I'm not agreeing or disagreeing here. But why are the "Barnsley 3" considered the way they are to some?
Because if it is just because they aren't performing as we want them to, then that isn't really fair.
Well, if we can have the Birmingham 6 and the Guilford 4, why not have the Barnsley 3?I'm not agreeing or disagreeing here. But why are the "Barnsley 3" considered the way they are to some?
Because if it is just because they aren't performing as we want them to, then that isn't really fair.
Off field rumours aside, their attitude on the pitch stinks. Thomas is a coward, all three look like they can’t be arsed.
A coward? That's a bit strong, Shmmeee.Off field rumours aside, their attitude on the pitch stinks. Thomas is a coward, all three look like they can’t be arsed.
Can't agree. Thomas often puts in a strong tackle (admittedly usually a recovering tackle!) and is the only defender ever likely to win an attacking header. Always one of the first in a scuffle.
Not sure what attitude your seeing with them either? Collins & Kitchen were bombed out - yes they arn't isn't Wilson & Big Mo but how are they supposed to appear?
It's all off field rumours, to me. Rumours from terribly biased ITKs. Seems very unfair. Yes, they may not be the players we want them to be at the minute but I think personally all this Barnsley 3 nonsense is unfounded, unfair and counter-productive.
A coward? That's a bit strong, Shmmeee.
I stand by what I said. Watch the game back and see how many time he just pussies out and taps the ball five yards to someone else because he doesn’t want it.
That's not being a coward. You saying "he doesn't want it" is in your head. It's more likely he's keeping the ball moving, keeping possession because he has no progressive options going forward. Much the same why Eccles and Sheaf go side to side now too. It's also more likely he is told to move the ball on to the likes of Binks, as it's clear Binks has the occasional long switch in his locker.
Coward is totally unfounded.
I do watch it. I dont see the same as you. I see a player whose distribution isn't great, so he moves it to players who are better at it - probably under instruction to do so.
It was an interesting watch, I thought he didn't do bad again the wrestler tbf.This thread is vintage SBT headloss after a bad performance.
DaSilva comes across as a lovely bloke, always has time for the staff and kids a like pregame. But because the opposition play a 6"2 winger and pump the ball over to him every game he's unlikable and clearly doesn't care about the club.
Off field rumours aside, their attitude on the pitch stinks. Thomas is a coward, all three look like they can’t be arsed.
Thomas is a coward, he types, whilst hiding behind a keyboard on the internet.
But then you also say he goes and puts in good blocks/tackles - if he was pussying out he wouldn't do that.I stand by what I said. Watch the game back and see how many time he just pussies out and taps the ball five yards to someone else because he doesn’t want it.
Thomas is a coward, he types, whilst hiding behind a keyboard on the internet.
They're not dislikeable as humans (far from it), just very frustrating as footballers.This idea that players are unlikeable because the team underperforms is weird to me.
That GIF is frightening. I feel like I'm tripping balls.
Sounds like the problem is yours, If we are struggling you want them to all 'fuck off' ?? The connection should be the shirt they put on. Don't know how long you've followed them but it's the life of a City fan. It's all about the journey (there is no 'destination' as such ( a bit deep for a Tuesday morning!) PUSB!Not really got time for any of them. Do we even sing any of their names? I'd say I'd shake the hand of Josh Eccles, if I had to. The rest can fuck off, I've no connection to any of them. What the heck has gone on?