Do you want to discuss boring politics? (10 Viewers)

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Was looking this morning, 6/4.
Lab/Lib coalition, 8/1.
Surely if its a hung parliament it will be a lab/lib coalition won't it?
@rob9872 you're the closest we've got to a gambling expert! What do you think?
Not sure of that, but thanks .... I think :)

Tbh I think I'd go hung at smaller odds than coalition. I realise it's Labour this time but the last one did them so much damage and they're only just recovering. Personally I'd assume an agreement where a few concessions are made for regular voting alongside them than a formal coalition.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Not sure of that, but thanks .... I think :)

Tbh I think I'd go hung at smaller odds than coalition. I realise it's Labour this time but the last one did them so much damage and they're only just recovering. Personally I'd assume an agreement where a few concessions are made for regular voting alongside them than a formal coalition.
Last time was as much abandoning a couple of key policies for a stab at power though, and they'd built their base under Kennedy in particular as being left of Labour on taxation etc, and targeted student areas for their votes too... who weren't pleased at the tuition fees policy being scrapped!!

Last time, Labour and Lib Dem were a better match if there was going to be a coalition, but Brown and Clegg didn't get on. This time? Fuck knows what the Lib Dems stand for(!) but I couldn't see it being as disastrous for them if they went into a Labour coalition as their last effort was.

Ultimately depends how many seats they get too, even if a hung parliament it'd be hard to justify a coalition if they only had 9-10 seats. 20-ish+ and it's another matter.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
Not sure of that, but thanks .... I think :)

Tbh I think I'd go hung at smaller odds than coalition. I realise it's Labour this time but the last one did them so much damage and they're only just recovering. Personally I'd assume an agreement where a few concessions are made for regular voting alongside them than a formal coalition.
The danger could be that the anti tory vote gets split.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Last time was as much abandoning a couple of key policies for a stab at power though, and they'd built their base under Kennedy in particular as being left of Labour on taxation etc, and targeted student areas for their votes too... who weren't pleased at the tuition fees policy being scrapped!!

Last time, Labour and Lib Dem were a better match if there was going to be a coalition, but Brown and Clegg didn't get on. This time? Fuck knows what the Lib Dems stand for(!) but I couldn't see it being as disastrous for them if they went into a Labour coalition as their last effort was.

Ultimately depends how many seats they get too, even if a hung parliament it'd be hard to justify a coalition if they only had 9-10 seats. 20-ish+ and it's another matter.
if the locals voting carries over they will have more than 20 seats
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
yeah a hung parliment is a lab/lib coalition
Doesn't have to be a formal coalition though and I think the smaller price is a much safer bet.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
What odds on a Lab/Con coalition if Starmer gets to be the top guy?

Reckon he’d be all over it.
I'm sure he would and I assume with largest party he'd be pm regardless, its more whether the lib dems would risk it (imo)
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I can't understand why there's such a disparity in odds,unless they're thinking of someone else being part of the coalition but that would then be shoeter odds.
can't see labour/snp and the lib dem won't go in with the tories again

anyone who would join the tories will have at most a handful of seats
 

JAM See

Well-Known Member
I was never a royalist but wasn't a republican. I just thought it was a load of bollocks that I had no interest in.
But between Andrews noncing, the queen's funeral and today I think I've been converted into a full on abolitionist!
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
But I thought Labour was rejected at the ballot box yesterday with that piss poor performance?



There's a good piece from the guy you used to run yougov explaining how you you can maybe a 10% to the labour vote if it is a GE

But if the next GE is the same as this election the tories are out of power anyway
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Yes let's ignore the actual general election polling and instead look at the results of a totally different poll.

Yes let’s look at PVA above one of the most respected analysts in this field

It wasn’t a poll by the way it was an election 😂
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Yes let’s look at PVA above one of the most respected analysts in this field

It wasn’t a poll by the way it was an election 😂

Yeah because LD and Greens are going to get like 40% of the GE vote. Great extrapolation.

It shows the Tories are utterly fucked. That's about the only conclusion you can draw from it. It's totally different to a general election vote.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Yeah because LD and Greens are going to get like 40% of the GE vote. Great extrapolation.

It shows the Tories are utterly fucked. That's about the only conclusion you can draw from it. It's totally different to a general election vote.

You’ve drawn a conclusion it’s a labour landslide
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
And he also said this, the same as what I'm saying, but that doesn't fit with your agenda:




That was a very short interview 😂
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
That was a very short interview 😂

As short as the interview you posted.

He also said you can't draw too much from the vote share because people are far more likely to vote Green or LD in a local election.

But again, that doesn't fit your agenda.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
As short as the interview you posted.

He also said you can't draw too much from the vote share because people are far more likely to vote Green or LD in a local election.

But again, that doesn't fit your agenda.
peter kellner said the same

still what do they know compared to a an internet troll from coventry
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA

PVA

Well-Known Member

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Yes I wonder why he didn't post this one


The prospects of Sunak remaining prime minister after the next election look as bleak as ever. But it remains an open question whether Keir Starmer will enjoy an overall majority in the next parliament or end up leading a minority government, and having to prepare for a second election within a year to 18 months, as Harold Wilson did after Labour’s narrow victories in 1964 and 1974.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Not sure of that, but thanks .... I think :)

Tbh I think I'd go hung at smaller odds than coalition. I realise it's Labour this time but the last one did them so much damage and they're only just recovering. Personally I'd assume an agreement where a few concessions are made for regular voting alongside them than a formal coalition.

Yeah it’ll be confidence and supply at worst. TBH I don’t see why they’d need it. Most Labour manifesto stuff would be backed by the SNP Greens and softer LDs or their voters would get annoyed. And the stuff that’s too right wing for them would probably get some Tories on board.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top