Do you want to discuss boring politics? (156 Viewers)

clint van damme

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member


Only Djangoly and Bacon were in the commons tonight for the vote on the windfall tax.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
It is was any other job, you would be suspended pending investigation. This MP will be asked not to come to parliament.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Isn't a sentence of 12 months more more they need? after all appeals?

No but I mean isn't the mechanism for them to go to be appointed an officer of some archaic realm? Or to be removed by petition of constituents-but the other disciplinary processes aren't as they are for a normal workplace
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No but I mean isn't the mechanism for them to go to be appointed an officer of some archaic realm? Or to be removed by petition of constituents-but the other disciplinary processes aren't as they are for a normal workplace

Surely any job you couldn’t fire someone without being found guilty in a court of law?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
That’s why suspension doesn’t often happen these days
For an allegation like this, suspension on full pay would happen nearly every time. It certainly would where I've worked.

The list of offences is considerable in this case. Sexual assault, rape, abuse of power. Its also a job that would need to pass police checks, security clearance, and has contact with the public.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
That’s why suspension doesn’t often happen these days

I thought it was the other way round, and people were suspended as standard for allegations such as bullying or sexual harassment?
I thought leaving someone working alongside their accuser left the company vulnerable to a claim if the allegations were proven true?
Don't know a lot about it so I could be wrong.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I thought it was the other way round, and people were suspended as standard for allegations such as bullying or sexual harassment?
I thought leaving someone working alongside their accuser left the company vulnerable to a claim if the allegations were proven true?
Don't know a lot about it so I could be wrong.
Innocent till proven guilty and suspension suggests guilt
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Innocent till proven guilty and suspension suggests guilt

Standard practice. Know of a colleague who was accused of sexual misconduct with a student-they were taken off site immediately. Investigation concluded the allegation was entirely false and they were allowed back. But...if it had been true then they presented an immediate risk to those around them
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Standard practice. Know of a colleague who was accused of sexual misconduct with a student-they were taken off site immediately. Investigation concluded the allegation was entirely false and they were allowed back. But...if it had been true then they presented an immediate risk to those around them
Teaching different I would think
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
The amount of people naming Francois on Twitter and yet now lots are saying it's Rosindell. I doubt they'll apologise if wrong either way, but labelling someone a rapist on baseless opinion is pretty low whatever side of the divide you're on. In these cases they should either name or say nothing. Saying a man in his 50s from the police is what motivates the poundshop detectives.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top