shmmeee
Well-Known Member
No. You vote for a person not a party.
Do you want to discuss boring politics? (25 Viewers)
- Thread starter mrtrench
- Start date
No. You vote for a person not a party.
Nope! They have been continually delayed since 2021. Shambles.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
If my MP defected to the tories I'd want a by election and be pissed off if it didn't happen.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
there's an GE this and he's standing down
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Yeah, appreciate that, just a general point I think there should by elections in these circumstances but can see why its a wate of time and effort on this occasion.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
So they should miss the chance to give the tories yet another kicking? Especially when it is an NHS doctor saying he is leaving the tories as they are killing the NHS?
He isn't standing in the GE, short term gain and non long term pain.
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
Yes. Do you think anyone is going to be swayed to vote Labour because of this? He was a Tory health minister.
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
So if one of the Cov MP's suddenly defected to the Tories everyone would just be "No, fair enough. I voted for the person not the party".
If we vote for the person why even bother putting their party on the ballot paper?
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Not when they're chancers who follow the way the wind blows for their career.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
The shocking thing about that sentence is how many MP’s that could apply too. The two previous PM’s for starters.
duffer
Well-Known Member
You vote for a person based on what party they're representing, surely.
Otherwise, as said elsewhere, why would prospective candidates tie themselves to party policies and discipline and have the party name printed directly next to theirs on the ballot paper.
I'd bet a reasonably large number of regular voters couldn't tell you the name of their MP, but they'll know what party they voted for.
If as an MP you're confident that people will vote for you regardless of your change of party allegiance, why not give them a chance to do so in a by-election? That sounds like democracy to me.
JAM See
Well-Known Member
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Lord Lazy of Bullingdon slumming it
amp.theguardian.com
David Cameron under fire for hiring £42m luxury jet for central Asia tour | David Cameron | The Guardian
Foreign secretary’s use of Embraer Lineage 1000 follows £348,000 bill for James Cleverly’s eight-day trip in similar plane in 2023
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
I see the Irish are a bit confused.....
I'm sure it was only last month their Govt. & courts declared the UK as "unsafe" to send migrants.....
I'm sure it was only last month their Govt. & courts declared the UK as "unsafe" to send migrants.....
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Long held Tories being very comfortable in your party is a really good thing. Really it is.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Look at that record, I'm sure he's had a damascene conversion to social democracy
www.theyworkforyou.com
Voting record - Daniel Poulter, former MP, Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
See how Daniel Poulter voted on topics like Employment, Social Issues, Foreign Policy, and more.
www.theyworkforyou.com
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Having more votes than the opposition is a good thing. Every Labour MP is a good MP. Even if you lose them on some policy there’s only so many times you can break the whip and stay in the party.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Douglas Ross making a cast iron case for why the UK should have had a general election over 2 years ago through the medium of calling for a Scottish election.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
It's a broad church I guess, unless you are left wing
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Don’t be ridiculous.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Pissing it in the polls and yet
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
In the interest of balance there’s no suggestion in the article that they intend to not increase workers rights just some aspects will be in consultation with industry. Fact is Labour are still going to improve workers rights and apparently in the first 100 days. What you personally won’t admit also is that some of what labour has to reverse is a result of rights lost by Brexit, especially rights to strike which came into force in under Sunak and the EU is currently considering a response to as they believe it may be in breach of the Brexit agreement. Maybe you should have been a bit more concerned about workers rights when you voted Brexit.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Shut up you Tory idiot. The point is that once again Kier Starmer has reneged on something he'd said he'd do. He is not to be trusted. There need not be 'consultation with business' - such conversations are just an invitation to water things down.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
The irony being that it’s very difficult for workers to gain collective negotiation rights with their employers thanks to decades of increasingly restrictive trade union laws. How many anti union laws did the Blair and Brown governments repeal? None.
So I remain unconvinced that Starmer will.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Stating facts makes you an idiot. Interesting. Unfortunately for you pretty much every trade union has spent the last few years pointing out those facts. What has Starmer actually promised on this? I can see they’ve done a paper on workers rights but I can’t see that they’ve actually announced policy other than to repeal Sunak’s Minimum Service Laws in the first 100 days. That’s the law they brought in because you trusted them by voting leave. Hey, sounds like Starmer is your man.
There is nothing to exploit, all vehicles are checked for illegal goods at the port as normal.
The checks are purely to check the paper trail at the clearing agent which is something the EU has insisted on not the UK.
The checks couldn’t be done at the port as it would get clogged up.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
The EU wouldn't have to insist on it if we hadn't left.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
The EU hasn’t insisted on anything. That’s just how it’s done anywhere in the world on shipments from somewhere else in the world with the exception of inside the EU. If something is shipped from Australia into the UK under the free trade agreement we have with them you still have to use the same system and processes we volunteered to use on EU shipments by voting leave. Australia don’t make us do it, that’s just how it is. We just simply didn’t prepare for it with our biggest trading partner and the traditional shipping routes we use when trading with them which is why we kept delaying it, it’s as simple as that. It’s almost as if it wasn’t our idea.
Last edited:
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
It’s being reported that Boris Johnson, the PM who insisted that we had to introduce voter ID to stop voter fraud (that doesn’t exist on numbers big enough that you can’t count them on one hand) and is definitely not a tool to hamper voter turnout amongst a demographic that would probably vote for someone else, was turned away from his polling station as he had no ID on him.