In no particular order
A flat VAT cut to 15% or lower
Commitment to a maximum classroom cap of 25
Legalisation of cannabis
A raise in the minimum wage to £10/h
Renationalisation of rail and utilities
If even vaguely possible, scrap HS2 and instead use the proceeds to improve road, rail and public transport across the 4 nations
Raising corporation tax back to pre 2010 levels
I could go on but happy to expand on the rationale for any of them.
Would it not be spineless to let your shadow cabinet colleagues strike when you explicitly ban them from doing so?
I’ve not got a problem with backbenchers playing activist politics, but the cabinet/shadow cabinet are supposed to be a credible government or government in waiting.
A cabinet is bound by collective responsibility and if you disagree with a policy, you resign or get sacked.
Imagine how bad it would have been if Boris hadn’t have gotten the big calls rightPeople dying in corridors but hey Keith said something about strikes so I couldn't possibly vote Labour even if doing so might improve the NHS.
So you’d cut VAT by 5% and balance that with increased borrowing and massive public expenditure commitments. You’d have to raise taxes as the corporation tax increases would not cover for this. The market conditions at the minute makes borrowing money more expensive which pushes spending up even further.
I’m no economist, but printing money and increasing minimum wage would likely exacerbate inflation further. Which would have wiped out the benefit of increasing the minimum wage. There’s also the unforeseen consequence of pushing companies to accelerate automation.
In summary, well meaning policies but would likely be a disaster.
It's a decent point that needs to be consideredI agree that an international tax for multi nationals should be based around revenues generated in each country but for most normal businesses taxing revenue wouldn’t work. You’d end up with loads of businesses, especially in early stages, paying tax when they are loss making or barely making a profit. Id imagine this would stifle growth.
For example, under the 5% example a small business turning over 500k and breaking even would still pay 25k tax which could’ve paid for a new member of staff, materials or a new machine etc
I'd say that's a big part of the problem.The single currency meant its dominance was compounded
Tax on business raises Very little in the grand scheme at all. You really need to look at the big costs in public services future it and work how to address it
trying to out tory each otherHopefully that's just a case of appealing to the headbangers and not something he'd actually implement.
So you’d cut VAT by 5% and balance that with increased borrowing and massive public expenditure commitments. You’d have to raise taxes as the corporation tax increases would not cover for this. The market conditions at the minute makes borrowing money more expensive which pushes spending up even further.
I’m no economist, but printing money and increasing minimum wage would likely exacerbate inflation further. Which would have wiped out the benefit of increasing the minimum wage. There’s also the unforeseen consequence of pushing companies to accelerate automation.
In summary, well meaning policies but would likely be a disaster.
So you’d cut VAT by 5% and balance that with increased borrowing and massive public expenditure commitments. You’d have to raise taxes as the corporation tax increases would not cover for this. The market conditions at the minute makes borrowing money more expensive which pushes spending up even further.
I’m no economist, but printing money and increasing minimum wage would likely exacerbate inflation further. Which would have wiped out the benefit of increasing the minimum wage. There’s also the unforeseen consequence of pushing companies to accelerate automation.
In summary, well meaning policies but would likely be a disaster.
Ben Wallace backs Liz Truss. There's someone who waits to see who's going to win before jumping.
Alternatively he can see she's going to win so is sucking up for a decent job alongside Dorries and Rees Mogg.I heard that earlier and thought/heard this would happen. That’s probably Sunak done unless something crazy happens (put that gun away NW !)
On a positive note Id like to think that as he’s worked closely with Truss maybe she’s not as shit as I thought ?!…. Grasping !!!
Alternatively he can see she's going to win so is sucking up for a decent job alongside Dorries and Rees Mogg.
First time I think she's looked almost human!Fucking hell. When you make Nadine Dorries look like the sane one you know you need help.
First time I think she's looked almost human!
Fucking hell. When you make Nadine Dorries look like the sane one you know you need help.
I answered your question.
So why criticise Biden but never Trump?
Good try, my rightwardly drifting friend, but as I’ve already said that would not be my entire manifesto and there are of course plenty of other ways to raise money and cut costs.
I think Labour tried to cost the renationalisation of utilities and the railways and there were holes in it.
I voted for that program in 2019 but have since come to the conclusion that public ownership a) probably wouldn’t achieve its goals in delivering better customer experience and prices and b) would likely be a drain on the public purse.
The Soviet Union’s economy was ran by the government: the state owned industry, it planned all output and it set all the prices for every product. Ultimately, that experiment failed because the economy did not have the dynamism to compete with markets.
Marx famously said ‘history happens once as tragedy, second as farce’.
I think Labour tried to cost the renationalisation of utilities and the railways and there were holes in it.
I voted for that program in 2019 but have since come to the conclusion that public ownership a) probably wouldn’t achieve its goals in delivering better customer experience and prices and b) would likely be a drain on the public purse.
The Soviet Union’s economy was ran by the government: the state owned industry, it planned all output and it set all the prices for every product. Ultimately, that experiment failed because the economy did not have the dynamism to compete with markets.
Marx famously said ‘history happens once as tragedy, second as farce’.
Going straight from nationalised energy to communist Russia is one hell of a leap.
The reason an industry is nationalised is because it’s either in the national interest to ensure minimum standards/coverage (police, health, education) or if it’s a natural monopoly (utilities,roads, rail). Transport and energy drive the economy, and no real competitive market exists, so by definition all privatisation does is funnel off funds to shareholders and marketing. That’s a price worth paying for innovation in less critical industries, but not when failure has such impacts on the rest of society.
With regard to the railways, franchises have consistently failed. The East Coast mainline had its best spell in recent times when it came back under government control.
Renationalising utilities wouldn't be easy as the French are finding out with EDF, however, they now plan to go ahead with bringing the last 16 percent into public ownership because they've realised this isn't all about the bottom line, its about energy security and being in charge of your own supplies.
As for your comments on the Soviet Union, what's that got to do with anything?
No ones talking about nationalising manufacturing or services.
I think Labour tried to cost the renationalisation of utilities and the railways and there were holes in it.
I voted for that program in 2019 but have since come to the conclusion that public ownership a) probably wouldn’t achieve its goals in delivering better customer experience and prices and b) would likely be a drain on the public purse.
The Soviet Union’s economy was ran by the government: the state owned industry, it planned all output and it set all the prices for every product. Ultimately, that experiment failed because the economy did not have the dynamism to compete with markets.
Marx famously said ‘history happens once as tragedy, second as farce’.
but, but I was told he doesn't support workers rights'Labour must go from protest into power - then hand power to working people'
Writing exclusively for the Sunday Mirror, Labour Leader Keir Starmer says he supports the right to strike - and that his support went beyond "sentiment and a photo opp - I backed up my words with action"www.mirror.co.uk
No, there's someone who's been promised a lucrative job and career enhancement in exchange for an endorsement.Ben Wallace backs Liz Truss. There's someone who waits to see who's going to win before jumping.
but, but I was told he doesn't support workers rights
What does he actually say there?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?