Backs up doesn't it?
Sure they had the heads up, but I think otherwise personally?Backs up doesn't it?
A trick learned from Tony Blair. He did it to get into power in the 90's.Doesn’t Starmer also just refuse to give any decisive opinion in his interviews?
Doesn’t Starmer also just refuse to give any decisive opinion in his interviews?
Sure they had the heads up, but I think otherwise personally?
Quite possible but I’m thinking that some centre right Tory voters might be wooed back. To his credit I think Sunak understands that the culture war bollocks isn’t working, unless you want a load of gammons fighting police to disrupt proceedings at the cenotaph. Bringing in Cameron is a clear shift back towards the centre ground which with the exception of 2019 is where the Tories perform best. My gut feeling is that the Tories will claw more back than they lose. The only question is will it be in key battlegrounds. I suspect vote’s going to Reform or another far right will be enough for Labour to win in the red wall.Or a drop as people switch to RefUK
It’s an inevitable decision which will lead to ECHR being a target and the rhetoric the law is denying an ejected government to decide its own legislation
I don’t know about a heads up, but Braverman’s letter to Sunak (and her general behaviour for the past month) suggests the writing has been on the wall for some timeWonder if there was some heads up on that and that’s why Braverman went really.
Quite possible but I’m thinking that some centre right Tory voters might be wooed back. To his credit I think Sunak understands that the culture war bollocks isn’t working, unless you want a load of gammons fighting police to disrupt proceedings at the cenotaph. Bringing in Cameron is a clear shift back towards the centre ground which with the exception of 2019 is where the Tories perform best. My gut feeling is that the Tories will claw more back than they lose. The only question is will it be in key battlegrounds. I suspect vote’s going to Reform or another far right will be enough for Labour to win in the red wall.
Do you mean elected,more of it in some form then?It’s an inevitable decision which will lead to ECHR being a target and the rhetoric the law is denying an ejected government to decide its own legislation
Do you mean elected,more of it in some form then?
Maybe this will make the government look for a genuine solution rather than throwing red meat around.
The right will be absolutely frothing over this and the government will of course continue to whip it up.
It’s an inevitable decision which will lead to ECHR being a target and the rhetoric the law is denying an ejected government to decide its own legislation
You’re employing critical thinking and facts. You’re not their target audience.The court found that the Rwanda plan was in breach of domestically originated legislation
bringing cameron is as you say a clear attempt to shift back to the centre and it's pretty much they are giving up on the red wall and are trying to limit the level of defeat by looking to defend the blue wall by bringing back the more liberal tories that live there from the lib demsQuite possible but I’m thinking that some centre right Tory voters might be wooed back. To his credit I think Sunak understands that the culture war bollocks isn’t working, unless you want a load of gammons fighting police to disrupt proceedings at the cenotaph. Bringing in Cameron is a clear shift back towards the centre ground which with the exception of 2019 is where the Tories perform best. My gut feeling is that the Tories will claw more back than they lose. The only question is will it be in key battlegrounds. I suspect vote’s going to Reform or another far right will be enough for Labour to win in the red wall.
Or you ask him about strikes.Starmer has repeatedly called Hamas terrorists. That’s why there aren’t any viral videos to be had asking him that question. Instead you ask him what a woman is.
Or you ask him about strikes.
We should probably point out that the government has already spanked £140M on this folly. Maybe it would have been a good idea to sort the legality out first? Already rumours that the government is now trying to look for another country to partner up with so it looks like they plan to do the same thing expecting different results.
It's time to play the, "Let's find a country in the world that we haven't pissed off at some point in the last few centuries" game. It's a fairly short list.
Failing that we just need to find a country with a government as corrupt and incompetent as our own, and chuck their PM/President a large brown envelope. Given our current government, that's a pretty short list too.
Ukraine?It's time to play the, "Let's find a country in the world that we haven't pissed off at some point in the last few centuries" game. It's a fairly short list.
Failing that we just need to find a country with a government as corrupt and incompetent as our own, and chuck their PM/President a large brown envelope. Given our current government, that's a pretty short list too.
We should probably point out that the government has already spanked £140M on this folly. Maybe it would have been a good idea to sort the legality out first? Already rumours that the government is now trying to look for another country to partner up with so it looks like they plan to do the same thing expecting different results.
he seemed more sensible in PMQs about thisWould’ve made sense to get the legalities sorted first wouldnt it ! Absolute waste of money so far. Sure I’ve heard/read recently that we’re not the only European country looking into this type of solution…maybe everyone’s going to have to leave the ECHR
Be interested to see how Sunak proceeds and whether post braverman he dials things down a little.
You have to admire Corbyn's passion though, he actually seems to genuinely care, unlike most other politicians.Exactly. If you’ve got a topic that can elicit a viral response from a politician you push it. And while Starmer blusters and bothers, Corbyn gets angry and aggressive and more importantly the range of topics on which he does so is far wider and more controversial than Starmer’s.
I'd be angry if, while a genocide is taking place, my interviewer was speaking to me solely for a "Corbyn loves terrorists lol" gotcha. It's really a sign of the moral cesspit the media is that the c**t is still prominent.Exactly. If you’ve got a topic that can elicit a viral response from a politician you push it. And while Starmer blusters and bothers, Corbyn gets angry and aggressive and more importantly the range of topics on which he does so is far wider and more controversial than Starmer’s.
That still wouldn't have sorted the moralities of course.Would’ve made sense to get the legalities sorted first wouldnt it !
he had no clue what his next step was if that presser was anything to go onWhen will this party stop embarrassing the country?
View attachment 32418
Just trying to feather his nest for when they get turned out. The problem is this zombie government is causing harm each day it carries on and is just making their impending defeat heavier the longer it drags out.he had no clue what his next step was if that presser was anything to go on
looks beaten