It’s not destroying it - it’s gambling but not destroying. SISU have no money left. The club has no stability. They have two options… one is more preferable of courseBy destroying it mmmmmmm good one
Baggage carouselNot long off the plane . What the fuck is going on now ?
Oh yes it’s obvious from the general reaction it’s me whose struggling isn’t it?
Call it a hostile takeover… Ashley wants it, he’s gonna get it shortly, he’s just speeding up the processWhat general reaction? Nobody has really reacted.
Look, pointless going backwards and forwards.
I will choose to condemn the eviction notice as an unduly aggressive act that was not necessary at this stage and which could be hugely damaging. I see it as an attack on my football club, which I have always managed to divorce from the ownership. It should not be defended or justified imo. If you disagree with that, fine.
I see no value is dredging up past Sisu mistakes, of which there are too many to count. It serves no purpose.
But what have they told us? Just that the second deal wasn’t acceptable but not why they failed to sign the first. Thing is we get this over and over and the only constant is Sisu. First it’s ACL, then CCC, then AHC, then Wasps, then Storey, then Ashley. At some point the old “if everyone is a dickhead, you’re the dickhead” adage comes into play.
Call it a hostile takeover… Ashley wants it, he’s gonna get it shortly, he’s just speeding up the process
There’s no reason to buy a football stadium and end the only tenant.I'm not convinced he wants it, but if he does, he has no right to play Russian Roulette with something so precious to so many people. It's a very shitty play.
It doesn't end well. We're evicted, we relocate again (we have form) and the EFL agree to it.
Surely, common sense will prevail though. I suspect even SISU have had enough. Maybe he is banking on that.
He just needs to get on the phone with a price, this way does seem awfully long winded if the club is really his aimI'm not convinced he wants it, but if he does, he has no right to play Russian Roulette with something so precious to so many people. It's a very shitty play.
It doesn't end well. We're evicted, we relocate again (we have form) and the EFL agree to it.
Surely, common sense will prevail though. I suspect even SISU have had enough. Maybe he is banking on that.
It doesn't show him as a caring custodian for our club, does it.I'm not convinced he wants it, but if he does, he has no right to play Russian Roulette with something so precious to so many people. It's a very shitty play.
If he offers a Slazenger trakkie and a mug for a stable club he’s not getting it.He just needs to get on the phone with a price, this way does seem awfully long winded if the club is really his aim
I suspect sisu are asking for far too much and this is the next move in trying to drive that downHe just needs to get on the phone with a price, this way does seem awfully long winded if the club is really his aim
Hope to get it cheaper = result.He just needs to get on the phone with a price, this way does seem awfully long winded if the club is really his aim
What you basing this on?Even if King was legit (he wasnt), he will clear off as soon as he can after this latest development
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
What general reaction? Nobody has really reacted.
Look, pointless going backwards and forwards.
I will choose to condemn the eviction notice as an unduly aggressive act that was not necessary at this stage and which could be hugely damaging. I see it as an attack on my football club, which I have always managed to divorce from the ownership. It should not be defended or justified imo. If you disagree with that, fine.
I see no value is dredging up past Sisu mistakes, of which there are too many to count. It serves no purpose.
The owner is clearly desperate to sell anywayIf he offers a Slazenger trakkie and a mug for a stable club he’s not getting it.
a club about to be homeless without a pot to piss in might be more amenable
The second half could well be true though couldn't it. A club with zero lease and zero sign of a new ground being built is somewhat less desirable than that he thinks he bought (he did say he'd looked at the agreement, and he thought it was still valid, didn't he)What you basing this on?
But not on MAs termsThe owner is clearly desperate to sell anyway
YesThe second half could well be true though couldn't it. A club with zero lease and zero sign of a new ground being built is somewhat less desirable than that he thinks he bought (he did say he'd looked at the agreement, and he thought it was still valid, didn't he)
Think Big Mike has his eye on them for beverage storageCan we put a bid in for that stadium in Qatar made out of storage containers? Starts to be dismantled the second the Brazil game finishes
They've been gloating all over twitter, and they wonder why they're disliked.
Our former slum landlords soon dropped their ‘Think about the potential job losses’ attitude soon enough…
Perhaps Boddy was afraid that you would accuse him of signing an agreement without trying to get the best deal for CFFCWhy didn’t we sign the original pre sale contact which gave us tenancy until 2031
The fact that he's gone to ground would seem to suggest he is not in control of the narrative, as well as the fact the FA have supposedly said they have not yet taken the fit and proper scrutiny test. Any new owner would be front and centre trying to secure the clubs future. SISU's gambling means we City supporter's take another kick in the taters.What you basing this on?
To be expected - we’ll have the last laugh againThey've been gloating all over twitter, and they wonder why they're disliked.
They've been gloating all over twitter, and they wonder why they're disliked.
Maybe others have said how much they want sisu to just sort things out. Statement is from the club isn’t it. I feel quite sorry for those at ccfc trying to resolve thingsThe fact that he's gone to ground would seem to suggest he is not in control of the narrative, as well as the fact the FA have supposedly said they have not yet taken the fit and proper scrutiny test. Any new owner would be front and centre trying to secure the clubs future. SISU's gambling means we City supporter's take another kick in the taters.
Trueits fair enough we’d do the same
It doesn't show him as a caring custodian for our club, does it.
Can we put a bid in for that stadium in Qatar made out of storage containers? Starts to be dismantled the second the Brazil game finishes
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?