Do you want to discuss boring politics? (37 Viewers)

D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Great to have the public talking about whether some lockdown rules were broken though rather than how the decline in everybody's standard of living might be addressed, love it
Is that really all you think this is about? You see no problem with a Prime Minister repeatedly lying to Parliament?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Scotland doesn’t have a land border with the EU and as you know, NI are a special case due to GFA. The reason why it’s such a great deal for NI is they have access to single market without having to pay into the pot, without FOM requirement and have a break on new EU rules

I might be wrong but I presume Sunak can’t labour these points in public as it might piss off some EU members. Basically NIs position is unique and better than other EU members

If EU offered that deal to the U.K. I’d imagine we’d snap their hands off (ERG nutters/DUP aside 😊)
You’re forgetting one thing. The Boris bridge ;)
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Didn't think it was complicated to be honest
He’s got a point though - classic dead cat syndrome. Much easier to howl about the outrage of Sue Gray’s appointment and fill column inches about a ‘stitch up’ than have to respond to questions about how the country is going down the toilet.

I’ll give you another example of last weeks teacher strike - the government have realised that there is popular support for the strikes, so the media that is supportive of them simply acted like it didn’t happen.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
He’s got a point though - classic dead cat syndrome. Much easier to howl about the outrage of Sue Gray’s appointment and fill column inches about a ‘stitch up’ than have to respond to questions about how the country is going down the toilet.

I’ll give you another example of last weeks teacher strike - the government have realised that there is popular support for the strikes, so the media that is supportive of them simply acted like it didn’t happen.
It's not a question of one or the other. A Prime Minister lying to Parliament is a bit of a problem in a democracy. And that doesn't mean that the Government's abject failure to deal with the economic crisis isn't important.

Also trying to dismiss Johnson's behaviour as him just being a bit of a laugh is insulting to the people who obeyed the rules and those who lost friends and relations and couldn't say goodbye to them prperly.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Didn't think it was complicated to be honest

The appointment of Sue Gray I suppose was made for good practical reasons, yet it'll now just serve to distract from actual real current issues. We have already well established Johnson lied to parliament, so what? He's no longer the Prime Minister. What difference will talking about it now make to people who can't put food on the table?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It's not a question of one or the other. A Prime Minister lying to Parliament is a bit of a problem in a democracy. And that doesn't mean that the Government's abject failure to deal with the economic crisis isn't important.

Also trying to dismiss Johnson's behaviour as him just being a bit of a laugh is insulting to the people who obeyed the rules and those who lost friends and relations and couldn't say goodbye to them prperly.

Blair lied to parliament which led us into an illegal war.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
So that's all right then?

Well I think he still got re-elected and someone on here said we should forget all that and he is the best prime minister since Sunny Jim Callaghan
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
If ever there was a reason to stop the ex prime minister dishing out a load of honours to to his mates Stanley Johnson getting one is it.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
If ever there was a reason to stop the ex prime minister dishing out a load of honours to to his mates Stanley Johnson getting one is it.
It comes with the system
It’s set up for statesmen and women and gentlemen and ladies and unwritten decorum that we as a society have said fuck it too
We will have to demand a new way of it working if we want something different
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
He has no shame !

I’ve read both Starmer and Sunak are looking at some kind of reform of HofL.

For starters remove all non attendees (those with below X% attendance) immediately, reduce total number, limit PM ability to submit endless new peerages (maybe one in one our policy) and stop all hereditary peers
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
He has no shame !

I’ve read both Starmer and Sunak are looking at some kind of reform of HofL.

For starters remove all non attendees (those with below X% attendance) immediately, reduce total number, limit PM ability to submit endless new peerages (maybe one in one our policy) and stop all hereditary peers

Think that’s a very good idea TBH, arguably better than Labours IMO, but I’m a bit conservative when it comes to the HoL. Get the selection criteria right and enforce attendance and maybe speaking time and I’d be quite happy. This is half of that, just need to look at how remaining nominations are made.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
He has no shame !

I’ve read both Starmer and Sunak are looking at some kind of reform of HofL.

For starters remove all non attendees (those with below X% attendance) immediately, reduce total number, limit PM ability to submit endless new peerages (maybe one in one our policy) and stop all hereditary peers
Fuck it off and make it an elected chamber based on PR.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
They're absolutely pathetic.

It only seems to be the headbangers and Johnson cheerleaders up in arms about it

It's Beergate mkII
Does this mean grenners is going to start using another unfunny nickname for Starmer?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
They're absolutely pathetic.

It only seems to be the headbangers and Johnson cheerleaders up in arms about it

It's Beergate mkII

Real grama issues here
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Also Isobel Oakshott confuses me, she always looks like she is both smelling a fart and in a wind tunnel
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Dan Hodges is hilarious (unintentionally) at the moment. Same as he was during beergate. The right must be really worried about Boris’ future in politics. You can only assume he’s done for and they know it.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Dan Hodges is hilarious (unintentionally) at the moment. Same as he was during beergate. The right must be really worried about Boris’ future in politics. You can only assume he’s done for and they know it.

He seems to be having another meltdown like he did for Beergate.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Dan Hodges is hilarious (unintentionally) at the moment. Same as he was during beergate. The right must be really worried about Boris’ future in politics. You can only assume he’s done for and they know it.

The problem for a lot of them now is which constituencies could you put them in where they’d win-probably only Tory diehard strongholds with retiring MPs. Johnson would be destroyed in his and few people are willing to give up their seat to prolong his career
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
The problem for a lot of them now is which constituencies could you put them in where they’d win-probably only Tory diehard strongholds with retiring MPs. Johnson would be destroyed in his and few people are willing to give up their seat to prolong his career
Local Tories are doing a fair bit of deselecting their sitting MP’s at the moment, 3 already confirmed and I think it’s been suggested that another 3 are on their way out. Unless he gets kicked out of the party I can see Boris giving up his seat and being selected in one of these seats.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
This will be worrying for Sunak as there doesn’t seem to be a bounce from the Windsor deal, which surprises me also. Also worrying for the Boris camp and their client journalists is no evidence that anyone gives 2 shiny ones about the Sue Gray appointment. I think that will worry Sunak too but less so and certainly not as much as no bounce from Windsor.

 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
This will be worrying for Sunak as there doesn’t seem to be a bounce from the Windsor deal, which surprises me also. Also worrying for the Boris camp and their client journalists is no evidence that anyone gives 2 shiny ones about the Sue Gray appointment. I think that will worry Sunak too but less so and certainly not as much as no bo unce from Windsor.


outside of ni no ones really gives a fig about the protocol and in ni no ones for the main parties
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top