Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Coventry area. It doesn't say anywhere outside of the City. They must have included the word 'area' for a reason.
Coventry area. It doesn't say anywhere outside of the City. They must have included the word 'area' for a reason.I am opposed to a groundshare outside of coventry as an alternative to being expelled.
i.e. I'd rather be kicked out of the league than play outside the city.
It could be worded better but it's hardly the dead sea scrolls.
Irony of it all is that if that was what happened we'd probably just groundshare outside the city anyway but in non league.
But Rugby isn't the Coventry area, its the Rugby area.Coventry area. It doesn't say anywhere outside of the City. They must have included the word 'area' for a reason.
It's more the Coventry area than somewhere 50 miles away.But Rugby isn't the Coventry area, its the Rugby area.
It really isn't that hard to read it. Its saying against a ground share as an alternative to expulsion.But you don't get to that bit if you can agree a ground share in the Coventry area.
That's not the option, else it would say "ground share in the Coventry area" to choose.It's more the Coventry area than somewhere 50 miles away.
If you're reading 'Coventry area' as being the same as just Coventry, then you're right. I just think they mean somewhere wider than just the City boundaries.
Against a ground share outside of the Coventry area.It really isn't that hard to read it. Its saying against a ground share as an alternative to expulsion.
Therefore, it's preferring expulsion.
As an alternative to expulsion.Against a ground share outside of the Coventry area.
Would still need a ground share, just outside the football League so guess it would give more options.Wonder where we would play if we did get expelled?
Plus, what would happen to the Academy 2 rating also?
Exactly.Would still need a ground share, just outside the football League so guess it would give more options.
But Rugby isn't the Coventry area, its the Rugby area.
So if we move to Rugby there won’t be a single person complaining I assume?How is a CV post code not the Coventry area?
Rugby's a positively local CV postcode, too!So if we move to Rugby there won’t be a single person complaining I assume?
No other doesn't. These are all last ditch options.I read it as saying it's a vote for a more local ground share. It's the best option if a Ricoh deal can't be done.
It's also saying if we can't find a ground within 50 miles we'll be expelled, so it's asking for your favoured approach. My favoured approach is a ground share in the Coventry area (undefined). Just because you have a favoured approach it doesn't mean the others wouldn't be considered acceptable, and surely no one actually believes the EFL will only put into action the winning survey result.No other doesn't. These are all last ditch options.
A) Ground share up to 50 miles away unconditional.
B) Ground share upto 50 miles away conditional on plan to return.
C) If no local groundshare can be agreed you would rather we are expelled from the league than have the club move from the Coventry area next season.
It's also saying if we can't find a ground within 50 miles we'll be expelled, so it's asking for your favoured approach. My favoured approach is a ground share in the Coventry area (undefined). Just because you have a favoured approach it doesn't mean the others wouldn't be considered acceptable, and surely no one actually believes the EFL will only put into action the winning survey result.
I doubt people are voting in such numbers for an expulsion, maybe they just favour the option of a local ground share rather than one further away.That isn't an option though? Effectively people are voting for expulsion...
I doubt people are voting in such numbers for an expulsion, maybe they just favour the option of a local ground share rather than one further away.
Yeah I feel the same, I wish you could read it properly, but hey ho, let's move on.That isn't one of the options, they are voting for expulsion.
Was talking to someone yesterday who said and was serious what about playing all our games away from home !! I laughed. But then faced with all the scenarios we have it’s another option I suppose and better than expulsion.
Yeah I feel the same, I wish you could read it properly, but hey ho, let's move on.
Yeah I feel the same, I wish you could read it properly, but hey ho, let's move on.
How are people voting for an option that doesn’t exist?I doubt people are voting in such numbers for an expulsion, maybe they just favour the option of a local ground share rather than one further away.
So if we move to Rugby there won’t be a single person complaining I assume?
That isn't an option though? Effectively people are voting for expulsion...
People are voting for the EFL to threaten Sisu with expulsion in the hope it forces them to deal. You know this. You know 60% of fans don’t want the club expelled.
No, they are voting for expulsion. Whether they just want the threat or not.
OK.
If you honestly believe 60% of fans want the club expelled from the league I can’t help you.
Binley Woods is RugbyRugby's a positively local CV postcode, too!
OK.
If you honestly believe 60% of fans want the club expelled from the league I can’t help you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?