Do you want to discuss boring politics? (21 Viewers)

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
haha, probably could be applicable to either, however Johnson still probably doesn’t think he did anything wrong (in his life)

And I don't think Hancock sees himself in politics again, Johnson definitely does so I'm sure Hancock is happy to do anything he can to prevent that happening.
Which if it did, would ironically be a bigger service to the British public than anything he did when he was a minister.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
And I don't think Hancock sees himself in politics again, Johnson definitely does so I'm sure Hancock is happy to do anything he can to prevent that happening.
Which if it did, would ironically be a bigger service to the British public than anything he did when he was a minister.
People seem to forget that MHancock didn’t do nothing that Boris, everyone that apparently worked at Downing Street or Tory HQ including the cronies he’s put in the HOL did. At least MHancock eventually found the self worth to resign. Something let’s not forget Boris expected credit for at the time. I don’t think you can blame him for being bitter all things considered. It’s just a shame it took bitterness for him to tell the truth.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
People seem to forget that MHancock didn’t do nothing that Boris, everyone that apparently worked at Downing Street or Tory HQ including the cronies he’s put in the HOL did. At least MHancock eventually found the self worth to resign. Something let’s not forget Boris expected credit for at the time. I don’t think you can blame him for being bitter all things considered. It’s just a shame it took bitterness for him to tell the truth.

Let’s not forget he was rattling his assistant/colleague behind his wifes back whilst telling the country they couldnt see loved ones. He's as bad as Johnson in my book. Johnson should’ve sacked him but couldn’t… probably because his own misdemeanours !
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Surely makes a mockery out of the raising interest rates to stave off inflation. Never mind hold your nerve, the government needs to grow a backbone

 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Might be part of a bigger play but potentially MHancock has grown a set of principles, currently giving evidence to the Covid enquiry. He’s finally admitted that the government didn’t know if care homes had the the right protection describing the situation as terrible. He’s apologised directly to the families present and said that the government was more concerned about having enough body bags and where were we going to bury them (let the bodies pile high said Boris lad). He seems to be treating the enquiry as a confession.
If only there had been some way to ensure care homes had that protection. Some sort of tendering process that matched those capable of producing the necessary goods to those who needed them.

But due to a failure to initiate such a system ministers were forced to just ask their mates and local pub landlords if they could help and reluctantly having to give them the money.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
So Sunak is going to try and 'but Corbyn' his way to an election win.

13 years and this is all they've got. They're fucked, hopefully for a long time.


 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
So Sunak is going to try and 'but Corbyn' his way to an election win.

13 years and this is all they've got. They're fucked, hopefully for a long time.


Well to be fair it's the least Starmer deserves, he joined in on the Corbyn character assassination and the ball is rebounding. Neither of the two parties have any answers at all I'm afraid.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Well to be fair it's the least Starmer deserves, he joined in on the Corbyn character assassination and the ball is rebounding. Neither of the two parties have any answers at all I'm afraid.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Somehow I don't think he'll be losing any sleep over it.

They've tried it before and the best they could come up with was his school turned private after he joined and he had a beer once.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
So Sunak is going to try and 'but Corbyn' his way to an election win.

13 years and this is all they've got. They're fucked, hopefully for a long time.



He really has run out of ideas. Neither him or Starmer have any character. Prepare to see the opinion polls not move one way or the other.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Somehow I don't think he'll be losing any sleep over it.

They've tried it before and the best they could come up with was his school turned private after he joined and he had a beer once.
Well yes, he's a shameless liar so why would he

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
If you provide universal school meals in Primary school then you can support families and young children in adopting good eating habits early on.
so you spend the money on food for kids who are likely eating well instead of other areas of the education system

the richer kids are likely eating much better diets than the poorer kids are

when a budget is finite it makes no sense to spend money on helping those who don't need the help
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
so you spend the money on food for kids who are likely eating well instead of other areas of the education system

the richer kids are likely eating much better diets than the poorer kids are

when a budget is finite it makes no sense to spend money on helping those who don't need the help
And how exactly will you do that? Means testing?

The fact is that the difference in providing for primary kids universally as opposed to going through a pointless process (wasting other resources) will end up being negligible.

But we can’t have any hope for the kids can we? As long as we keep the fiscal rules happy.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
so you spend the money on food for kids who are likely eating well instead of other areas of the education system

the richer kids are likely eating much better diets than the poorer kids are

when a budget is finite it makes no sense to spend money on helping those who don't need the help

You do both. There’s a culture behind food you lack currently as well that feeds into adulthood. A bunch of kids eating basically cookies and Radnor Fizz for lunch each day isn’t how you tackle an obesity epidemic. That’s before you even get to impact on learning.

FSM/PP doesn’t come close to reaching the kids it’s needs to and lack of buy in means the offerings are generally pretty poor. Picking the gold standard here but compare Japan to us.

This is “charge for the NHS” type thinking.
 

Seaside-Skyblue

Well-Known Member
And how exactly will you do that? Means testing?

The fact is that the difference in providing for primary kids universally as opposed to going through a pointless process (wasting other resources) will end up being negligible.

But we can’t have any hope for the kids can we? As long as we keep the fiscal rules happy.
This is actually a fair point, there possibly is an admin burden on deciphering which kids would get it and those that don't which may eat into any cost savings it would intend on achieving. Probably going off on a tangent here but I also think it helps improve equality too and goes a small way of (for want of a better way to describe...) leveling things out from a social class perspective. I remember being the kid with free meals and I felt a little inferior to the kids with packed lunches as even then I knew it was because I was from a poorer household - and I also had to get my dinner separately from them and it wasn't an inclusive setup. Not looking for a violin but reflecting on it, I think there's definitely wider benefits than just cost.

Sent from my SM-A346B using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
So what do we think Farage had had his accounts frozen for? Something foreign government related is my guess.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
So what do we think Farage had had his accounts frozen for? Something foreign government related is my guess.

The establishment are trying to silence the anti establishment banker with a Coutts account and links to Russia, if they come for him they could come for you!! (Except most of us aren't Putin shills!).
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I was reading up on PEP’s and I think Ferage is overstating his importance. When he was an MEP he would have been classified as a PEP under UK law but his PEP status would have elapsed 12 months after he stopped being an MEP under UK law. It’s more likely he’s classed as “guilty” by association to a PEP which apparently is the other way PEP laws in the UK can affect an individual. My guess is it’s Trump related.

It’s either that or it’s nothing to do with PEP status either his or anyone else’s and it’s related to criminal activity.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I thought he just had an Intelligent Finance current account...
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
An overview of the Ferage story


He apparently has an interesting choice in bank. I’m sure a patriot like him pays ALL his taxes in the spirit of the system but the bank he apparently uses seems to be the bank of choice if you’re involved tax avoidance schemes.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Genius plan, there's only 165K jobs they can't fill in the care sector
A gang of Tory MPs is trying to force Rishi Sunak to stop foreign staff taking jobs in care homes - despite a huge number of vacancies.

The New Conservatives Group on Monday will demand the struggling PM adopt their extreme plan for immigration.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Yes I saw that. It’s disgusting really and would clearly be an absolute disaster.

No surprise to see the group contains Anderson and Gullis.

I think it’s just a group of red wallers desperate to cling onto their seats.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top