You are correct, but just to throw another one in the pot. As Holdings was and is the original company could it be that when they dropped out of the premier league the FL placed the GS in the wrong company as the PL share would of been with holdings as Ltd did not exist until 1995. Just a question???
ACL/CCC should be looking to legal action to reverse the liquidation & start the bidding process again !
I have written to the Football League on two occasions asking when the players registrations were transferred along with other issues. I have received fob off automated replies.
This morning Clarke in a public statement said it would be interesting but not altered the situation.
However at the point I requested this information I pointed out it could be proof SISU acted unlawfully in the administration process or the Football Leagues Administrative procedures were not fit for purpose!
They are now admitting mistakes.
I think the transfer was Fisher, Dulieu and co. (SISU) Who else did it? The fact is the league allowed it to happen! SISU don't get off the hook because it was allowed to happen.
so the football made mistakes, but coventry city had points deducted.
You are correct, but just to throw another one in the pot. As Holdings was and is the original company could it be that when they dropped out of the premier league the FL placed the GS in the wrong company as the PL share would of been with holdings as Ltd did not exist until 1995. Just a question???
If you have written to FL and not received a reply within 28 days you can make a formal complaint under there customer charter
You are correct, but just to throw another one in the pot. As Holdings was and is the original company could it be that when they dropped out of the premier league the FL placed the GS in the wrong company as the PL share would of been with holdings as Ltd did not exist until 1995. Just a question???
Yes FL are admitting mistakes, but they have not said player contracts had been transferred!
So maybe sisu/TF actually never did transfer or move assets from limited to Holdings. Maybe only new players were registered in Holdings? I think I remember there were a tiny sum listed in limited as player or staff contracts, and I assumed those would be the players on old - long - contracts like McSheff and Bell.
You are correct, but just to throw another one in the pot. As Holdings was and is the original company could it be that when they dropped out of the premier league the FL placed the GS in the wrong company as the PL share would of been with holdings as Ltd did not exist until 1995. Just a question???
It's not asset stripping it is potentially illegal in company law to put mechanisms in place to the detriment of potential bidders.
Does that really make any difference? The player registrations were all in LTD in 2011, so if SISU deliberately started putting contracts into Holdings after that point (which by FL admission no other club has done) isn't this a sign that they were taking a deliberate action to split the company to protect itself if it went into administration - isn't this still asset stripping?
the player contracts were taken out in CCFC H, TF confirmed this in March....... the registrations(at least some) were in CCFC Ltd - there was some registrations listed in the administrators initial report £466k. I suspect new contracts were completed in August 2011 when there was the hoohar following relegation about bonuses. The £466K i suspect related to contracts/registrations that ended in june 2013 so have no current value
Contracts and registrations have to be filed at FL ....... and they should be in the same company as the golden share because no other company is a member of the FL
acl/ccc should be looking to legal action to reverse the liquidation & start the bidding process again !
further update: Acl renews appeal to league to refer complaint to fa, & seeks to revert liquidation process which saw 10pt deduction
ACL statement :
An ACL spokesman said: “The Football League’s admission that it has made serious errors in the administration of Coventry City Football Club is a crucial development in this saga.
“That is what all the publicly available documentation makes clear – from the 2008 board minutes that recently came to light right through to the last set of filed accounts in 2012. It is also what the Football League’s own regulations say should be the case.
“It is therefore deeply disappointing that they have waited until now – with the administration process almost over – to make this admission.
"But fortunately there is still time to resolve this matter. The joint administrators have not yet liquidated the club so there is still time for a proper administration process to be run – one based on all the facts – that provides a fair outcome for creditors, for prospective purchasers of the club, and most of all for Sky Blues fans themselves.”
Firstly when the original company was split it was done with written approval from the FA and FL. In which case everyone knew where the share and it was in CCFC Ltd. When they got relegated it would have been CCFC Ltd that exchanged the share with I think Fulham as they went up. In 2008 when SISU took over there are Board minutes stating they knew where the share was in CCFC ltd. The FL have also confirmed that in March 2013 the share resided in CCFC Ltd until they took it back. Dont think there was any real confusion
Thanks, Hobo.
This has to be challenged. Hope the latest ACL statement is true, that there is still time to complete the administration based on all the facts.
FURTHER UPDATE: ACL renews appeal to League to refer complaint to FA, & seeks to revert liquidation process which saw 10pt deduction
Will this all surface during the liquidators investigations, or does it require a special investigation?
ACL/CCC should be looking to legal action to reverse the liquidation & start the bidding process again !
It should already be known by the administrator Godiva - but his angle is that it is all to do with beneficial ownership which quite frankly is tosh in my opinion
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?