Again, it's not my area,so this might be naive but... I'd have thought, given the likes of King were studying the original deal and considering it to still be valid, and the club consider the original deal something they were happy to continue under, then the thing to do would have been to sign the mirror deal (if Frasers are being honest of course, and it genuinely was the same as that which had gone before), build relationships, and make your requests from a position of actually having a deal in place, rather than having to start from scratch.
God knows what’s going on NW. I agree, we are assuming that what FG have said is correct/true ie SISU were offered the same terms. I’m guessing they didn’t want to sign it because they’re probably trying to squeeze FG for a better deal and/or get Ashley/FG to panic that they’re not going to have a tenant…that’s going well !