lewys33
Well-Known Member
So implying that the lack of investment is because we need to cover the costs of sixfields isn't being an apologist? Unbelievable .......
People have been saying all sides are at fault for months even going back to the SISU out protests but if you don't blame just SISU you are an apologist. I like the fact that this is now being acknowledged.
Nobody is being slated anywhere?
It's an obvious consequence of that action.
So you don't seen the irony about campaigning to not give SISU any money and then moaning about them not spending any money on the team?
No I agree. The fans aren't turning up at sixfields, so it is definitely our fault that there is a lack of investment in the team. Silly me.
Who is campaigning to not give sisu any money??
That's a petulant way of putting it taken everything into account, my point being though we are not in a place where we can go and splash out on bringing in players for many reasons not just the one you chose to side with.
Not One Penny More?
I will wait for the council version of these if everybody has a share of the blame too?
All you ever do Nick is make snide and manipulative comments about Michael and KCIC. Implying is just as bad as saying in my opinion.
Have you sent all these people emails about the petition like we spoke about?
other reasons being?
Nope, still not had any replies from Michael to the messages I sent....
I think it is quite amusing how certain individuals have slated Michael for the comment about lack of investment in the team, ignoring the following points stating that all sides are at fault and need grilling!
I also find it quite amusing how it appears some would point the finger at the fans for there being a lack of money for players. Despite SISU saying they could cover the losses at sixfields.
My my what a joke ..........
FFP
Sponsorship revenues
Merchandise Sales
To name a few.
He asked me to speak to you. I sent you a message. Is this like one of those offers made by a third party so it is not officially heard?
Covering losses does not mean spending out.
No I made the offer directly.
So are you ignoring the fact I sent you a message asking if you could do it?
No I made the offer directly along with a couple of queries. I can't send emails out on behalf of the site without them being cleared up. I will send them to you later on to see if you can reply
all their own fault. Although the fans will be blamed for FFP. shame.
Sorry, I added this on, my fault :
I am not ignoring anything, I am the one being ignored.
Ah yes of course it is because everything is Sisu's fault isn't it? I forgot about that mindset.
Not everything at all. Moving to sixfields is their fault. Therefore the reactions to that move must also lie with them. Pre-sixfields is a different matter.
Can you still not see the irony though? Must just be me
I am not having any digs and I think Michael works his arse off for what he believes in but sometimes just proof read and proof read again before sending stuff out
Not everything at all. Moving to sixfields is their fault. Therefore the reactions to that move must also lie with them. Pre-sixfields is a different matter.
I do get the point. However it is irrelevant. It would be much more ironic if it was - NOPM DONT EVER GO TO SIXFIELDS OR YOU ARE AN AIDS INFESTED SCAB. WHY HAVE THEY NOT BOUGHT MICHAEL OWEN?! But it isn't.
Its just another thing where the fans are expected to bend and bend and bend. Why?
It is though, just not in so many wordsWell it is how it comes across.
I struggle to see how the move to Sixfields impacted on the sponsorship deals?? Plus then there is NOPM which was banded about the beginning of the season, of course you could (knowing you, you're more likely too argue it) argue that Sisu are at fault for these as well.
Yet it's still amazing as Michael was sounding off about their being no real investment in the team, yet he expects the owners to continue to pump their own money into a bottomless pit, just in fact like Pre-Sixfields.. Funny that.
I do get the point. However it is irrelevant. It would be much more ironic if it was - NOPM DONT EVER GO TO SIXFIELDS OR YOU ARE AN AIDS INFESTED SCAB. WHY HAVE THEY NOT BOUGHT MICHAEL OWEN?! But it isn't.
Its just another thing where the fans are expected to bend and bend and bend. Why?
Huh?!? Who's fault is it if not their own?
Why would they have pumped in their own money? The sale of Leon Clarke and the Arsenal game would be the clubs money wouldn't it? So could they not use the clubs money? Or does the clubs money have to fund the losses there now?
Huh?!? Who's fault is it if not their own?
Why would they have pumped in their own money? The sale of Leon Clarke and the Arsenal game would be the clubs money wouldn't it? So could they not use the clubs money? Or does the clubs money have to fund the losses there now?
To turn it around then they can't use the Clubs money to pay wages or to hold until a further time that a better option is avaliable?
But it is acceptable when people are shouting NOPM to the high heavens and you are labelled a scab if you bend?
Of course. But if they are relying on selling players to pay wages we are doomed. If it is the later I hope the better option hurries their arse up!
This is what people wanted isn't it? Starve the club and force it to sell its assets. Its obvious they will then use those assets to fund unanticipated holes in revenue.
Not One Penny More?
I will wait for the council version of these if everybody has a share of the blame too?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?