Do you want to discuss boring politics? (143 Viewers)

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
What next? Somebody paying to have a filling at a dentist because they can't get in with the NHS one?

I am sure they will be paying the same taxes as everybody else.
If you have to go private for health or dentistry, you should be allowed to claim the NHS tariff to offset the private cost. NHS services are supposed to be there and an entitlement.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
If you have to go private for health or dentistry, you should be allowed to claim the NHS tariff to offset the private cost. NHS services are supposed to be there and an entitlement.

Happens in a lot of countries. It’s just this everything is free at the point of delivery here where it does t happen.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
That makes no sense.

It's not about the cost as far as i am concerned. I just don't agree with private education on principle nor private healthcare. These are services which should be available to everyone equally. Private education perpetuates inequality and privilege.
If you have to go private for health or dentistry, you should be allowed to claim the NHS tariff to offset the private cost. NHS services are supposed to be there and an entitlement.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
But that’s not the reality with schooling. People using private education are not doing it because their child is going to miss the start of term in state education if they don’t. Fair play to anyone willing to do it just don’t expect everyone else to subsidise the luxury with a tax break.
maybe the tax break recognises that they are basically paying For education twice?
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
If you have to go private for health or dentistry, you should be allowed to claim the NHS tariff to offset the private cost. NHS services are supposed to be there and an entitlement.

Crazy idea, I know, but maybe if the sixth(?) wealthiest country in the world distributed its wealth slightly more equitably, there wouldn't be quite the same need for private health and dentistry.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Crazy idea, I know, but maybe if the sixth(?) wealthiest country in the world distributed its wealth slightly more equitably, there wouldn't be quite the same need for private health and dentistry.
But it hasn’t we are where we are and the NHS isn’t providing the necessary capacity and won’t until the new Labour government gets NHS staff working loads of overtime. If that will be legal.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Crazy idea, I know, but maybe if the sixth(?) wealthiest country in the world distributed its wealth slightly more equitably, there wouldn't be quite the same need for private health and dentistry.
the state of access to dentists is exactly why any so-called 'imrpovements' in the wider NHS should be scrutinised to an inch of their lives. Imagine not being able to get an NHS doctor within 10 miles of your house...
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Crazy idea, I know, but maybe if the sixth(?) wealthiest country in the world distributed its wealth slightly more equitably, there wouldn't be quite the same need for private health and dentistry.

There is in pretty much every country in the western world? Why do the uk think it’s a special case where people with wealth can’t have better services? Where else is this a thing?
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
maybe the tax break recognises that they are basically paying For education twice?

Nope, it's because of this...

"Private schools do not have to charge value added tax (VAT) on their fees because of a legal exemption for organisations providing education.

About half of England's private schools are also charities, so receive an 80% reduction on business rates (taxes on properties used for commercial purposes)."

 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
the state of access to dentists is exactly why any so-called 'imrpovements' in the wider NHS should be scrutinised to an inch of their lives. Imagine not being able to get an NHS doctor within 10 miles of your house...

Blair and the Labour Party destroyed NHS dentistry
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
But it hasn’t we are where we are and the NHS isn’t providing the necessary capacity and won’t until the new Labour government gets NHS staff working loads of overtime. If that will be legal.

"We are where we are" isn't really a compelling argument against change, is it?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Nope, it's because of this...

"Private schools do not have to charge value added tax (VAT) on their fees because of a legal exemption for organisations providing education.

About half of England's private schools are also charities, so receive an 80% reduction on business rates (taxes on properties used for commercial purposes)."

That doesn’t explain why education organisations are exempt.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Blair and the Labour Party destroyed NHS dentistry
Well it was before that. I actually couldn't get myself registered with an NHS dentist once mine closed down, and that was under Major's government. 1992, gvernment cut fees to NHS dentists by 7%, that's where the root (no pun intended) cause is.
 

Nuskyblue

Well-Known Member
You keep saying about 60k take home, i have literally shown the workings out and it is based on 2 parents earning 30k each before tax.

Yes, with sacrifices for 1 kid it's doable.
I think you're right.

It is doable, a hell of a commitment but doable.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well it was before that. I actually couldn't get myself registered with an NHS dentist once mine closed down, and that was under Major's government. 1992, gvernment cut fees to NHS dentists by 7%, that's where the root (no pun intended) cause is.

Their new contract was a disaster

 

duffer

Well-Known Member
That doesn’t explain why education organisations are exempt.

No it doesn't. Could the historical reason be related to the fact that most Tories (most MPs, possibly) and their benefactors, benefitted financially from this unusual state of affairs?

Ah, just call me cynical, I'm sure these inconsistent tax breaks were all down to their innate charity and desire to improve the world we live in.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You couldn't be more wrong.

Well I couldn’t because I suspect if your child was in a sink estate school or your wife wanted a hip replacement you’d think more of their needs than your precious principles
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
No it doesn't. Could the historical reason be related to the fact that most Tories (most MPs, possibly) and their benefactors, benefitted financially from this unusual state of affairs?

Ah, just call me cynical, I'm sure these inconsistent tax breaks were all down to their innate charity and desire to improve the world we live in.
We have had Labour governments before, and politicians attendance at private schools is not limited to the Tories,didn’t Tony Blair attend Fettes?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
We have had Labour governments before, and politicians attendance at private schools is not limited to the Tories,didn’t Tony Blair attend Fettes?

And Dianne Abbott of course took the private option
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
Was charging for prescriptions Labour or the Conservatives. I forget which one of the right wing parties it was.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Getting required medical attention is a necessity not a luxury.
Think more and more people will be pushed to private as there's no other option. Following my recent stay in hospital there's two things they want to investigate as potential causes, I've been told both should happen relatively urgently.

My appointment for one is June next year. For the other they sent me a choice of five places I could go, none of which have an appointment available in the next two years.

So next week I have an appointment with my GP to discuss getting this done privately despite the fact I can't afford it and will be getting into debt.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
AnThink more and more people will be pushed to private as there's no other option. Following my recent stay in hospital there's two things they want to investigate as potential causes, I've been told both should happen relatively urgently.

My appointment for one is June next year. For the other they sent me a choice of five places I could go, none of which have an appointment available in the next two years.

So next week I have an appointment with my GP to discuss getting this done privately despite the fact I can't afford it and will be getting into debt.
This is exactly the situation wherein patients should be able to claim NHS tariff to offset the cost of private treatment. I had to have cataract surgery done privately because the wait was so long I would have permanently lost sight in the affected eye.

I’m not sure where the concept of patient choice stands these days - I hope you manage to get your situation resolved satisfactorily.
 

Nick

Administrator
Think more and more people will be pushed to private as there's no other option. Following my recent stay in hospital there's two things they want to investigate as potential causes, I've been told both should happen relatively urgently.

My appointment for one is June next year. For the other they sent me a choice of five places I could go, none of which have an appointment available in the next two years.

So next week I have an appointment with my GP to discuss getting this done privately despite the fact I can't afford it and will be getting into debt.
Sorry to hear that. That's my point with this stuff is that you shouldn't be in that position but you have to get things done.

Get well soon!
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member

Sick Boy

Super Moderator


I genuinely wouldn’t be surprised to see him back in the Tories at some point soon and part of a leadership contest. There’s definitely a bit of sleepwalking going on with all this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top