Do you want to discuss boring politics? (17 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Ah you got me. I'm secretly a life long Tory voter.

Bring back are Boris!

Well

 

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
The objective of me voting is not to vote against the Tories - I am never going to vote for them so it's irrelevant to me if they are worse.

This site is interesting: UK Predictions

This the prediction for my constituency:

View attachment 33941
If by default not voting for the Tories' main opposition means the Tories get in, then effectively you may as well have voted for them however.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Well

I'm feeling very much a minority around here in having never voted Tory!

And to think people like to claim this is a lefty area...
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Well


And?

I voted Tory when I was 19 because I was a naive kid who knew nothing of the world and thought they were the good guys because that's what my dad told me.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Thing is though, Starmer's leadership election was left enough for me. I understand having to ditch a couple of things too but, honestly, what remains?

Not a lot. When running a campaign like he is saying nothing is the safest strategy. But what are you gonna do? Bring back Rebecca Wrong-Daily? Actually fucking listen to me and elect Nandy? The ship has sailed. All that moaning now does is potentially reduce Labours majority, which would make it have to be even more “right wing”
 

Northants Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The GE will be a binary decision between a party containing:

Rees-Mogg, Braverman, Truss (funded by vested interests/dark money)

or

Bryant, Cooper, Phillips (funded by trade unions/publicly declared conations)


Only one could drag the Overton window back to some semblance of normality
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
tbf, shmmeee does have a point that the current crop of insane Tories are worse than even a centre-right leaning Labour Party, so that's the point.

Also easier to influence from a position of power than on the margins, so better to start there really.

But I do agree it's frustrating. tbh Starmer's leadership campaign was about right for me - progressive, vaguely left policies dressed up in a respectable intelligent suit who'd shown he could argue well, and ditching the more wild areas of policy and rhetoric for electability. The thrall to focus groups is disappointing, as there has been an opportunity to lead the conversation that hasn't been taken. You'd think a manifesto has to say something about going forward as people do need to be inspired with a bit of hope - Johnson may be an incompetent womaniser, but he's always understood that you offer people promises of hope and things happening, and people vote for you!

Anyway, I reckon my seat will stay Tory regardless (UKIP always seemed to run strongly here too!) so I'll be voting Labour out of tokenism unless somebody really moves me from the margins - and no, it won't be Reform!

The thing is until someone on the left produces an exemplar to follow to get elected that isn’t tacking to the centre, Labour politicians who want to get elected will use the only playbook that’s worked.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Say what you like about me, I don't really care, just stop bringing my family and my upbringing into it.

Nothing more privileged than being happy to carry on decimating public services and having poverty and homelessness rise so that you don’t have to sully your principles.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Nothing more privileged than being happy to carry on decimating public services and having poverty and homelessness rise so that you don’t have to sully your principles.


Frustrated World Cup GIF
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
The thing is until someone on the left produces an exemplar to follow to get elected that isn’t tacking to the centre, Labour politicians who want to get elected will use the only playbook that’s worked.
I thought Starmer's leadership manifesto was tacking pretty centrally tbh!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Nothing more privileged than being happy to carry on decimating public services and having poverty and homelessness rise so that you don’t have to sully your principles.

How are the cast iron fiscal rules going to repair public services or address poverty? Please do explain. At the moment the Conservative government runs a budget deficit and always has even with services cut to the bone - Labour is promising to cut that deficit to zero in five years. It has to address revenue spending and a massive capital backlog, how is it going to do it?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
How are the cast iron fiscal rules going to repair public services or address poverty? Please do explain. At the moment the Conservative government runs a budget deficit and always has even with services cut to the bone - Labour is promising to cut that deficit to zero in five years. It has to address revenue spending and a massive capital backlog, how is it going to do it?

Charity bet that by any reasonable metric poverty and homelessness will fall and public service satisfaction will rise within three years of a Labour victory?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

The guy who posted it is now a Tory, a conflicted Tory but he doesn’t want a left wing government so sorry Posh Boy there is no life raft there
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Charity bet that by any reasonable metric poverty and homelessness will fall and public service satisfaction will rise within three years of a Labour victory?

Grendel is laughing because like FP the idea of measuring political ideology by results is scary to them. Much better to stay in the safety of internet comments where you can claim you’d have solved everything and everyone else is stupid and corrupt.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Wealth is the key there. But no one wants to tackle that.

I’d be happy as a higher rate income tax payer to pay a bit more. I can afford it and the country is in the toilet, but it’s wealth that really matters.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Grendel is laughing because like FP the idea of measuring political ideology by results is scary to them. Much better to stay in the safety of internet comments where you can claim you’d have solved everything and everyone else is stupid and corrupt.

No I’m laughing about a socialist who started a thread on a football forum to explore if there was a loophole to escape paying higher rate tax.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
No I’m laughing about a socialist who started a thread on a football forum to explore if there was a loophole to escape paying higher rate tax.

My position on tax has always been the same: it’s the governments job to collect it. The idea socialists should pay more than legally required because of their beliefs about what tax legislation should be is some of your more weird bullshit.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
My position on tax has always been the same: it’s the governments job to collect it. The idea socialists should pay more than legally required because of their beliefs about what tax legislation should be is some of your more weird bullshit.

No - it was the legally required amount and you wanted to see if loopholes were available so you didn’t pay it. Classic Tory ideology. Just own what you now are. Your beliefs are in the dustbin.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
There's only one person in here who likes to portray themselves as a posh boy.

I came from a council estate and went to a failing comp and was only one of a handful who went to Uni.

My family all voted labour - oddly at 18 I could think for myself - unlike you it seems
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
No - it was the legally required amount and you wanted to see if loopholes were available so you didn’t pay it. Classic Tory ideology. Just own what you now are. Your beliefs are in the dustbin.

I wasn’t looking to break the law Grendel. I was asking what the tax law was.

Tax evasion is a moral failing, tax avoidance is a government failing. You just think the plebs shouldn’t be allowed to use the same tax law as everyone else.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top