Do you want to discuss boring politics? (222 Viewers)

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Such a powderpuff interview too - the alleged ‘journalist’ didn’t challenge one ounce of her bullshit. Might as well have been a party political broadcast.
She isn’t going to face a journalist who’s going to challenge her.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The devil is obviously in the detail but from what she’s said in interviews she seems completely economically illiterate. She’s been banging on about our debt to GDP ratio desperately trying to justify borrowing by saying we’re not as bad as other G7 countries. Which as a comment in isolation is true but it doesn’t mean we’re doing great. It’s currently at about 81% but we’ve had slow/stagnated growth for a decade, are heading into a recession which is projected to be deeper and longer than comparable countries which is going to increase that number without the extra debt she’s talking about. The country is spiralling and she’s on cloud cuckoo land.

Wanting to reduce the tax take is fine if you can prove that you will recoup at least as much back from ‘growth’. It did blow a huge gangrenous hole in the American budget when Trump and Bush did it but sure we can try the same failed idea again here
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
The devil is obviously in the detail but from what she’s said in interviews she seems completely economically illiterate. She’s been banging on about our debt to GDP ratio desperately trying to justify borrowing by saying we’re not as bad as other G7 countries. Which as a comment in isolation is true but it doesn’t mean we’re doing great. It’s currently at about 81% but we’ve had slow/stagnated growth for a decade, are heading into a recession which is projected to be deeper and longer than comparable countries which is going to increase that number without the extra debt she’s talking about. The country is spiralling and she’s on cloud cuckoo land.
I've said before she sounds like someone who's just attended their first A level economics lesson and trying to show off what she's learnt.
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
Wanting to reduce the tax take is fine if you can prove that you will recoup at least as much back from ‘growth’.
The trouble with that is you can't 'grow' an economy when international trade is shrinking, you just suck in imports which leads to a trade deficit, run on the Pound, etc. That has been the downfall of many a previous UK Prime Minister.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Also different doing some firefighting to having an actual strategic plan

Im surprised she’s had the courage to unmask on public transport given she once said unmasked Tory MPs were risking her and other labour MPs lives

 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Let me introduce you to the concept they call “time”.
Let me introduce you to the concept they call “time”.

I think this was around “the time” - have to say I admire her bravery her forcing herself against all her instincts to attend an award night

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Well it isn't really is it? It's still a franchised service that happens to be run by a company owned by the DFT as the private company running it handed it back. It is not a nationalised railway in the true sense of the term.

I just feel crap like this and Corbyns fake “no seats” thing harm their case TBH.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I'm all for a free market economy. If these firms have not given any thought to future sustainability, then why should they receive hand outs from the state.

Should they not just be sold privately for anyone who wants to take the debt on with the spirit of capitalism at the forefront of this thinking, or taken into public ownership at whatever fire sale price the administrator could get from the Government?

After a while, the businesses would become a viable again, and then be sold by the government at a profit or kept on being run by the Govt at a profit.

Absolutely fuck the shareholders.

 
Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I'm all for a free market economy. If these firms have not given any thought to future sustainability, then why should they receive hand outs from the state.

Should they not just be sold privately for anyone who wants to take the debt on with the sprit of capitalism at the forefront of this thinking, or taken into public ownership at whatever fire sale price the administrator could get from the Government?

After a while, the businesses would become a viable again, and then be sold by the government at a profit or kept on being run by the Govt at a profit.

Absolutely fuck the shareholders.


That’s what the Germans are doing I think nationalising failed energy companies.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I'm all for a free market economy. If these firms have not given any thought to future sustainability, then why should they receive hand outs from the state.

Should they not just be sold privately for anyone who wants to take the debt on with the sprit of capitalism at the forefront of this thinking, or taken into public ownership at whatever fire sale price the administrator could get from the Government?

After a while, the businesses would become a viable again, and then be sold by the government at a profit or kept on being run by the Govt at a profit.

Absolutely fuck the shareholders.


Mass business collapse would be a much worse outcome, you can see the vulture capitalists circling
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Kwarteng seemingly off his tits at the funeral.

Can you imagine the general outrage and backlash if a Labour MP was seen doing this?


I believe it’s known as postural sway

F3B0EB78-4045-4925-B75D-60388A3F8AAB.gif

In reality it’s all a game to them so he’s probably on the phone to his mum asking her if she can see him on telly yet and then getting all excited when she said yes.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I could see small business support being needed, but if you are taking huge profits each year, then why would you as a business need socialism again to prop to you up when things go bad?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I could see small business support being needed, but if you are taking huge profits each year, then why would you as a business need socialism again to prop to you up when things go bad?
Because they get to keep all the profits and someone else foots the bill when it goes to shit. It's brilliant for them.

The last thing they actually want is for everyone to actually install capitalism properly. Because if they did they'd be fucked as no-one would bail them out.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top