SkyblueDad
Well-Known Member
You do realise if we ‘don’t play’ in 9 days that will probably be the end of ccfc.
At the beginning of the season when the pitch was deemed unplayable we developed a contingency plan, so I'm sure we are working on one now.You do realise if we ‘don’t play’ in 9 days that will probably be the end of ccfc.
That's not true and even if it was, we currently don't have a ground to play at in 9 days... that's the fact is it not?You do realise if we ‘don’t play’ in 9 days that will probably be the end of ccfc.
What part of what I said isn't true?
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Pretty sure the eviction notice is up the day before the Swansea gameIf you want to be pedantic an eviction notice requires 28 days after presentation
That's not true and even if it was, we currently don't have a ground to play at in 9 days... that's the fact is it not?
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
I can’t believe grown adults can be so dim.
Are our badges still up?Yes we do, I just drove past it.
Apparently but certainly not a donkey walloperAren't you an adult?
Surely they can't add a charge after administrationAs I have no clue where we put wasps things now.
One of the bond holders is saying there is a charge on WHL from Canmango aka Richardson that was not disclosed and pre dates the bond.
Does this mean to bond holders are going to be screwed on the sale of the arena or p share or both
The charge has been shown on Companies House for a few years so hard to understand how it isn't disclosed. In any event I thought it was subservient to the bond holders charge. Are the bondholders still hoping for a return from the sale of the P share?As I have no clue where we put wasps things now.
One of the bond holders is saying there is a charge on WHL from Canmango aka Richardson that was not disclosed and pre dates the bond.
Does this mean to bond holders are going to be screwed on the sale of the arena or p share or both
The charge has been shown on Companies House for a few years so hard to understand how it isn't disclosed. In any event I thought it was subservient to the bond holders charge. Are the bondholders still hoping for a return from the sale of the P share?
It may be that in the case of Worcester DCMS are a senior creditor | ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
I received the link from the Trustee yesterday. chris.hobbs@usbank.com or cdrm@usbank.com Have you registered yet? | ||
Edit. Just realised you mean p13 of the WHL proposals ! | ||
I have no expertise in any of this, and there may be other clauses that are relevant that I've missed. The WHL proposals, p13, say that the administrators have asked their solicitors to review and check the validity of all this, so presumably it isn't straightforward ! | ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
I have asked 3 lawyers and have 4 answers = it seems the tenant should be afforded a reasonable time to vacatePretty sure the eviction notice is up the day before the Swansea game
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Interesting if Richardson hangs onto the p share....
Having a look now, he had two debentures that pre date the bond, but also issued a charge on the same day as the bond. Always had a feeling that he would ultimately be protected in this.
Do you have a link that works to the WHL administrators proposals?That one filed on the same day is suspicious as would not be in the bond documents as dint exist at that point.
this is wasps structure. I still think Richardson is gonna come away from this with some ££
View attachment 27674
I can’t believe grown adults can be so dim.
Been mirror shopping?
Bondholders do seem to feel they are going to be shafted again. Perhaps they will report Wasps directors.
Do you have a link that works to the WHL administrators
Seems a bit strange to me that Frasers are basing their strategy (including buying the CBS) on the idea that they'll be able to build a new HQ at Ansty, when they haven't even put in a proper application for it yet?viewFrasers Group PLC
(
LSE:FRAS
)
Frasers Group in confident mood as it delivers bumper half-year profits
Frasers Group PLC (LSE:FRAS) said it remains confident of delivering full-year pre-tax profits of between £450mln to £500mln as it posted bumper interim profits bucking the weak retail environment.
“Whilst the macroeconomic environment is clearly challenging and the backdrop for the coming year is hard to predict with any certainty, we have strong strategic and trading momentum behind us and we remain confident in our guidance,” David Daly, Frasers non-executive chairman said in the results statement.
The FTSE 100-listed retailer, owned by Mike Ashley, saw pre-tax profits rise by 38.8% to £267.1mln in the half-year to 23 October 2022 while group revenues advanced 12.7% to £2,638mln.
Analysts a City broker Liberum Capital described the numbers as "very impressive when set against the strong prior year period and tough trading backdrop."
The owner of Sports Direct said UK Sports Retail revenue increased by 11.6%, largely due to the acquisition of Studio Retail while Premium Lifestyle revenue rose 24.7%, largely due to new Flannels stores and continued growth online.
Margins did come under pressure, dropping to 42.0% from 44.7% reflecting mix effects, strong comparatives, cost of goods inflation, and a maintained inventory provision percentage.
Further expansion is likely in 2023 with the group planning growth “ both organically and through disciplined acquisitions” with “a number of opportunities currently being assessed” in Europe.
Frasers said it intends to invest around £600mln in a new distribution centre and offices in Coventry, with the acquisition of the CBS Arena in the city being part of this strategy.
No dividend was paid.
Frasers Group in confident mood as it delivers bumper half-year profits
Frasers Group PLC (LSE:FRAS) said it remains confident of delivering full-year pre-tax profits of between £450mln to £500mln as it posted bumper interim...www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk
It is round hereSeems a bit strange to me that Frasers are basing their strategy (including buying the CBS) on the idea that they'll be able to build a new HQ at Ansty, when they haven't even put in a proper application for it yet?
I'm sure people will respond that they must have been given a nod and a wink, but that's not how it works for such a huge development.
Seems a bit strange to me that Frasers are basing their strategy (including buying the CBS) on the idea that they'll be able to build a new HQ at Ansty, when they haven't even put in a proper application for it yet?
I'm sure people will respond that they must have been given a nod and a wink, but that's not how it works for such a huge development.
Wouldn't the land where the CBS is be ideal for a HQ? The location is ideal logistically?Seems a bit strange to me that Frasers are basing their strategy (including buying the CBS) on the idea that they'll be able to build a new HQ at Ansty, when they haven't even put in a proper application for it yet?
I'm sure people will respond that they must have been given a nod and a wink, but that's not how it works for such a huge development.
How did CCC do that ?Even though it's not in their area, they have Cov Council onside because they helped fuck over SISU.
Which land?Wouldn't the land where the CBS is be ideal for a HQ? The location is ideal logistically?
How did CCC do that ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?