Whilst our style of play is consistent, our goal scoring and hence results are not.
Our biggest problem has been converting the chances we have created (hence our expected goals stat).
Today we put our chances away and won well, but that clearly hasn't always been the case this season.
Let's agree to differ on this topic.
Lack of goals from midfield is our problem puts pressure on the defence, not easy to fix individually Hamer, Allen, Sheaf I rate all three not sure yet what Eccles offers but there’s a serious lack of goals from there and then there’s O’Hare not scoring enough. I would like to see another 15 goals from that area.I actually think giving away silly goals is our bigger problem. Too often we look like scoring then concede and the opposition can close up which we find hard to break down. I think if games stayed level more the opposition would be more open trying to score and play into our hands.
And no subs required.Absolutly brilliant performance!!
and the team were good aswell!!
I'd love to explore Dominican Republic or Haiti - but not just to travel all that way to treat it like the Costa del Sol. What's the point? Boring waste of time.You don't like holidaying on Caribbean islands?
To be fair there wasn't a clamour for subs today, apart from a bit saying use them to use up injury time.For all those moaning about subs.
What do you know
On Robins we trust.
Beg to differ. The defence is the problem. Far too many silly goals. Both against Blackburn should have been cut out, particularly Dack's.Hyam is too slow, McFadz is now too old and too slow. Rose is League 1 standard. At this level speed is everything.Lack of goals from midfield is our problem puts pressure on the defence, not easy to fix individually Hamer, Allen, Sheaf I rate all three not sure yet what Eccles offers but there’s a serious lack of goals from there and then there’s O’Hare not scoring enough. I would like to see another 15 goals from that area.
Probably thought it was the FA cup gameLoads of Liverpool fans in London
And quite a few Man City to be fair
To be honest statistics wise I would say so but I really dont think they look like it, but hey ho statistics can be manipulated as you likeView attachment 24356
Nice to see they aren't bitter, and one of the best championship sides ever? Really?
Never judge a sausage by its skinGyokeres improvement over 18 months is astonishing.
He underwhelmed at Swansea in the first part of last season, which in retrospect we can see was probably not his fault.
When he first arrived initially nobody was particularly impressed and he was on the subs bench quite a bit. Then we went on the late run and he began to get some plaudits. I remember Grendel saying something like 'there is something there and he might be worth a punt'.He got a goood goal against Stoke when he bullied their defence.
Now he is a monster and worth shitloads.
Moral of the story: First impressions can be deceptive
Grendel was spot on about Vik, a few of us agreed with him at the time. Also a few people said they’d rather we kept Max, baffling really hahaGyokeres improvement over 18 months is astonishing.
He underwhelmed at Swansea in the first part of last season, which in retrospect we can see was probably not his fault.
When he first arrived initially nobody was particularly impressed and he was on the subs bench quite a bit. Then we went on the late run and he began to get some plaudits. I remember Grendel saying something like 'there is something there and he might be worth a punt'.He got a goood goal against Stoke when he bullied their defence.
Now he is a monster and worth shitloads.
Moral of the story: First impressions can be deceptive
Grendel was spot on about Vik, a few of us agreed with him at the time. Also a few people said they’d rather we kept Max, baffling really haha
Grendel was spot on about Vik, a few of us agreed with him at the time. Also a few people said they’d rather we kept Max, baffling really haha
That was usWe were too.
Were you behind us in Block P3 Row D seats 64,65,66 by any chance?
Dack beat rose to the ball it was literally 0% down to HyamBeg to differ. The defence is the problem. Far too many silly goals. Both against Blackburn should have been cut out, particularly Dack's.Hyam is too slow, McFadz is now too old and too slow. Rose is League 1 standard. At this level speed is everything.
If we are spending any money, two good central defenders leaving the left side for Bidwell or another loan. Hyam stays in the squad as back up.
I'd love to explore Dominican Republic or Haiti - but not just to travel all that way to treat it like the Costa del Sol. What's the point? Boring waste of time.
If he scores another 4 gotta be worth about 20£1 million wasn’t he? Gotta be worth 7-8 now.
Sparks whats so funny, he would have scored 20 goals (21 if you include 1 against southampton) surely worth the fee
I'd want £10m for Gyo now
Probably notwill we hold out for that?
If more than one club are interested in him, then simple economics of demand outstripping supply [i.e. 1 Gyo] = inflated price. I'm not sure a fee could reach £10m, but stranger things have happened in football, as most clubs are financial basket cases.will we hold out for that?
Tbf Pete it was the left back position where the goal was conceived,Maatson and Bidwell both had contact on the ball without getting it clear and Callum even ventured in there .Dack beat rose to the ball it was literally 0% down to Hyam
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?