Do you want to discuss boring politics? (240 Viewers)

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
He’s not - he’s saying his history of lies is similar to that of Johnson to achieve power

He’s not even referring i don’t think to his interesting behaviour when in charge of the CPS

Correct.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

He obviously came to prominence when he decided to use Gary McKinnon to toady with the US State Offices by throwing him under a bus despite overwhelming evidence he was likely to commit suicide.

When May then decided to tell him he’s been overruled he got straight on a plane the next day to beg them that it won’t damage their future relationship
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PVA

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
The 'first to mention corbyn when debating starmer' stakes were won by outsider TomRad 85 after a disappointing showing from odds on favourite Shmmeee
Oh and you can just call me Tom now. I think we're there.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I think the one interesting thing about the so called right wing press is they haven’t really done very much on Starmer when they could easily do so

The disappearing pledges
The claim to stand by them on the picket line
Standing with workers campaigning for a minimum wage of £15 per hour
Promising to retain the 2017 manifesto as the cornerstone of future politics for labour governments
This is without the accusations levelled at him when at the CPS

I wonder why that might be
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
I think the one interesting thing about the so called right wing press is they haven’t really done very much on Starmer when they could easily do so

The disappearing pledges
The claim to stand by them on the picket line
Standing with workers campaigning for a minimum wage of £15 per hour
Promising to retain the 2017 manifesto as the cornerstone of future politics for labour governments
This is without the accusations levelled at him when at the CPS

I wonder why that might be

Ah yes the press take it so easy on Labour and are just so bloody unfairly hard on the squeaky clean tories :cry:

They tried their best to go after Starmer and the best they could come up with is that he had a curry

'I wonder why that might be'
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Ah yes the press take it so easy on Labour and are just so bloody unfairly hard on the squeaky clean tories :cry:

They tried their best to go after Starmer and the best they could come up with is that he had a curry

'I wonder why that might be'

That’s exactly the point I’m making

Lol you can’t make that up
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PVA

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
I think the one interesting thing about the so called right wing press is they haven’t really done very much on Starmer when they could easily do so

The disappearing pledges
The claim to stand by them on the picket line
Standing with workers campaigning for a minimum wage of £15 per hour
Promising to retain the 2017 manifesto as the cornerstone of future politics for labour governments
This is without the accusations levelled at him when at the CPS

I wonder why that might be
They are obviously confident he’s not going to rock the establishment boat.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
They are obviously confident he’s not going to rock the establishment boat.

Well that’s for certain. Rachel reeves is definitely colour blind. The poor girl thinks the Rosette she wears is blue. Shouldn’t someone tell her?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I only look at this thread occasionally but you've ruffled some feathers this morning. Love to see it.
Also getting all defensive over a politician is weird, the Starmer lads are starting to sound a bit like the Corbyn cultists, ironically.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
tbf it's the comparison. I'd even find that slightly mental if directed at Truss!
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
The UK is naturally a conservative (with a small c) country, IMO…so to get elected it’s the kind of leader Labour have to have.
Spot on.

But as we can see from this thread the Labour leaders who hardly have a chance of getting voted in are championed and their faults ignored whereas someone who has a serious chance of winning an election has many having a go at them.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
tbf it's the comparison. I'd even find that slightly mental if directed at Truss!

An accusation of dishonesty aimed at Truss would be very misguided.
She had such unwavering belief in her policies she held nothing back, one economic melt down later and she's still banging the same drum and playing the poor me card.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Spot on.

But as we can see from this thread the Labour leaders who hardly have a chance of getting voted in are championed and their faults ignored whereas someone who has a serious chance of winning an election has many having a go at them.
Or maybe asking the question of what they are going to do with the opportunity?
Do something transformative for the country or just be a glorified Cameron spiv?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Or maybe asking the question of what they are going to do with the opportunity?
Do something transformative for the country or just be a glorified Cameron spiv?
Did you or anyone else questioning the integrity of Starmer ask that of Corbyn?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Or maybe asking the question of what they are going to do with the opportunity?
Do something transformative for the country or just be a glorified Cameron spiv?
tbf, the first term isn't necessarily the one to be making massive changes... just stop the rot. Even Thatcher was relatively docile in her first term (kept state aid there for BL for a start!) - it was really her second term that she took as a mandate to go radical.

And that's the missed opportunity with Blair - not the first term, which was a massive imrpovement of what had gone before in terms of outlook and attitude, and general funding ideals... but the second term, where he didn't take the opportunity to reverse some of the worst righty legislation and introduce a social democratic framework more deeply into society.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The UK is naturally a conservative (with a small c) country, IMO…so to get elected it’s the kind of leader Labour have to have.

At this election it’s likely labour would be elected anyway so I guess having a bland Tory lite spiv is a tad annoying
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Or maybe asking the question of what they are going to do with the opportunity?
Do something transformative for the country or just be a glorified Cameron spiv?

We have a cost of living crisis.
We're the only G7 country whose economy has not returned to prepandemic level.
We have health, education and transport systems in crisis.
Inequality is going through the roof.
There's been an assault on people's freedoms and their right to protest and withdraw their Labour.
Brexit still hasn't reaped the rewards we were told it would.

I'm not sure moving at gnats whisker leftwards is going to sort this.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Lying???? Changing opinion and reacting to situations isn’t it?
Why do you care?

Why has he reneged on a commitment to nationalise railways?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Of course but it shows the mettle of a person?
Johnson’s history is one well known as a compulsive liar

his history there isn’t exactly without concerns is it?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Probably can’t afford it or sell it?
honest answer I don’t know it’s not lying though unless you have it in for someone

“I pledge a minimum wage of £15”
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Why has he reneged on a commitment to nationalise railways?
Could do it the Tory way and waste billions on things that don't enrich people's lives or wait for the contracts to run down and do something different.

So is it better to change plans depending on the financial mess the Tories have left us with or plough ahead wasting untold billions like the Tories do?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top