middle of a energy crisis for a lot of people.
He has no vision, plan or ideas to move the country forward.
He’s obsessed with power IMO.
Abs with open selection I doubt they would chose such a charlatan to represent them.
He won’t be in power unless he gets into bed with Sturgeon anyway.And you can't do anything if you are not in power.
I'd rather we won elections than became a 6th form debating society
He won’t be in power unless he gets into bed with Sturgeon anyway.
He is incapable of being Prime Minister
I'd rather elections were won by somebody that was planning on fixing the structural inequalities in British society that stop people lumping for Boris Johnson and Brexit as their only options.And you can't do anything if you are not in power.
I'd rather we won elections than became a 6th form debating society
With the planned boundary changes on top I very much disagree.That is just nonsense and you know it
In theory you're supposed to vote for an MP, not a party.
That's not what actually happens though for the majority of people of course
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?