Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Starmer is pathetic.
Starmer is pathetic.Their battle is my battle as far as I'm concerned
Anyway
The candidate representing the party he leads will be getting my vote.Starmer is pathetic.
The candidate representing the party he leads will be getting my vote.
What else can I do whilst the tories are in power?
The debate about Starmer and the direction of the Labour party needs to begin when he's in No. 10. Not before.
That ship has sailed.
It's almost as if he wants to win an election.
And of course at no point does he say we won't repeal the laws.
Here's some other headlines about the same story:
Labour vows to make it easier for unions to strike as walk outs already set to cripple UK
Labour promises to battle anti-strike legislation “every step of the way”
Labour's Rachel Reeves says party will OPPOSE Rishi Sunak's attempts to bring in tough new anti-strike laws
But of course if they don't say exactly what the left need to hear then they're as bad as the Tories and we may as well just carry on letting them fuck the country over, in fact it probably be even worse under Keith
'The left'?
Well certain elements of the left. Not allowed to say the C word though or I'll be called obsessed
Have a day off you utter simpleton, the only people mentioning the C word every other post are clowns like youWell certain elements of the left. Not allowed to say the C word though or I'll be called obsessed
Don’t worry your doing a great job as the de facto spokesman of the Centrist Dads.Well certain elements of the left. Not allowed to say the C word though or I'll be called obsessed
bingoQED.
Like clockwork. Even got a 'centrist dad'!
Hilarious.QED.
Like clockwork. Even got a 'centrist dad'!
He's busy knocking one out over Supertanskii at the minuteDon’t worry your doing a great job as the de facto spokesman of the Centrist Dads.
The candidate representing the party he leads will be getting my vote.
What else can I do whilst the tories are in power?
The debate about Starmer and the direction of the Labour party needs to begin when he's in No. 10. Not before.
That ship has sailed.
The amount of traps Starmer would walk into if he did what some folk on here wanted him to do
Exactly this. You’ll have far more sway over and Labour govt than any Tory. Still some people want a badge they can wear to show their principles rather than the ability to change lives.
In 13 years, Blair and Brown repealed not one anti union law that they inherited from Thatcher and Major. Since 2010, there was fresh legislation further curbing our rights which came in in 2016, and more is on the way before the next election.It's almost as if he wants to win an election.
And of course at no point does he say we won't repeal the laws.
Here's some other headlines about the same story:
Labour vows to make it easier for unions to strike as walk outs already set to cripple UK
Labour promises to battle anti-strike legislation “every step of the way”
Labour's Rachel Reeves says party will OPPOSE Rishi Sunak's attempts to bring in tough new anti-strike laws
But of course if they don't say exactly what the left need to hear then they're as bad as the Tories and we may as well just carry on letting them fuck the country over, in fact it probably be even worse under Keith
Who else are we going to vote for?In 13 years, Blair and Brown repealed not one anti union law that they inherited from Thatcher and Major. Since 2010, there was fresh legislation further curbing our rights which came in in 2016, and more is on the way before the next election.
If neither Blair nor Brown could be bothered, and ignored pressure from their own ‘side’ to do so, what reason is there to think that Starmer will overhaul an even bigger set of anti union laws, with a smaller majority? These laws don’t just cover strikes, which are important, they also cover collective bargaining rights for workers, how leadership ballots have to be conducted etc. Allowing these to remain in place is inexcusable.
But as usual we get the line that they are employing genius level tactics to avoid the ‘trap’ of supporting working people in place of those who already hold all the cards. He leads the Labour Party-time to act like it.
In 13 years, Blair and Brown repealed not one anti union law that they inherited from Thatcher and Major. Since 2010, there was fresh legislation further curbing our rights which came in in 2016, and more is on the way before the next election.
If neither Blair nor Brown could be bothered, and ignored pressure from their own ‘side’ to do so, what reason is there to think that Starmer will overhaul an even bigger set of anti union laws, with a smaller majority? These laws don’t just cover strikes, which are important, they also cover collective bargaining rights for workers, how leadership ballots have to be conducted etc. Allowing these to remain in place is inexcusable.
But as usual we get the line that they are employing genius level tactics to avoid the ‘trap’ of supporting working people in place of those who already hold all the cards. He leads the Labour Party-time to act like it.
Anyway, a Labour government is coming....Who else are we going to vote for?
Sigh. I’ve already said I’ll pinch my nose and vote Labour because we just have to be rid of the current lot.Who else are we going to vote for?
I guess the point is we all decrease things to a certain extent - none of us will instantly end up at zero, there'll always be anomolies, but everybody can decrease to a certain extent.Anybody else coming to the realisation that going 'green' is a complete waste of time and money, a lifetime/fortune spent on solar panels and insulation is completely blown out of the water by a few hours private jet journey by the mega rich.
Oxford council going full totalitarian regarding the use of vehicles and leaving their 'zones' is shining some light on their(the elites) intentions for us. (Almost cracking out the tin foil here).
Anybody else coming to the realisation that going 'green' is a complete waste of time and money, a lifetime/fortune spent on solar panels and insulation is completely blown out of the water by a few hours private jet journey by the mega rich.
Oxford council going full totalitarian regarding the use of vehicles and leaving their 'zones' is shining some light on their(the elites) intentions for us. (Almost cracking out the tin foil here).
I guess the point is we all decrease things to a certain extent - none of us will instantly end up at zero, there'll always be anomolies, but everybody can decrease to a certain extent.
Oxford is... interesting innit. They seem to even be banning electric cars after all in their zones. At least they're holding off implementing it until Mrs Wisdom's parking permit expires!
I think I'm becoming disillusioned by the whole green agenda, I understand why and the reasons for it, just seem futile for the mass populous to struggle while the few are burning my lifetimes usage of energy going for lunch.
I think insulation and solar is good solely for reducing your dependency on buying energy, I'm not really that bothered about the green credentials of itAnybody else coming to the realisation that going 'green' is a complete waste of time and money, a lifetime/fortune spent on solar panels and insulation is completely blown out of the water by a few hours private jet journey by the mega rich.
Oxford council going full totalitarian regarding the use of vehicles and leaving their 'zones' is shining some light on their(the elites) intentions for us. (Almost cracking out the tin foil here).
That is an understatement. This is a Government that resolutely refuses to learn from the mistakes of the past.Another really bad idea
UK banking rules in biggest shake-up in more than 30 years
Rules introduced after the financial crisis in 2008 that were aimed at limiting risks will be eased.www.bbc.co.uk
I don’t think it’s a waste of time but you’re right to raise private aircraft. I was reading something a while ago that suggested that all the private aircraft in the world create more carbon than all commercial aircraft every year. Granted a lot of that is going to be pleasure flying in two seater aircraft and personally I don’t take issue with that as most of them are owned in consortiums so it’s not one individual responsible for that. I do think however there should be a worldwide green tax on private aircraft landing based on duration of flight, efficiency of the aircraft and the number of passengers on board. If you’re the lone person on a private jet that’s just crossed the Atlantic when you could have flown first class on numerous aircraft you should pay handsomely for that privilege.Anybody else coming to the realisation that going 'green' is a complete waste of time and money, a lifetime/fortune spent on solar panels and insulation is completely blown out of the water by a few hours private jet journey by the mega rich.
Oxford council going full totalitarian regarding the use of vehicles and leaving their 'zones' is shining some light on their(the elites) intentions for us. (Almost cracking out the tin foil here).
They know they’re out at the next election so they’re making hay while the sun shines for their buddies regardless of the damage it can do. They’ve got the plebs to pick up the cost of that. Same as last time.Another really bad idea
UK banking rules in biggest shake-up in more than 30 years
Rules introduced after the financial crisis in 2008 that were aimed at limiting risks will be eased.www.bbc.co.uk
They know they’re out at the next election so they’re making hay while the sun shines for their buddies regardless of the damage it can do. They’ve got the plebs to pick up the cost of that. Same as last time.
Absolutely. They expect to be out by the time it all goes wrong. As with Bexit it's great if you are very rich but disastrous for most people. But getting rid of red tape always appeals to the uninformed. They just don't understand what they are losing.They know they’re out at the next election so they’re making hay while the sun shines for their buddies regardless of the damage it can do. They’ve got the plebs to pick up the cost of that. Same as last time.
Absolutely. They expect to be out by the time it all goes wrong. As with Bexit it's great if you are very rich but disastrous for most people. But getting rid of red tape always appeals to the uninformed. They just don't understand what they are losing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?