Nick, you're a puzzle to me. You go to all the trouble of creating this forum for CCFC fans and we all thank you for that.
Yet at every turn you show a total lack of passion for the club, it's all sitting on the fence, being objective, fair minded etc. etc. You pour scorn and cold water on most fan initiatives and clearly without any shadow of doubt show an amazing tolerance for us being in Northampton. You mock those on the hill. I'd give all of them a seat in the VIP box at the Ricoh when we go back. I'd ban the Sixfields lot. Truly they are the epitome of selfish, self centred people. Putting themselves before the club. In years to come true City fans will hardly believe there would be people who supported the rotten Sisu regime in another town.
We don't know RFC, wish him no bother, but his blind acceptance of our position in Northampton and allegiance to Sisu is like a broken record. He may as well wave a white hankie of surrender. I suspect he'd support the team if they moved to Hull.
There's no question that four home games in the boycott is having an impact.
If we do move back to the Ricoh is it going to be because of the people on the hill? I hope we do move back
Is that fact??? You are not
In a position to say that, they would never admit that the lack of support is the reason why they would talk, it shows weakness, as it would if they admitted that the protests where hurting them, your comment is not fact, keep up the protests and the nopm!! It has significance!!
Nick, you're a puzzle to me. You go to all the trouble of creating this forum for CCFC fans and we all thank you for that.
Yet at every turn you show a total lack of passion for the club, it's all sitting on the fence, being objective, fair minded etc. etc. You pour scorn and cold water on most fan initiatives and clearly without any shadow of doubt show an amazing tolerance for us being in Northampton. You mock those on the hill. I'd give all of them a seat in the VIP box at the Ricoh when we go back. I'd ban the Sixfields lot. Truly they are the epitome of selfish, self centred people. Putting themselves before the club. In years to come true City fans will hardly believe there would be people who supported the rotten Sisu regime in another town.
We don't know RFC, wish him no bother, but his blind acceptance of our position in Northampton and allegiance to Sisu is like a broken record. He may as well wave a white hankie of surrender. I suspect he'd support the team if they moved to Hull.
There's no question that four home games in the boycott is having an impact.
What A total and utter lot of nonsense IMHO. I support the Manager & the Team and will be at Sixfields a week on Sunday PUSB!
I'd ban the Sixfields lot. Truly they are the epitome of selfish, self centred people. Putting themselves before the club.
Nick; look back over RFC's posts over a number of threads and hopefully you will appreciate why he/she winds people up to the point where they respond as Italia did. I tried to engage in rational debate with RFC and got insults and wind ps in return. Wasn't looking to take this off topic.
Don't you read his pathetic and childish comments ?
Nick, you're a puzzle to me. You go to all the trouble of creating this forum for CCFC fans and we all thank you for that.
Yet at every turn you show a total lack of passion for the club, it's all sitting on the fence, being objective, fair minded etc. etc. You pour scorn and cold water on most fan initiatives and clearly without any shadow of doubt show an amazing tolerance for us being in Northampton. You mock those on the hill. I'd give all of them a seat in the VIP box at the Ricoh when we go back. I'd ban the Sixfields lot. Truly they are the epitome of selfish, self centred people. Putting themselves before the club. In years to come true City fans will hardly believe there would be people who supported the rotten Sisu regime in another town.
We don't know RFC, wish him no bother, but his blind acceptance of our position in Northampton and allegiance to Sisu is like a broken record. He may as well wave a white hankie of surrender. I suspect he'd support the team if they moved to Hull.
There's no question that four home games in the boycott is having an impact.
How is trying to see every side not having passion for the club? Are the only fans with passion the ones who agree with you?
It is the so called fans who would rather see the club screwed over than the council lose any money? They think it is fine for acl.to charge us massive rent but if sisu did it, they would just be greedy.
It is fans like you causing a divide.
Who knows, when Joe Elliott is chairman he can give them all seats in the box???
There is a divide already. Those going to Sixfields and those not. We are not creating a divide.
We are 99.9% together against SISU plan to build a new stadium and 99.9% together on moving back to the Ricoh.
People will debate obviously on terms of moving back.
People 'one lining' saying SISU are great, I love the new stadium, I support the team and you don't etc just wind people up and RFC is in that category.
Don't mind him but don't complain when he gets some back.
When it all sorts out we can have fun reminding them. (or Vice Versa)
in terms of fight to get Ccfc back in Cov you might as well forget the sixfields 1500. They have not shown anything in the sixfields matches to date that they are prepared to protest in any shape or form !!!
Oh sorry i forgot they did say fill the stadium, what sort of protest that is supposed to be god only knows ?
Anyway we will get to see all these so called true supporters on tv for the sheff utd game, i can't wait Im looking forward to a good laugh at them !!
The real fans will be at port vale today pusb !!!!!!!!!!!
If any of you think that SISU don't care about the low attendances and protests then you really are deluded.
They don't have an endless supply of money. You have to remember what they are - an investment vehicle. They are accountable to their investors, who right now will be asking 'what the f***' is going on?
They can act as stubborn as they like, but they HATE this situation.
NOPM is working a treat - so stick it to them and don't be miserable, lazy, pride lacking little bitches.
PUSB - the fans are the club, not some hedge fund.
The self made multi millionaire of port vale seems to take a different view. Whose right I wonder?
A heavy reliance on the Port Vale chairman to reinforce the SISU position suddenly emerges?
Should we standby for a credibility argument from MK dons chairman to really cement the SISU position in the annals of sky blue history?
Nick........."In that post he said support the players and manager, nothing bad in it".................................................................................................................................................. I've said it before...this just proves it!...selective blindness mate!!!
What A total and utter lot of nonsense IMHO. I support the Manager & the Team and will be at Sixfields a week on Sunday PUSB!
Traitors is what I'd call the Sixfields few.
The truth, it pains me to say, is that SISU have won this particular battle and are here for the medium term. The way forward is difficult but will probably involve SISU recouping some or probably most of thier investment before loosening their grip on the club. This will probably mean them gaining some degree of control of ACL and the Arena. The argument now must be about how much control and how to protect the future of the club and the Arena.
I might be wrong but didn't the gillingham chairman also back?
Yes your are right.. he did... just before we played them as I recall also?
So thats 3 'Chairman' in the SISU camp(inclusive). Vote of confidence for Tim next.....(one hopes)
Edit *Oh and the Brentford Chairman as the role model.
He always makes a point of saying he will be at Sixfields as he knows it antagonises a great deal of posters on this forum.In that post he said support the players and manager, nothing bad in it.
A lot of people make a point of being on the hill? If people have an issue with him going into sixfields it is up to them?He always makes a point of saying he will be at Sixfields as he knows it antagonises a great deal of posters on this forum.
He/She is a performing Sea lion.
top shout.A heavy reliance on the Port Vale chairman to reinforce the SISU position suddenly emerges?
Should we standby for a credibility argument from MK dons chairman to really cement the SISU position in the annals of sky blue history?
Why the question marks after each sentence?A lot of people make a point of being on the hill? If people have an issue with him going into sixfields it is up to them?
Why the question marks after each sentence?
Yes, people do make a point of being on the hill, but in every single post?Because I was asking your thoughts on them, and I like question marks.
SISU do not have an endless supply of money. They are just stubborn.
If they aren't back before Feb / March we should form a Phoenix club and take control back.
SISU have been extremely lucky that this team is performing like they are - it has kept people from being even angrier.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?