And how many of those are currently in the boroughs that already have the ULEZ and where the ULEZ is popular?700,000 vehicles in London are - amazing how thick you think voters are
And how many of those are currently in the boroughs that already have the ULEZ and where the ULEZ is popular?
For those who don't eat crayon, the Tory campaign painted the ULEZ as a tax on everyone when the majority of people won't actually be hit by it.
4 out 5 Vehicles in outer London are meet ULEZ standards? These are the London Governments own figures. If you have a problem with the figures I suggest you take it up with them:The majority of them will still not be impacted until it rolls out as car ownership is far higher in these zones
Again those who will be hit are traditional labour voters - something you seem very reluctant to acknowledge
So instead of it being a issue the hits everyone, it will effect 1 in 5 people and yes there should more done to help them but it is not a issue that will effect the majority of people unlike what the tory campaign said. Poor air quality and bad health because of it is in fact something that will effect everyone.
Most of those happy will be Tory voters anyway - it’s the poorer people who will be disadvantaged
4 out 5 Vehicles in outer London are meet ULEZ standards? These are the London Governments own figures. If you have a problem with the figures I suggest you take it up with them:
The Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) for London
The ULEZ was expanded across all London boroughs on 29 August 2023.www.london.gov.uk
So instead of it being a issue the hits everyone, it will effect 1 in 5 people and yes there should more done to help them but it is not a issue that will effect the majority of people unlike what the tory campaign said. Poor air quality and bad health because of it is in fact something that will effect everyone.
It's more a case of allowing a policy the party supports to to be painted as a charge that will cost everyone thousands a year when it is nothing of the sortSo why the hand wringing over it? Nothing to do with having literally nothing else to offer
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Seen that too and if true you’re right, that is a massive failure on labour’s part.Is it true that ULEZ was brought in by a Conservative mayor and the expansion to place was like Uxbridge was a condition put in place by the Conservative government before they would give funding to TfL?
That's something going round on twitter but surely can't be right. if it was true that would be a stunning failure on Labours part if they've ended up carrying the blame in the local election campaign
Little fannyImagine having this little fanny as your MP, it'd be like having PVA or something
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Is it true that ULEZ was brought in by a Conservative mayor and the expansion to place was like Uxbridge was a condition put in place by the Conservative government before they would give funding to TfL?
That's something going round on twitter but surely can't be right. if it was true that would be a stunning failure on Labours part if they've ended up carrying the blame in the local election campaign
In practice, I agree. The sentiment is correct but there needs to be far more controlled measures to help with lowering the cost of EVs, etc. Additional R&D tax advantages to look at ways to lower the cost?
It’s not like there’s no incentive to lower battery costs, it’s just a function of time really. Same as renewables were once upon a time. We just don’t have the luxury of waiting, so we gotta throw money at it. We wouldn’t have had to if people like Grendel hadn’t spent the last thirty year whining about minor and cheap changes we could have made that have everyone enough time to transition fairly.
Dont know what I’ve got to do with anything. I do know how the industry works - which you clearly don’t - you literally haven’t a clue
Do you even drive an electric car?
Found this article from October 2021 quoting the documentIs it true that ULEZ was brought in by a Conservative mayor and the expansion to place was like Uxbridge was a condition put in place by the Conservative government before they would give funding to TfL?
That's something going round on twitter but surely can't be right. if it was true that would be a stunning failure on Labours part if they've ended up carrying the blame in the local election campaign
No, what you're doing wrong is policies from the Tory party end up coming out of the Labour leader's mouth.20 points ahead yet terrified of their own shadow.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Sometimes.
Contrarians like yourself have been doing this tiresome shite with every climate action proposal forever. So instead of a bunch of slow and cheap changes we have a load of quick expensive ones. And now you’re whining about that too because you’re fundamentally a ridiculous person.
How the car industry works is irrelevant, the change needs to be made. The excuses have run out.
Yay my team are the winnersComes with free 100 seat majority!
Yay my team are the winners
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Yay my team are the winners
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Sums him up
Your desperation to be best buddies with FP is so cringe
Somewhat ironic
*policies not included
To give it some context Sunak is on a -40 approval rating. His lowest ever following a recent drop of 6%. So in the big scheme of things it is going well relatively if you measure it against his only real rival. What isn’t going well is the population’s approval of politicians. UK politics is on its arse.
It's going well
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
To give it some context Sunak is on a -40 approval rating. His lowest ever following a recent drop of 6%. So in the big scheme of things it is going well relatively if you measure it against his only real rival. What isn’t going well is the population’s approval of politicians. UK politics is on its arse.
It's going well
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Might help if he had the odd policy other than "I'm not them"He seems the most uninterested leader of an opposition party I’ve seen - it’s just all a bit odd
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?